News: 1763382170

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Palantir plots NHS skills drive for its controversial data platform

(2025/11/17)


Palantir is working with "AI upskilling platform" Multiverse to provide an apprenticeship program specific to its Federated Data Platform (FDP), the NHS analytics system being run under a controversial contract.

In a statement, the companies said their agreement would help NHS staff use the FDP to support operations, improve care, drive up efficiency, and drive down waiting lists. They said the apprenticeship program would launch in February 2026 with a curriculum tailored to NHS roles including analysts, administrators, managers, and clinical staff.

Louis Mosley, Palantir executive vice president for UK and Europe, stated: "The NHS FDP is already improving care for patients while cutting paperwork for doctors and nurses. Now we need to double down to keep driving up the number of NHS staff who are trained on the technology – and this partnership will be central to that."

[1]

However, critics have pointed to the circumstances under which Palantir – founded with cash from the CIA-backed investment fund In-Q-Tel – was awarded [2]the £330 million contract to run the FDP .

[3]

[4]

Former British prime minister [5]Boris Johnson and his chief adviser Dominic Cummings met with Peter Thiel , co-founder and chairman of Palantir, in 2019, months before the company landed a key role in the UK's COVID-19 response, according to a Guardian report earlier this year.

The meeting, which was kept from the official record, took place on August 28, 2019, months before the UK government began forming its response to the pandemic, which would [6]see Palantir awarded £60 million in contracts without competition , starting with a contract awarded for just £1.

[7]Johnson, Cummings met Thiel months before Palantir won NHS pandemic role

[8]Write-back to aging UK health systems lessens benefits of Palantir-based platform

[9]Greater Manchester says its NHS analytics stack is years ahead of Palantir wares

[10]Some English hospitals doubt Palantir's utility: We'd 'lose functionality rather than gain it'

Earlier this year, [11]campaign group Corporate Watch reported that some local NHS trusts and bodies are refusing to comply with the rollout of the FDP, describing Palantir's technology as a step backward on existing systems. It found that only 34 trusts (just under 15 percent) were actively using the platform and its products.

In May, [12]Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (ICB) decided not to adopt the national data platform until it has more evidence of the benefits and risks.

[13]

Last year, Shona Dunn, the Department of Health and Social Care accounting officer for the FDP, said that the full business case estimated that the FDP will realise benefit [14]in the order of £780 million over the seven-year appraisal period . This includes cash-releasing benefits up to £60 million per year within five years and non-cash-releasing benefits in the order of £55 million per year within five years. ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aRtUp13L8mit-q54wJiEyAAAARU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/22/palantir_wins_nhs_contract/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aRtUp13L8mit-q54wJiEyAAAARU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aRtUp13L8mit-q54wJiEyAAAARU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/10/johnson_cummings_thiel_meeting/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/20/palantir_nhs_england_deal/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/10/johnson_cummings_thiel_meeting/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/10/writeback_to_ageing_nhs_systems/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/21/greater_manchester_nhs_palantir/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/16/nhs_hospitals_palantir/

[11] https://corporatewatch.org/foi-requests-reveal-palantirs-nhs-fdp-rollout-failures/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/23/greater_manchester_palantir_snub/

[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aRtUp13L8mit-q54wJiEyAAAARU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[14] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-of-health-and-social-care-accounting-officer-assessments/federated-data-platform-programme-accounting-officer-assessment

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Meanwhile...

Helcat

It's been announced that there'll be cutbacks in NHS staff. Specifically in the admin and managerial roles.

So is there a link between this AI upskilling and staff cutbacks? Or is this left hand / right hand methodology?

Guess the public will find out when the failures of the system only get worse...

Re: Meanwhile...

wolfetone

I think if you speak to any one in the NHS, the main gripe/bug bear is that there seems to be far too many managers and pen pushers who are all on wages that are bigger than what their skillset/job should allow.

The fact AI is here being spoken about I think is more the fact that it now makes these cutbacks more achievable. As before I don't think any government had the stomach for it.

Re: Meanwhile...

Anonymous Coward

Sorry but thats complete bollocks.

“Too many managers” is the go to lazy solution for anyone needing a safe answer to the wicked problem of solving the NHS conundrum.

It’s exactly the same paradigm as blurting out “AI”, “Big Data”, “Underpants Gnomes” or any meaningless high level buzz-word solution in a business setting, without wanting to do the difficult boring business analysis work.

There are a million reasons why we wouldn’t want to make a US private military firms product a key part of our national infrastructure and it’s completely right to question doing this when there are almost no technical or specialist managerial staff left.

There is now a significant proportion of government, industry (and doctors) who believe the world is a far better place if the NHS moved to private and this is what is currently happening (from BMA strikes to Wes Streetings sponsors)… and it’s nothing to do with “too many managers” or “we just need strong matrons on wards again” /rant

Re: Meanwhile...

Anonymous Coward

Sorry, whilst it's not the whole problem 'too many managers' is not complete bollocks.

When I joined the NHS in '98 there were two levels of management between me, a lowly desktop support tech and the Director of IT and you could genuinely walk into the Directors office and get a decision/problem resolved if you weren't getting anywhere through the 'correct' channels. When I left four years ago there were nine levels of management between me and the Director and it was impossible to get a decision on anything, Impossible to get other teams held accountable for the problems they caused. Fundamentally nothing had changed in those twenty two years other than the teams had got bigger, there was no reason to add layers of manglement.

Re: Meanwhile...

Anonymous Coward

Are you happy the sample size for your conclusion there is reasonable?

Re: Meanwhile...

hoola

Those pushing this agenda all stand to benefit from privatisation:

Lucrative contracts

Higher salaries (consultants etc)

Patient data to sell (although Palantir are winning that one)

There is nothing to suggest that the average person will actually be better of, either medically or financially.

"for its controversial data platform"

Pascal Monett

It's platform is not controversial at all.

All the governments are eager to adopt it . . .

I know on which side my bread is buttered.
-- John Heywood