25 years of meatbags permanently in space on the ISS
(2025/11/07)
- Reference: 1762522370
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/11/07/25_years_of_crews_aboard/
- Source link:
Anyone turning 25 this week has never known a time when humans weren't living in space. The same might not be true when they're 30.
On November 2, 2000, the first crew docked with the International Space Station. Commander Bill Shepherd and cosmonauts Yuri Gidzenko and Sergei Krikalev arrived aboard Soyuz TM-31, entering a station barely ready for habitation.
Elon Musk calls for International Space Station to be deorbited by 2027 [1]READ MORE
Shepherd was a veteran of three Space Shuttle flights, and Gidzenko and Krikalev both had stints on the Mir space station. The early days of the ISS would test all three.
The ISS in 2000 bore little resemblance to today's sprawling outpost. Its iconic solar arrays had yet to arrive, and the majority of its modules were still works in progress on Earth. It contained just three pressurized modules – Zvezda, Zarya (also referred to as the Functional Cargo Block), and the US-built Unity module.
Jim Orberg, author of Star-Crossed orbits quoted a veteran space-worker who captured the situation bluntly: "We launched the space shuttle when we were 90 percent ready. But we're launching the space station at only 50 percent."
[2]
The crew faced that reality immediately. Glitchy software required workarounds and patching. Hardware malfunctioned. Without proper solar arrays, power from the Russian modules couldn't supply the American hardware, so Unity (also known as Node 1) remained sealed off. The three astronauts squeezed into cramped Russian quarters designed for two.
[3]
[4]
Commander Shepherd kept a mission log documenting the chaos. Systems regularly malfunctioned, and the crew struggled to get the printer working Even the tool for reporting problems — the "crew squawk" — refused to start.
In a postflight report, Oberg mentions the commander describing the station as "unsafe" due to the amount of stowage; indeed, storage has continued to present a challenge for crews, to the point that one of the Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules (used to transport cargo on the Space Shuttle) was modified to become a permanent fixture on the ISS.
[5]
Yet various crews persevered and through the 2000s, the station grew dramatically. Space Shuttles hauled up the massive truss structure, solar arrays, laboratories, and additional modules. The station reached its current configuration by 2011, when the shuttle program ended. Crew size expanded from three to six, now seven — three in a Russian Soyuz, four in a SpaceX Crew Dragon.
[6]ESA tests bacterial powder to feed Moon and Mars crews
[7]Engineers successfully reboost International Space Station after early Dragon abort
[8]Reckon you can put a nuclear reactor on the Moon?
[9]Trump's budget bill bankrolls $85M Space Shuttle shuffle
Each crew increment was scheduled to last 12 months, although several longer-duration missions occured, both planned and [10]unplanned . The occasional near-disaster took place too, such as Italian astronaut Luca Parmitano's helmet [11]filling with water during a spacewalk .
Over the last quarter of the century, the ISS has hosted a permanent human presence. Not, however, for much longer.
The ISS is dying. Zvezda, built in the 1980s for the never completed Mir 2, now [12]leaks air from aging seams and its systems are past their best. NASA and its partners plan to deorbit the station by decade's end. In 2024, NASA signed a deal with SpaceX and it is likely a modified Dragon spacecraft will fire its engines to send the ISS to a controlled destruction in the Pacific Ocean.
And then what? NASA originally planned commercial stations to replace the ISS, but timelines have slipped repeatedly. The agency recently downgraded requirements from permanent crews to [13]month-long visits — four astronauts at a time instead of seven living full-time in orbit.
[14]
Perhaps we don't need humans up there. Crew members spend much of their time maintaining the station itself. Companies like Varda have demonstrated that [15]manufacturing works fine in space without meatbags .
But habits are hard to break, especially 25 year-old ones. Humanity has grown accustomed to always having someone overhead, circling the planet every 90 minutes. When the ISS falls, that presence ends — at least for now.
So please, raise a glass to 25 years of a continuous human presence in space. It might be a while before another outpost achieves the same milestone. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/21/elon_musk_iss_mogensen_insult/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/03/esa_launches_study_phase_of/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/29/international_space_station_successfully_reboosted/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/15/nuclear_moon/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/02/space_shuttle_relocation_bill/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/28/frank_rubio_iss_lands/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2013/07/17/spacewalk_aborted_after_helmet_fills_with_water/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/01/iss_is_still_leaking/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/07/nasa_changes_the_rules_of/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/19/varda_gets_faa_reentry_license/
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
On November 2, 2000, the first crew docked with the International Space Station. Commander Bill Shepherd and cosmonauts Yuri Gidzenko and Sergei Krikalev arrived aboard Soyuz TM-31, entering a station barely ready for habitation.
Elon Musk calls for International Space Station to be deorbited by 2027 [1]READ MORE
Shepherd was a veteran of three Space Shuttle flights, and Gidzenko and Krikalev both had stints on the Mir space station. The early days of the ISS would test all three.
The ISS in 2000 bore little resemblance to today's sprawling outpost. Its iconic solar arrays had yet to arrive, and the majority of its modules were still works in progress on Earth. It contained just three pressurized modules – Zvezda, Zarya (also referred to as the Functional Cargo Block), and the US-built Unity module.
Jim Orberg, author of Star-Crossed orbits quoted a veteran space-worker who captured the situation bluntly: "We launched the space shuttle when we were 90 percent ready. But we're launching the space station at only 50 percent."
[2]
The crew faced that reality immediately. Glitchy software required workarounds and patching. Hardware malfunctioned. Without proper solar arrays, power from the Russian modules couldn't supply the American hardware, so Unity (also known as Node 1) remained sealed off. The three astronauts squeezed into cramped Russian quarters designed for two.
[3]
[4]
Commander Shepherd kept a mission log documenting the chaos. Systems regularly malfunctioned, and the crew struggled to get the printer working Even the tool for reporting problems — the "crew squawk" — refused to start.
In a postflight report, Oberg mentions the commander describing the station as "unsafe" due to the amount of stowage; indeed, storage has continued to present a challenge for crews, to the point that one of the Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules (used to transport cargo on the Space Shuttle) was modified to become a permanent fixture on the ISS.
[5]
Yet various crews persevered and through the 2000s, the station grew dramatically. Space Shuttles hauled up the massive truss structure, solar arrays, laboratories, and additional modules. The station reached its current configuration by 2011, when the shuttle program ended. Crew size expanded from three to six, now seven — three in a Russian Soyuz, four in a SpaceX Crew Dragon.
[6]ESA tests bacterial powder to feed Moon and Mars crews
[7]Engineers successfully reboost International Space Station after early Dragon abort
[8]Reckon you can put a nuclear reactor on the Moon?
[9]Trump's budget bill bankrolls $85M Space Shuttle shuffle
Each crew increment was scheduled to last 12 months, although several longer-duration missions occured, both planned and [10]unplanned . The occasional near-disaster took place too, such as Italian astronaut Luca Parmitano's helmet [11]filling with water during a spacewalk .
Over the last quarter of the century, the ISS has hosted a permanent human presence. Not, however, for much longer.
The ISS is dying. Zvezda, built in the 1980s for the never completed Mir 2, now [12]leaks air from aging seams and its systems are past their best. NASA and its partners plan to deorbit the station by decade's end. In 2024, NASA signed a deal with SpaceX and it is likely a modified Dragon spacecraft will fire its engines to send the ISS to a controlled destruction in the Pacific Ocean.
And then what? NASA originally planned commercial stations to replace the ISS, but timelines have slipped repeatedly. The agency recently downgraded requirements from permanent crews to [13]month-long visits — four astronauts at a time instead of seven living full-time in orbit.
[14]
Perhaps we don't need humans up there. Crew members spend much of their time maintaining the station itself. Companies like Varda have demonstrated that [15]manufacturing works fine in space without meatbags .
But habits are hard to break, especially 25 year-old ones. Humanity has grown accustomed to always having someone overhead, circling the planet every 90 minutes. When the ISS falls, that presence ends — at least for now.
So please, raise a glass to 25 years of a continuous human presence in space. It might be a while before another outpost achieves the same milestone. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/21/elon_musk_iss_mogensen_insult/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/03/esa_launches_study_phase_of/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/29/international_space_station_successfully_reboosted/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/15/nuclear_moon/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/02/space_shuttle_relocation_bill/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/28/frank_rubio_iss_lands/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2013/07/17/spacewalk_aborted_after_helmet_fills_with_water/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/01/iss_is_still_leaking/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/07/nasa_changes_the_rules_of/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQ4lpv-r-wH-ONwjRnUqCAAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/19/varda_gets_faa_reentry_license/
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The Mir age
Lon24
If you missed it last night catch up on BBC iPlayer 'Once Upon Time in Space' episode 2.
It features an ageing and broken Mir with its first mixed US/USSR crews. Impending disaster by fire or depressurisation both happened. Guts were on display (luckily not the other kind). But it paved the way for the ISS building on the experience of managing long periods in space. Made even more remote by the intermittent and garbled communication links. An eye-opener for those used to the 'comforts ' of the NASA Space Shuttle.
Also an interesting contrast between the two US astronauts in integrating with the Russian cosmonauts. Though, imho, cosmonaut Sasha and his family stole the show.
No love for....
Sparkus
Tiangong?
Re: No love for....
Kurgan
China is going to go on and maintain a presence in space, while "the west" implodes and becomes irrelevant to science.
If its not Trump backhander than it won't continue
Boris56789
With Musk and his 1 % now so Rich they are doing space. Just think if half that money went to paying their way and they were just millionaires.
Problem is they are not advancing space for mankind. They are burning up resources, hoarding wealth and pushing AI that they know that the earth will be screwed faster than anyone could have guessed.
They will try and teraform and than dollar and dime they new inhabitance or workers for everything including oxygen.
Others will be mining space and have mining ships where you work to live and they still live in an opulant life free of laws.
Trump will be happy and take the cash and keep his King complex and use the wars for not being able to replace the IIS
One step forward, two steps back!
When I was a mere baby, man walked on the Moon. We have not been back in over 50 years.
Now after 25 years of someone living in orbit, we are to lose that as well. How long before someone returns?
What's next? We stop flying high altitude aircraft.