News: 1762421413

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

UK space sector 'lacks strategic direction,' Lords warn

(2025/11/06)


The UK's House of Lords UK Engagement with Space Committee has published a scathing report, "The Space Economy: Act Now or Lose Out," declaring that the 2021 National Space Strategy has "failed to turn its ambitions into reality."

The verdict is blunt: "The UK space sector lacks the strategic direction necessary for success."

Brit scientists over the Moon after growing tea in lunar soil [1]READ MORE

The space sector contributes £18.6 billion to the UK economy, employs approximately 55,000 people and has enviable technological prowess when it comes to building satellites and payloads. The industry is more than twice as productive as the UK average and currently accounts for between 4.3 percent and 6.1 percent of the global space economy. But the latest figures reveal an 8.9 percent contraction between 2021/22 and 2022/23."

Part of the problem stems from Brexit as the UK no longer has a formal say in the EU space program. The report highlights the country's exclusion from ESA's Copernicus project until 2024 and access to European markets becoming more "complex and burdensome".

It adds: "the UK's ability to influence the direction of ESA and maximise the benefits of its programmes may be fundamentally altered should ESA become more heavily influenced by EU policymaking."

[2]

Another problem? Responsibility for space is scattered across government. Defense falls under the Ministry of Defence, trade under the Department for Business and Trade, launch regulation under Transport — while the UK Space Agency faces absorption into the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. The report recommends creating a dedicated Space Minister to coordinate efforts.

[3]

[4]

The commitee also calls for a shift in funding from research grants (aimed at nurturing research and development), to procurement-based funding that can "crowd in private investment and strengthen national capabilities."

Like many other countries, the UK depends heavily on SpaceX. Falcon 9 dominates launch services and Starlink leads in satellite broadband. This worries the committee, particularly given "increased demand for SpaceX launch services and the potential politicisation of the Starlink service."

[5]

Although there's no immediate threat to access, the report urges the government to "ensure access to diversified and/or sovereign services where possible" and research the potential impacts of losing SpaceX access.

[6]ESA tests bacterial powder to feed Moon and Mars crews

[7]SpaceX shows off progress on its lunar Starship

[8]Starlink tells the world it has over 150 sextillion IPv6 addresses

[9]NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Another 550 employees set to leave the building

[10]Weird ideas welcome: VC fund looking to make science fiction factual

Broader concerns exist about US reliability. The UK military's space relationship with the US remains strong, but civilian ties with NASA face "great uncertainty given recent shifts in US policy."

Dr Bleddyn Bowen, Associate Professor of Astropolitics at the School of Government and International Affairs (SGIA) at Durham University, told the committee that "given the events and the discourse of the past five or six months, my faith in the United States has been shaken."

The UK is the only country to have developed an orbital-class rocket and then cancelled it. The report notes: "the business case for a UK-based launcher and UK-based spaceports has not been fully proven, and that economic viability should be considered."

The security argument is compelling, it adds. "A sovereign launch capacity would strengthen national security, underpin the growth of the UK’s space and satellite industries, and ensure that Britain remains a trusted and resilient partner within the allied space operations."

[11]

UK-based launch vehicle maker Skyrora, which has yet to make its first orbital launch, [12]said the report "makes clear that sovereign launch is not a luxury, it is a strategic necessity" and that "the UK must reassert its sovereign capability to access orbit."

Dr Bowen [13]observed , "The 'Act Now or Lose Out' title is quite apt as most other major and developing economies are making significant investments in space, both civil and especially military. All on top of a more febrile geopolitical environment where old dependencies and relationships have to be re-examined."

The report's warning is stark: "Only the most forward-looking and strategic states will be able to reap the benefits of the expanding and changing space economy — those who do not adapt will be left behind.

"The UK must act now if it wishes to be a leader in the growing space economy, the new race for space." ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/22/moon_tea/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aQx_x9BdhFCnASkDJNIySgAAAUw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQx_x9BdhFCnASkDJNIySgAAAUw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQx_x9BdhFCnASkDJNIySgAAAUw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQx_x9BdhFCnASkDJNIySgAAAUw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/03/esa_launches_study_phase_of/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/31/spacex_shows_off_lunar_starship/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/29/nded/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/14/more_jpl_employees_set_to/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/11/deep_future_fund/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQx_x9BdhFCnASkDJNIySgAAAUw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://skyrora.com/realising-uk-sovereign-assured-responsive-launch-through-skyrora-and-mod-led-space-capability-procurement/

[13] https://bsky.app/profile/bleddb.bsky.social/post/3m4sax5jvoc2f

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Paul Herber

"Only the most forward-looking and strategic states will be able to reap the benefits of the expanding and changing space economy — those who do not adapt will be left behind."

If the need for a sovereign spaceport is paramount then Andorra, San Marino, Luxembourg and Liechtenstein stand no chance.

Space sector?

DrewPH

The fact that the UK even has a space sector never really registered on my radar - but perhaps that proves the committee's point...

Re: Space sector?

Paul Herber

"... never really registered on my radar"

Stealthy Secret Space Sector.

Re: Space sector?

Like a badger

They're already working on flawed data, which disappointingly the article repeats. Almost half of the claimed value of the UK space sector is Sky, and not only are Sky merely a media and telecoms reseller owned by a US corporation, they're getting out of satellite broadcast as fast as they can, with the plan being to be terrestrial only by (IIRC) 2027.

We do have a handful of excellent niche space operations, mostly satellite makers, but these seem to exist in spite of government, with little or no recognition or support. The UK government's misbegotten half a billion "investment" in OneWeb is a prize example - in principle it could be good, our government supporting new space tech companies, except that by the time they did this OneWeb was bankrupt and almost a decade behind Starlink or Kuiper, and could never catch up.

If government really wanted to help OneWeb or any struggling business, the time to intervene is well BEFORE the company goes bust.

Window lickers

elsergiovolador

The Space Committee is like window lickers. They'd love to taste what other countries do.

But you can't have it if you kick the living sh*t out of entrepreneurs and treat engineers like livestock - UK subsequent governments favourite pastime.

Doctor Syntax

"The UK is the only country to have developed an orbital-class rocket and then cancelled it."

Developing technology and cancelling it is our national speciality. I put it down to having a political class that doesn't realise that the expense comes upfront which means that the first built appears very, very expensive and they take fright.

ParlezVousFranglais

Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Brexit. Its continuing mission: to explore strange new funding models, to seek out new strategies and competent government ministers, to boldly go where no split infinitive has gone before.

Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.