News: 1761652293

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Beatings, killings, and lasting fear: The human toll of MoD's Afghan data breach

(2025/10/28)


Research submitted to the UK Parliament has revealed explicit threats to life and the deaths of family members and colleagues directly linked to the Ministry of Defence's 2022 Afghan relocation scheme data breach.

Led by charity Refugee Legal Support and assisted by academics from Lancaster and York universities, of the 231 individuals affected by what may be one of the UK's most damaging data protection failures, 49 of them said family or colleagues had been killed in Afghanistan.

The [1]survey also discovered that an even greater proportion (87 percent) reported other forms of personal risks stemming from the Taliban's reaction to the leak.

[2]

Nearly 100 direct threats to respondents' own lives were reported, while 121 said their family and friends had been threatened in Afghanistan.

[3]

[4]

According to 105 of those affected, the Taliban had raided their homes, and an equal number said their families' homes were also raided.

Only 12 people said they had not experienced any of these risks, while 15 declined to respond.

Afghan breach in brief

The first Afghan resettlement breach [5]occurred in 2021 , exposing the details of 245 Afghan interpreters helping British forces in a CC'd (not BCC'd) email.

The Information Commissioner's Office [6]fined the MoD £350,000 in 2023 over it.

A second, [7]more serious breach occurred in February 2022 involving the details of around 19,000 resettlement scheme applicants, plus a few senior British officials and spies.

The MoD did not identify the leak until part of the list was published online in August 2023, presenting an immediate threat to everyone affected, especially those who were still in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.

The Taliban were actively hunting down people who had assisted British/Western troops during the conflict.

The UK government secured a super-injunction preventing reporting of the breach.

Included in the research submitted to the Defence Committee were personal accounts from those affected, detailing the horrors that followed the email blunder.

One member of the Triple Special Forces, who is currently residing in the UK, said: "I have suffered serious harm as a result of the Afghan data breach. My personal car was taken, and our home has been searched multiple times.

[8]

"My father was brutally beaten to the point that his toenails were forcibly removed, and my parents remain under constant and serious threat. My family and I continue to face intimidation, repeated house searches, and ongoing danger to our safety."

Others said they were under constant pressure from the Taliban, questioned and threatened every day, and beatings were common.

Impact on mental health

Stress, anxiety, depression, loss of concentration and memory, and sleeplessness were the most commonly reported symptoms of mental ill-health among those affected by the data breach, according to the research.

Nearly nine in ten respondents (89 percent) reported impacts on their own as well as their families' well-being. Only 3 percent of affected individuals said they were mentally unaffected, while the remaining 8 percent said they either did not know or declined to answer.

One Afghan National Army member currently living in Afghanistan said: "The data breach has seriously impacted both my physical and mental health.

[9]

"Since learning that my personal information was compromised, I have been living in constant fear and stress. I suffer from anxiety, sleepless nights, and extreme worry for the safety of myself and my family. The threat to my life and the risk of Taliban targeting have affected my well-being and daily functioning."

For others, some of whom were resettled to the UK while their families remain in Afghanistan, the uncertainty around the safety of their loved ones is the greatest source of concern.

One Triple Special Forces member reported living in "constant fear and guilt," despite feeling personally safe now in the UK.

"The breach has become a daily source of anxiety and emotional torment. My family – who remain in Afghanistan – are terrified. They ask me every day: Are we in danger? Did you share our names, phone numbers, addresses, or photos in your emails to the UK? Could the Taliban find us because of this?

[10]UK data regulator defends decision not to investigate MoD Afghan data breach

[11]UK government dragged for incomplete security reforms after Afghan leak fallout

[12]UK's Ministry of Defence pins hopes on AI to stop the next massive email blunder

[13]Britain's Ministry of Defence fined £350K over Afghan interpreter BCC email blunder

"I try to reassure them, but I don't have answers. The uncertainty is unbearable. My younger brother constantly asks, what if they come and take us as hostages? The fear is not just from the breach itself, but from the overwhelming amount of misinformation and panic spreading on social media. Even if the breach didn't expose everything, the fake news alone is destroying their mental health."

Those who were resettled were extremely grateful, but also said the process took far too long for a situation marred by urgent danger (up to 24 months after receiving an offer letter), and their families remain under threat due to lengthy additional processes involved in relocating them too.

One said their youngest daughters and disabled brothers remain in Afghanistan despite being financially dependent on them. The process of reuniting the family has taken more than a year, with no progress on the application.

Others also reported poor treatment by agency staff who facilitated their migration and experiences of racism from Brits.

"This research lays bare the devastating human consequences of the MoD data breach," said Olivia Clarke, executive director at Refugee Legal Support. "By centering Afghan voices and documenting their experiences, it fills a critical gap in understanding the real-world impact of the breach.

"Afghans who served alongside UK forces have reported renewed threats, violent assaults, and even the killing of family members after their personal details were exposed.

"Only a minority of those affected by the data breach have been offered relocation to the UK. The UK government must invite all affected Afghans to put forward evidence of the risks following the breach of their and their families' data, and review the negative decisions of their cases."

Victoria Canning, professor of criminology at Lancaster University, said: "By centralizing the experiences of Afghans, our research shows the real human cost of the MoD data breach. As well as threats to life, killings, and house raids, the mental health toll on affected Afghans and their families is devastating.

"Many people remain in serious danger. The UK government needs to respond urgently to ensure safety, including expediting relocations and ensuring redress."

The research findings were submitted to the Defence Committee on Friday, and the full report is due to be published in November. ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/149931/html/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aQD2qhC6JDRJmtF5MO83nQAAAA8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQD2qhC6JDRJmtF5MO83nQAAAA8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQD2qhC6JDRJmtF5MO83nQAAAA8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/21/mod_email_fail_afghan_interpreters_data/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/13/mod_bcc_email_fine/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/29/uk_government_breach_review/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aQD2qhC6JDRJmtF5MO83nQAAAA8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aQD2qhC6JDRJmtF5MO83nQAAAA8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/10/22/ico_afghan_leak_probe/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/29/uk_government_breach_review/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/06/mod_taps_aussie_ai_shop/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/13/mod_bcc_email_fine/

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Well...

DarkwavePunk

I'm totally confident in the rollout of Digital ID and OSA. What could possibly go wrong given the proven track record of governmental systems security?

On the actual subject, it's horrendous how these people have been betrayed no matter your stance on that conflict.

idiots on computers

user555

Oh, man, so this was an idiot giving out editable documents instead of printing the relevant data to a PDF. So predictable. :(

Re: idiots on computers

Like a badger

What's equally troubling is that the arseholes of MoD (a) should already know all there is to know about keeping stuff secret, and (b) had already been fined for the previous DP breach.

And despite those aggravating circumstances, has anybody senior been held to account? Of course not.

How ..

Anonymous Coward

Perhaps worth bearing in mind how this debacle unfolded.

Feb 2022 a British soldier (marine I think) in the UK who was working with several Afgans in Afganistan to establish who was eligible for asylum in the UK mailed them a spreadsheet that contained more information than he/she realised. One of those Afgans then decided to try to blackmail the UK by threatening to give the spreadsheet to the Afgan Govt - the Taliban. I don't think it's public knowledge whether the UK gave into the blackmail or not, but what did happen was the Afgan blackmailer did in fact gave the Tailban the spreadsheet.

What then happened was at cabinet level it was decided to import all 24,000 Afgan soldiers named on the spreadsheet. Cabinet also decided it's to be done in complete secrecy and a superinjunction got slapped on the whole thing. Then Lab takes office and they decide to continue with the superinjunction. Word only finally gets out about what is happening when in Jul 2025 after years of legal wrangling by several newspapers, the superinjuction is killed by the courts.

It then turns out total numbers of Afgans brought in under the secret scheme is now well above 120,000 and still climbing. And to house many of them, British soldiers have been evicted from MOD housing.

Now what would have been better all round would have been for the UK to pay an annual danegeld to the Afgan Govt to ensure the safety of everyone on the spreadsheet. Would have been far cheaper the us and far better for the Afgans.

The report the El Reg article is based on is by a refugee legal support charity. Biased or what. It'll be more worthwhile when we get an official & independent report - though quite likely that will need a change of government for that to happen so deeply are the last Con and current Lab govts immersed in the mess.

And a few weeks ago it was reported that the Afgan Govt is doing a healthy trade in selling for a small fee an "official govt death threat" which purchasers then use to claim sanctuary in the UK.

And of course, the usual specialist compensation legal firms are now preparing cases against the UK govt because their clients have been traumatised.

And the Afgan blackmailer? Well, we gave him asylum just the same.

And so far as I know, no UK official/politician/soldier or anyone, especially not Ben Wallace the MOD SoS at the time, has been punished over this.

Utterly utterly useless, the lot of 'em - previous Govt & present Govt.

Remember 1688.

Re: How ..

Blazde

120,000? That's just not credible because it's not nearly enough for a proper great replacement. I heard the true figure was over 70 million...

(The figure is about 36,000 for both secret and non-secret schemes)

Useless useless politicians and civil servants........

Anonymous Coward

Quote: ".....Utterly utterly useless....."

Yup....it goes back A LONG WAY.........................

1840: Brits thrown out of Afghanistan

1880: Brits (again) thrown out of Afghanistan

1987: Russians thrown out of Afghanistan

.....until August 20, 2021: Brits and Americans thrown out of Afghanistan.

.....and the beat goes on............

So.....the "utterly utterly useless" politicians have been "utterly utterly useless" for quite a while!

Quote (George Santayana): "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

"Marriage is like a cage; one sees the birds outside desperate to get in, and
those inside desperate to get out."
-- Montaigne