Climate goals go up in smoke as US datacenters turn to coal
- Reference: 1760103852
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/10/10/datacenter_coal_power/
- Source link:
According to a research note from financial services firm Jefferies, datacenter operators are racing to connect new capacity to the electrical grid, with accelerated load growth expected during the 2026-2028 period.
This spike in demand is driving an unexpected resurgence in coal generation, which has increased nearly 20 percent year-to-date. The research note, seen by The Register , states:
[1]
"We raise our estimate for coal generation by ~11 percent (driven by higher capacity factors), and staying elevated through 2027 on favorable fuel pricing vs gas (particularly for existing fleet).".
[2]
[3]
Warnings emerged last year that rising energy demand from the proliferation of data centers in the US risked outstripping available generation capacity, potentially extending the operational life of coal-fired power plants.
In Omaha, one power company [4]reversed plans to stop burning coal to produce electricity, citing the need to serve nearby datacenters. The company determined that decommissioning coal-burning generators at the North Omaha power plant would risk power shortages in the district given rising energy requirements from these facilities.
[5]
This reversal, as The Register reported at the time, carries environmental implications. Continued coal combustion affects local air quality near power plants and hinders broader efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Campaign group Greenpeace has [6]characterized coal as "the dirtiest, most polluting way of producing energy."
The environmental impact extends globally. A 2024 Morgan Stanley report projected that datacenters will emit 2.5 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases worldwide by 2030 — [7]triple the emissions that would have occurred without the development of generative AI technology.
Natural gas-powered turbine generators had been the favored choice to power the ongoing datacenter build boom, especially as these can be sited directly on campus to provide local generation. However, current gas prices have made this option less economically attractive.
[8]
As the Financial Times notes in an [9]article on whether datacenters are a setback for the green energy transition, developers tend to favor power sources that are easily available for their initial build-out.
If operators can get their facility online as soon as possible while securing renewable energy commitments, they will, but the stopgap will be whatever is to hand, and this is likely natural gas or coal.
[10]Fire up the gas turbines, says US Interior Secretary: We gotta win the AI arms race
[11]Datacenters face rising thirst as Europe dries up
[12]NIMBYs threaten to sink Project Sail, a $17B datacenter development in Georgia
[13]Datacenter lobby blows a fuse over EU efficiency proposals
The current federal policy environment presents additional challenges for renewable energy adoption. The Trump administration has implemented measures that affect renewable energy development, including [14]freezing approval processes for wind energy projects and announcing [15]restrictions on new solar and wind power projects , with officials citing land use and cost concerns.
This policy direction contrasts with research indicating that renewable energy could [16]power datacenters at lower cost than fossil fuels or emerging technologies such as small modular reactors (SMRs), which are [17]gaining attention , despite being largely untested.
Yet this isn't a consideration for Washington at the moment. Last month, US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum [18]told a natural gas industry event : "The real existential threat right now is not a degree of climate change. It's the fact that we could lose the AI arms race if we don't have enough power."
Similarly, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright [19]told an energy conference in March: "The Trump administration will treat climate change for what it is, a global physical phenomenon that is a side effect of building the modern world." ®
Get our [20]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aOktlqRtkfzOahuML6s3nAAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aOktlqRtkfzOahuML6s3nAAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aOktlqRtkfzOahuML6s3nAAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/14/ai_datacenters_coal/
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aOktlqRtkfzOahuML6s3nAAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/challenges/fossil-fuels/coal/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/06/datacenters_set_to_emit_3x/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aOktlqRtkfzOahuML6s3nAAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.ft.com/content/6e4193a0-aaf3-4752-8b45-696eae57ba18
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/12/fire_up_gas_turbines_ai_race/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/27/datacenter_water_challenge/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/22/georgia_datacenter_pushback/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/30/datacenter_lobby_eu_efficiency/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/07/ags_sue_trump_wind_energy_freeze/
[15] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/20/trump-says-us-will-not-approve-solar-or-wind-power-projects.html
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/26/renewables_vs_smr_datacenter/
[17] http://www.theregister.com/2025/09/16/small_modular_reactors_2026/
[18] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/12/fire_up_gas_turbines_ai_race/
[19] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/microsoft_natural_gas_ai/
[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
And?
I am sure this will shock some people but the overall concern is generating enough electricity and providing enough energy.
Re: And?
Did you learn that on your Master's Degree in Burger-Flipping?
Re: And?
For deepfake videos and crypto currencies?
A major hurdle in CO2 extraction is the energy cost of doing so. So instead we just burn coal to create more heat in deserts?
Re: And?
@LogicGate
"A major hurdle in CO2 extraction is the energy cost of doing so"
If it costs more energy to extract co2 does that mean we need to generate more?
"So instead we just burn coal to create more heat in deserts?"
To provide enough energy for demand when it is the best option, it seems so. For the example in the article the power generators already exist but for some reason were being decommissioned yet it seems they are still in working order. So it does make sense to use them.
Re: And?
If we can't burn coal and heat the atmosphere to power datacenters which store cat videos and run AI girlfriends, we're going to get left behind.
Re: And?
JFC the Chinese are going to run over us, basic strategic thinking is now "woke."
When this dumb fuck is put into the history books next to Yeltsin this will be one part of the "economic fallout" section.
What a deeply pathetic nation this is.
Childhood vaccination is in question. Actually improving the lives of citizens and giving them jobs and dignity is out of the question.
But restarting coal plants to get juice for LLMs to literally burn is going to do what exactly?
People are moving into *gold* instead of USD because they don't trust the gimp in charge not to nuke the Fed.
US datacenters are experiencing a significant shift toward coal-powered energy
Good
Re: US datacenters are experiencing a significant shift toward coal-powered energy
To the contrary, the US should be powering its data centres with new nuclear reactors and green energy. Even in Texas, there's been surge in profitable new private sector solar farms that don't even require public subsidies.
Re: US datacenters are experiencing a significant shift toward coal-powered energy
It's completely mind boggling.
I realize "derrr one the libs" but jfc. Coal mining is miserable, dangerous and expensive when there's jobs in it. At least nat gas is a byproduct of petroleum refining that wouldn't be used otherwise, some level of efficiency there.
Let's hasten the demise of AI.
As there is no ROI, it is a security risk and damages your credibility amongst your customers, there is no reason why corporates cannot include 'Not using AI' as part of their basic ethics package, alongside avoiding what they call 'modern slavery', recycling, paying minimum wage and not discriminating.
You want to stand out, come out and ban the use of AI in your company. Good for your reputation, reduces your costs and risks, and helps save the planet.
Anything that bursts the AI bubble sooner has got to be a good thing.
When you have government subsidy - coal is cheap
[1]Company bids less than a penny per ton in biggest US coal sale in over a decade
Wonder what would happen if the Chinese government sold 187Million tons of coal at 0.1C/ton to a Chinese company
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1NXW3M?ocid=sapphireappshare