News: 1756992610

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Linux Lite relief: 7.6 keeps it simple, shiny, and mostly slim

(2025/09/04)


Linux Lite 7.6 is the latest, slightly updated release of this technologically moderate distro from New Zealand.

[1]Linux Lite 7.6 leaves the core Ubuntu 24.04.3 OS largely untouched, but selectively updates the supplied software collection. With good documentation, lots of helpful tweaks, and blissfully free of both Snap and Flatpak, there's a lot to like.

[2]

Linux Lite 7.6, with its Welcome app and the Start menu open. No mess, no fuss, no nonsense

We [3]reviewed Linux Lite 7.0 back in June 2024, and this version isn't massively different. It's based on [4]Ubuntu 24.04.3 , the third update for the latest LTS version that came out last July, and mostly the new version of Linux Lite leaves that core OS well alone. It still uses kernel 6.8, the same that Ubuntu shipped with last year, and retains the same version of the same desktop, [5]Xfce 4.18 , which came out at the end of 2022. As [6]Bert Lance said: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

The more visible components that you actually work with have been updated, though. For instance, it has the latest [7]LibreOffice 25.8 and Google Chrome 140. It does still supply some older releases of other things, though, such as Thunderbird 128 and GIMP 2.10.

Xfce is the only desktop on offer, but it's a solid choice. It's been configured with a conventional-style taskbar at the bottom, and it comes with replacement themes, including icons and wallpapers and a choice of light or dark mode. We often read criticisms of Xfce's dowdy looks, but here it looks fresh and modern (and flat, of which we're less fond). As ever, it comes with a wide range of small accessories and tools to make life easier, which even extends to a snazzy bash shell prompt.

[8]

New for this release is a [9]documentation wiki , which has extensive instructions to help new users navigate the system. We especially appreciate helpful advice, such as how to disable Secure Boot. The main wiki page contains a lot of different info, all squeezed together onto one page, and we feel more organization would help – but even so, it's much better than what most distros provide.

[10]FreeBSD Project isn't ready to let AI commit code just yet

[11]RefreshOS 2.5: The Debian remix that borrows from every desk in the house

[12]AmiBrowser brings 21st century web to 20th century Amigas

[13]GhostBSD 25.02 adds 'Gershwin' desktop for a Mac-like twist

Another thing we suspect many will like is that neither Snap nor Flatpak are installed. There is, however, the Lite Software tool, which has a curated list of useful extras, from Audacity to Zoom.

[14]

The built-in Software Store mixes FOSS and proprietary freeware, but it has all the essentials

When we first looked at [15]Linux Lite 6.0 over three years ago, we commented that it was pretty solid but not notably lightweight. Times have changed, mostly for the worse, and these days its 3.18 GB download is relatively modest. It's about half the size of Ubuntu 25.04, which we [16]described as a pudgy puffin , and a gigabyte smaller than Xubuntu. It takes about 12 GB of disk space, which isn't sleek but isn't that bad for 2025, and still only uses about 850 MB of RAM at idle, which is good going by contemporary standards.

Its biggest limitation is that the distro still does not support version-to-version upgrades. Older releases of Linux Lite 7.x can upgrade to this one, but not from 6.x. This used to be true of some other Ubuntu-based distros, but Linux Mint added an upgrade tool years ago, and [17]Zorin OS 16.3 gained one back in 2023. This is a key weakness, which the distro maintainers need to fix. However, as Windows replacements for Linux newbies go, this is an excellent choice. ®

Get our [18]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.linuxliteos.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=9576

[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/09/03/linlite_7-6-welcome.jpg

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/10/linux_lite_70_arrives/

[4] https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/noble-numbat-point-release-changes/47565/4

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/08/forthcoming_xfce_418_on_show/

[6] https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/bert-lance-1931-2013/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/21/libreoffice_258/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aLm3k5rfVMhPMUteye6DuQAAAFQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[9] https://wiki.linuxliteos.com/en/home

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/03/freebsd_project_update_no_ai/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/29/refreshos_25/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/28/amiga_web_browser_amibrowser/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/27/ghostbsd_2502/

[14] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/09/03/linlite_7-6_sw.jpg

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/01/linux_lite_60/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/04/ubuntu_2504_beta/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/09/ubuntu_mint_zorin_updates/

[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Modern bloat

VoiceOfTruth

>> still only uses about 850 MB of RAM at idle

Windows XP ran idle in less that 128MB. It's crazy that everything is so bloated today. That includes Linux.

Re: Modern bloat

Joe W

RAM use in idle is not really a good measure. The machine does attempt to do all sorts of pre fetching and stuff, essentially filling up memory with (hopefully) useful stuff.

What would be interesting is testing the lowest amount of RAM you can get away with.

Re: Modern bloat

alain williams

One other measure that I would like is: lowest RAM with a lot of swap space. The point is that there seems to be a lot of cr*p that is loaded and almost never does anything, so let that float out to swap and leave RAM for the web browser/whatever. Yes: if one of these things has to run the system will thrash for a bit but if it does not happen too often the machine will be usable.

One thing that we have to be thankful to MS for is that in recent years Windows needed 4GB to be usable so all recent machines had at least 4GB which is enough for a modern Linux desktop.

Before that (in the Windows XP days) MS charged more if the machine had more than 2GB RAM, so there are plenty of old machines like this - I want to try Linux Lite on one of them; my normal distro for laptops or upgrading friends' Win 10 machines is Linux Mint; Debian for my own desktop.

Re: Modern bloat

m4r35n357

My Alpine desktop on Raspberry Pi 5 is idling at 723MB under XFCE (1920x1080 video).

Have you considered how much video resolutions contribute to this figure?

Bloat to me is a system that cannot run _everything_ it needs to in 4GB (the most memory on any of my machines is 8GB). That is only because browsers need a lot of RAM, otherwise I would say 2GB.

There are many who will not look at any machine under 32GB. Blame _them_.

Re: Modern bloat

Neil Barnes

Vague memories of processor lessons suggest that a _big_ chunk of memory is required for the page tables to handle 64-bit systems... is that still a thing?

Re: Modern bloat

ThatOne

> Windows XP ran idle in less that 128MB

I might be talking nonsense, but XP was a 32-bit OS, which means it could only address 2 GB memory for the system and 2 GB for the user programs. Nowadays OSses are 64-bit, and can afford to load a lot more things into memory, things which XP would need to swap to disk.

After all, DOS couldn't address more than 640 K B, and compared to that XP was a total memory hog... :-D

Re: Modern bloat

VoiceOfTruth

>> XP was a 32-bit OS

There was a 64 bit version too. It idled at about 150MB, as I recall.

My point is the resource use seems to have grown hugely and there is no discernible improvement to the end user.

Re: Modern bloat

ThatOne

> There was a 64 bit version too.

Yeah, I know, I had it. It was kind of kinky, but I needed the additional memory, even the 3 GB given by the "/LARGEADDRESSAWARE" switch weren't enough.

Resources have grown, but our expectations too: Ever tried to stream a 4k video on XP?... :-D

Good beginning

Anonymous Coward

>> blissfully free of both Snap and Flatpak,

Now if they would only get rid of systemD...

Anon to avoid flame damage

Kev99

Every Linux review I see seems to ignore how fat the distro is. By fat, I mean 1) Minimum RAM; 2) Minimum disk space; 3) Minimum CPU. Not everyone will or can afford to ditch a perfectly working pc for a new os even if the os is free. I have Puppy FOSS Linux running on an old Toshiba netbook. I does fine for our purposes with 2GB RAM, 250 GB HDD, and an Atom CPU running at 1.6GHz.

Save gas, don't use the shell.