News: 1755557258

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Molten salt nuclear reactors slated to power Google datacenters in 2030

(2025/08/19)


Oak Ridge, Tennessee, could be home to a molten salt reactor once again if Google-backed Kairos Power has its way.

The small modular reactor startup, along with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), one of the largest utilities in the country, aim to bring 50 megawatts of nuclear power to Tennessee.

The Chocolate Factory, which tapped the start-up last northern Autumn to provide up to 500 megawatts of carbon-free atomic power, [1]said on Monday it would be among the first to benefit from Kairos' Hermes 2 demonstration plant when it comes online in 2030. The twin reactor facility is set to supply power to Google's datacenters in Tennessee and Alabama.

[2]

Kairos is also setting up a simulator at the University of Tennessee to train technicians to operate the facility.

[3]

[4]

The city of just over 34,000 is a fitting location for the plant, as Kairos' reactor tech can trace its roots back to the Department of Energy's (DoE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory's (ORNL) molten salt reactor [5]experiments of the 1950s and '60s.

Built in 1954, ORNL's Aircraft Reactor Experiment was first to demonstrate the viability of a molten salt reactor. While the design proved too heavy – and presumably too dangerous – for flight, just over ten years later a scaled-up version of the reactor went critical, operating for four years until 1969.

[6]

Kairos' reactor designs are based on a similar concept, and will [7]use Tri-structural ISOtropic (TRISO) fuel pellets, which are essentially a tiny grain of uranium encased in carbon and ceramic. Fuel-makers press the pellets into billiard ball-sized pebbles which are cooled by molten fluoride salts, just like ORNL's earlier reactor experiments.

Power is generated indirectly by pulling heat from the salts to power a steam generator and turbine.

Google isn't the only hyperscaler to embrace small modular reactors (SMRs). Oracle [8]plans to deploy at least three SMRs to power a gigawatt-scale datacenter, and Amazon has tapped X-Energy SMR tech to offset its growing datacenter footprint.

[9]

However, Google's choice of SMR startups could give it a leg up as Kairos is one of the few SMR startups to get Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) [10]approval to construct a pair of 35 megawatt test reactors. However the NRC will still have to sign off on the facility before the plant can start generating power.

[11]Physicist models new use for nuclear waste: Turning it into super-rare fusion fuel

[12]Reckon you can put a nuclear reactor on the Moon?

[13]Who made the demo list for Trump's fast-track nuclear reactor scheme?

[14]UK.gov's nuclear strategy is 'slow, inefficient, and costly'

Just because the NRC has signed off on the project doesn't mean Kairos will build it. As you may recall, back in 2023 the NRC [15]signed off on NuScale's reactor, clearing the way for a six-reactor 462-megawatt power plant in Utah. Unfortunately the project was later [16]abandoned after several municipalities pulled out of the deal, citing rising costs.

And according to researchers at Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, SMRs may never be cost effective. In a report [17]published last year, they argued that the tech was "still too expensive, too slow to build, and too risky to play a significant role in transitioning away from fossil fuels."

But with energy availability a major reason for slow cloud and hyperscale datacenter expansions, the economics could be changing. Over the past year, we've seen major cloud providers invest heavily in nuclear. Microsoft even went so far as to finance the [18]re-ignition of the shuttered Three Mile Island Unit 1 reactor while Amazon is currently [19]building out a datacenter campus alongside the Susquehanna nuclear plant. ®

Get our [20]Tech Resources



[1] https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/sustainability/google-first-advanced-nuclear-reactor-project-with-kairos-power-and-tennessee-valley-authority/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aKP22AjFu5hWFzbG10lsegAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aKP22AjFu5hWFzbG10lsegAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aKP22AjFu5hWFzbG10lsegAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/11/nuclear_molten_salt/

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aKP22AjFu5hWFzbG10lsegAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/15/google_kairos_smr_nuclear_investment/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/11/oracle_1gw_datacenter_smr_plan/

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aKP22AjFu5hWFzbG10lsegAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://kairospower.com/external_updates/nuclear-regulatory-commission-approves-construction-permits-for-hermes-2-demonstration-plant/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/18/physicist_nuclear_waste_fusion_fuel/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/15/nuclear_moon/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/14/us_doe_names_firms_that/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/12/ukgovs_nuclear_strategy_is_slow/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/24/us_nuclear_reactor_approval/

[16] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/nuscale-power-uamps-agree-terminate-nuclear-project-2023-11-08/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/03/small_modular_reactor_criticism/

[18] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/20/three_mile_island_nuclear_plant_microsoft_ai/

[19] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/12/amazon_talen_nuclear_deal/

[20] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Reliable sources?

Jellied Eel

And according to researchers at Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, SMRs may never be cost effective. In a report published last year, they argued that the tech was "still too expensive, too slow to build, and too risky to play a significant role in transitioning away from fossil fuels."

Well, they would say that, wouldn't they?

https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/institute-for-energy-economics-and-financial-analysis/

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis has received funding from aligned and left-of-center organizations including the Charles and Helen Brown Foundation, the ClimateWorks Foundation, Climate Imperative, the Energy Foundation, Heinz Endowments, the Just Transition Fund, the KR Foundation, the Laudes Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, the Mertz-Gilmore Foundation, Oceankind, the Park Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Family Fund, the Sandler Foundation, and the Wallace Global Fund.

I love the smell of astroturfing in the morning. But a grand sounding 'Institute' that's run out of a shared office building above Rozi's Wine House in Lakewood Ohio. What is becoming increasingly apparent is that the 'renewables' the IEEFA shill for are the expensive & risky solutions.

Re: Reliable sources?

Ace2

Renewables are risky, but letting Microsoft fire up Three Mile Island again is somehow peachy.

How about you go choke on a 9V battery? It would do wonders for the comment section here.

Re: Reliable sources?

Benegesserict Cumbersomberbatch

Yes, those notoriously left-of-centre Rockefellers, with their rabidly pro-environment allies at Standard Oil.

I hope it works well

bombastic bob

The advantages of molten salt reactors include lower primary system pressure, which would help prevent corrosion cracking issues in the boilers. It would enable use of different kinds of materials that can be somewhat thinner and less expensive than a PWR system that likely has pressure above 2000 psi to avoid boiling at temperatures above 600 degrees F. Molten salt may also have less danger from coolant leaks, as leaking salt would likely turn into a solid as it cools. Lack of water in the primary might also limit activation of corrosion byproducts (like Fe59 becoming Co60 as rust particles pass through an intense neutron flux).

Obviously would have its own unique problems but these have prob'ly been worked out for the most part.

Anyway I hope they can make such reactors "modular enough" to make rapid construction plausible and low operating costs likely.

I'm often asked the question, "Do you think there is extraterrestrial intelli-
gence?" I give the standard arguments -- there are a lot of places out there,
and use the word *billions*, and so on. And then I say it would be astonishing
to me if there weren't extraterrestrial intelligence, but of course there is as
yet no compelling evidence for it. And then I'm asked, "Yeah, but what do you
really think?" I say, "I just told you what I really think." "Yeah, but
what's your gut feeling?" But I try not to think with my gut. Really, it's
okay to reserve judgment until the evidence is in.
-- Carl Sagan