hands on OpenAI's GPT-5, unveiled on Thursday, is supposed to be the company's flagship model, offering better reasoning and more accurate responses than previous-gen products. But when we asked it to draw maps and timelines, it responded with answers from an alternate dimension.

After seeing some complaints about GPT-5 hallucinating in infographics on social media, we asked the LLM to "generate a map of the USA with each state named." It responded by giving us a drawing that has the sizes and shapes of the states correct, but has many of the names misspelled or made up.

[1]

Map of the US drawn by GPT-5 - Click to enlarge

As you can see, Oregon is "Onegon," Oklahoma is named "Gelahbrin," and Minnesota is "Ternia." In fact, all of the state names are wrong except for Montana and Kansas. Some of the letters aren't even legible.

To see if GPT-5 only has a problem with the US, we asked it to "generate a map of South America" with all countries named. This time, it got more of the names right, but still had some noteworthy mistakes.

[2]

Map of South America as drawn by GPT-5 - Click to enlarge

It got the largest countries: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru correct. However, it shows Ecuador as "Felizio," Suriname as "Guriname," and Uruguay as "Urigim." It also puts the name of Chile on top of southern Argentina.

We were also interested in finding out whether this fact-drawing problem would affect a drawing that is not a map. So we prompted GPT-5 to "draw a timeline of the US presidency with the names of all presidents."

[3]

Timeline of US presidents as drawn by GPT-5 - Click to enlarge

The timeline graphic GPT-5 gave us back was the least accurate of all the graphics we asked for. It only lists 26 presidents, the years aren't in order and don't match each president, and many of the presidential names are just plain made up.

The first three lines of the image are mostly correct, though Jefferson is misspelled and the third president did not serve in 1931. However, we end up with our fourth president being "Willian H. Brusen," who lived in the White House back in 1991. We also have Henbert Bowen serving in 1934 and Benlohin Barrison in 1879.

Strangely, when we asked GPT-5 to "make an infographic showing all the actors who played James Bond in order," it gave us perfect text. We should note that the first time we gave it this prompt, it provided the answers in text with no image. But when we followed up with "you didn't draw an image," it gave us something quite good. We'll forgive it for leaving Connery's role in "Diamonds Are Forever" (1971) out of this.

[4]

James Bond timeline as drawn by GPT-5 - Click to enlarge

It's worth noting that GPT-5 is more than capable of providing the correct answers in text form for the queries where it failed at drawing accurate images. When we asked for a list of all US states and all South American countries, it was perfectly accurate. The list it gave us of US presidents was good, except that it ends with Joe Biden shown as "2021-present." That's probably indicative of GPT-5 [5]not being trained on the most recent news. OpenAI has not disclosed the training dates for this model, but the period probably predates President Trump's second term.

We don't know exactly why GPT-5 is having problems with the names of places and people when it draws infographics. We've asked OpenAI for a comment and we'll update this article if we receive a response.

[6]OpenAI's GPT-5 is here with up to 80% fewer hallucinations

[7]How to run OpenAI's new gpt-oss-20b LLM on your computer

[8]OpenAI removes ChatGPT self-doxing option

[9]OpenAI's new model can't believe that Trump is back in office

However, we do have some theories. Image generators train on other images using a process called diffusion, where they take the training pics, turn them into noise, and then reconstruct them. Accurately generating text in image outputs is challenging for all image generators. Not that long ago, text generated by diffusion models was more likely to turn out looking like hieroglyphics or some alien language than anything resembling English.

Case in point, when we asked Bing Image Creator to create a map of the US with state names, we got similarly bad output.

[10]

US map as drawn by Bing Image Creator - Click to enlarge

Even worse, Bing referred to the country as the "United States Ameriicca." It also failed the James Bond test. Just who does it think those men with white hair are?

[11]

James Bond timeline as drawn by Bing Image Creator - Click to enlarge

Interestingly, Anthropic's Claude LLM got all of the state names right, but instead of drawing a PNG or a JPG file, it created an SVG using code. The output doesn't look like a map as much as a list of states in boxes.

[12]

Map of the US as drawn by Claude, using code - Click to enlarge

Interestingly, when we asked GPT-5 to use its canvas feature to bypass image generation and create a map in code, we got an accurate response after giving it some encouragement. That's likely because it was using code generation, which is a completely different process.

[13]

Map of the US as drawn by GPT-5, using code - Click to enlarge

Google Gemini did a worse job with its state names than GPT-5 did. On the map below, not even one state is correct.

[14]

Map of the US as drawn by Gemini - Click to enlarge

On the bright side, Gemini created a wonderful James Bond infographic for us. In fact, it gets extra credit for including not only the lead actors in the films, but more than two dozen recurring stars on a timeline.

[15]

James Bond timeline as drawn by Gemini - Click to enlarge

Clearly, drawing text within images is hard and neither GPT-5 nor its competitors have gotten it correct yet . . . unless you ask them about James Bond.®

Get our [16]Tech Resources



[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map1.jpg

[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map2.jpg

[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map3.jpg

[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map4.jpg

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/06/openai_model_election_disinformation/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/07/openai_gpt_5/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/07/run_openai_gpt_oss_locally/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/01/openai_removes_chatgpt_selfdoxing_option/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/06/openai_model_election_disinformation/

[10] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map5.jpg

[11] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map6.jpg

[12] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map7.jpg

[13] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map8.jpg

[14] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map9.jpg

[15] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/08/map10.jpg

[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/