News: 1754398255

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Uncle Sam floats tracking tech to keep AI chips out of China

(2025/08/05)


The Trump administration wants better ways to track the location of chips, as part of attempts to prevent advanced AI accelerator hardware from getting into Chinese hands.

Washington wants to equip semiconductors with location-tracking capabilities, and is keen on working with the industry to accomplish this, according to a senior White House official.

The purpose is to enable the US to follow where shipments of key products for AI development, such as Nvidia GPUs, are actually ending up, so as to aid efforts to prevent smuggling of the components into China.

[1]

"There is discussion about potentially the types of software or physical changes you could make to the chips themselves to do better location-tracking," Michael Kratsios told [2]Bloomberg .

[3]

[4]

Kratsios is understood to be one of those behind the White House's [5]AI Action Plan unveiled last month.

However, he said he has not so far spoken directly with either Nvidia or AMD, the other major supplier of advanced GPUs used in AI training.

[6]

The move follows the introduction of legislation in the [7]US Senate and the [8]House of Representatives in May to require the Department of Commerce to mandate that certain advanced chips (or products containing them) be equipped with a "location verification mechanism" to detect if shipments are being diverted after export.

Neither of the two bills specified exactly how the tracking mechanisms would be expected to work. However, exporting companies would be responsible for reporting violations to the Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in the event tracking is tampered with or the chips show up in places they shouldn't.

Such a move is unlikely to play well with Beijing, which has [9]already grilled Nvidia over allegations of backdoors in the company's designed-for-China H20 GPU chips that might allow US security services to monitor or remotely disable them.

[10]

America's ever more elaborate attempts to curb China's AI expertise are perhaps based on claims that it is [11]just a year or two behind the US in such technology, and recent reports that an estimated [12]$1 billion worth of high-end Nvidia GPUs have made it to the Chinese black market, despite Washington's strict export regulations.

[13]Beijing summons Nvidia over alleged backdoors in China-bound AI chips

[14]Taxman picks up $140M tab after Cadence fined for China export violations

[15]China proves that open models are more effective than all the GPUs in the world

[16]Republican calls out Trump admin's decision to resume GPU sales to China

In a related move, Senators Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass, and Mike Rounds, R-South Dakota, wrote to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Secretary of State Marco Rubio urging the administration to retain strict rules that discourage companies from offshoring their AI infrastructure.

The [17]letter [PDF], sent July 31, argues that America's edge in AI stems not just from software innovation but from the massive domestic buildout of datacenters and GPU clusters powering AI development.

"AI is infrastructure," they wrote, warning that offshoring this infrastructure – tempted by foreign subsidies – could shift the center of gravity for frontier AI development away from the US and into the hands of rivals like China. The senators are calling for the forthcoming replacement to the administration's Diffusion Rule to impose robust security requirements on any overseas AI facilities and to ensure the bulk of advanced AI compute remains on US soil. ®

Get our [18]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aJIqiFKwEP6FaQtMSQRmhQAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-05/us-explores-better-location-trackers-for-ai-chips-official-says

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aJIqiFKwEP6FaQtMSQRmhQAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aJIqiFKwEP6FaQtMSQRmhQAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/24/ai_trump_plan_/

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aJIqiFKwEP6FaQtMSQRmhQAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/09/senator_fights_chip_smuggling/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/15/gpu_tracking_house/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/31/beijing_nvidia_backdoors/

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aJIqiFKwEP6FaQtMSQRmhQAAAI8&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/20/china_us_chip_competition/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/24/nvidia_chips_china_whoops/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/31/beijing_nvidia_backdoors/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/29/cadence_fine_export_violations/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/19/openai_us_china/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/18/trump_gpu_china/

[17] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/08/05/warren_rounds_letter_to_rubio_lutnick_on_ai_offshoring_final.pdf

[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



A different law is needed

may_i

One which prevents legislators from proposing childish and unworkable laws relating to technology that that have zero understanding of.

Re: A different law is needed

b0llchit

You mean, a law that would make lawmakers liable for their laws? I can suggest some very creative penalties to go with that.

LOL

Ross 12

that is all.

This finally proves, that Dear Leader does NOT use AI to create policies...

EricM

Because NO AI would be deranged enough to propose adding location tracking to actual chips...

So all TRUMP critics, who accused him on putting tariffs on penguins by stupidly following AI advice, must be WRONG.

No, really, this White House degenerates more and more into a comedy sitcom and destroys all reputation and impression of competence the U.S. might have had in the past...

Empire of the Pussycat

I hope they do it.

Because it'll turn out bad for them.

And all powered by unicorn shit

Jason Bloomberg

I am hoping all this nonsense will be over in less than four years but I fear not as Democrats under Biden were just as anti-China as Trump is.

More phone-homery?

Alien Doctor 1.1

And what other info/data will be sent back to the UarSeofA?

And Next Year ...

vtcodger

Next year Congress will require that all cocaine molecules exported from Latin America be internet and GPS enabled and report their location to the FBI hourly.

AI chip as a service

thames

If this goes ahead, it's possible that companies like Nvidia may implement it by putting a module in all their chips which requires regularly updated licensing certificates. When the certificate is about to expire, the owner downloads an encrypted and digitally signed certificate request from each chip and forwards these to Nvidia along with payment. Nvidia then compares the serial numbers in the requests to their list of authorized users and who the payment came from (via a list of authorized banks only, who would be in charge of verifying the identity and location of the originator of the funds), and then sends back a bundle of updated encrypted and digitally signed license certificates which the user then uploads to each corresponding chip. You no longer would buy an Nvidia AI chip, you would only license it.

The above may not be how they end up doing it, but I suspect that something like the above would meet the intent of the legislation.

I can't imagine the Chinese government allowing putting an American kill switch into their AI infrastructure, so that would basically kill Nvidia sales in China, and probably a lot of other countries too.

<knghtbrd> rcw: Oh yay---I haven't been involved in a good flamewar in at
least ... 5 minutes!