News: 1754306107

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Untangling the Jeff Bezos web: Who pays for the billionaire's space lust?

(2025/08/04)


In the beginning there was Jeff Bezos. He created Amazon in 1994 and became filthy rich in the decades that followed, reaching a net worth exceeding $241 billion in 2025.

Bezos has used a portion of his accumulated wealth on such things as The Washington Post newspaper (2013), a divorce (2019), and a Venice destination wedding for his second wife (2025), among other splurges.

I've got way too much cash, thinks Jeff Bezos. Hmmm, pay more tax? Pay staff more? Nah, let's just go into space [1]READ MORE

Yet Blue Origin, his privately held aerospace company, has been his most ambitious and costly endeavor outside of Amazon, one that has consumed increasingly large amounts of money since he founded it almost 25 years ago. Casual observers conflate Blue Origin with Amazon's Project Kuiper broadband satellite network and it's easy to see the confusion, since Bezos founded both. But while there are connective threads between the two, the companies march to very different beats and it remains unanswered if Blue Origin will have as great an impact on the world as Amazon.

Revenge of the space nerd

Bezos has been a devout space advocate for decades. As high school valedictorian, he told his graduating class he dreamed of the day when mankind would colonize space and leave Earth to be a big nature preserve, as reported by [2]The Atlantic in 2019. His beliefs remained steadfast throughout his time at Princeton University, where he became president of the local [3]Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS) chapter.

I went to college around the same time frame as Bezo and vividly remember the local SEDS chapter. They would talk about the construction of large O'Neill cylinders for the colonization of space, while the rest of us were trying to pass classes and figure out how to do something useful with the first IBM PCs in a time long before the internet became a mainstream concern about a decade later.

Rocket companies aren't cheap. Fortunately, Bezos, Amazon's founder and [4]CEO until 2021 , has a ton of Amazon stock and uses it to fund Blue Origin and his other interests. Unlike SpaceX, which continues to go to the private equity markets early and often, Blue Origin remains tightly held with Bezos as primary shareholder and funder.

[5]

Exactly how much of his cash has gone into the company is subject to considerable speculation. Back in 2017, Bezos [6]said in an interview he would sell off $1 billion in stock per year to fund the company's activities.

[7]

[8]

Given Amazon's massive valuation and his personal net worth, Bezos has considerable resources to fund Blue Origin's many hardware projects. These include the New Shepard suborbital rocket operation out of West Texas, the New Glenn reusable rocket to put satellite constellations into orbit, the Blue Moon lunar lander program, and some more humble schemes to build a larger satellite bus/tug and a smaller commercial space station built in cooperation with other firms.

[9]SpaceX scores $5.9B lion's share of Space Force launch contracts

[10]Jeff Bezos can now taunt Elon Musk: I'm building a moon rover for NASA, when can Tesla do that?

[11]FAA confirms it's testing Starlink, maybe for tasks Elon says Verizon is doing badly

[12]Amazon's Kuiper secures license to take on Starlink in the UK

[13]Words alone won't get the stars and stripes to Mars

The biggest criticism of Blue Origin has been its lack of speed to put New Glenn on the pad so it can launch satellites for others. First announced in September 2016, the rocket didn't make its inaugural flight until January 2025, far later than its original expected 2020 launch date. While new launch vehicles often "move to the right" with various issues, New Glenn has had the speed of a tortoise compared to the hares at SpaceX.

Companies that planned to launch on New Glenn have had to turn to SpaceX and other launch providers. One of those companies is, ironically, Amazon.

Amazon's Project Kuiper – a for-profit world apart

SpaceX's Starlink Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite network has demonstrated the technology and market demand for turnkey, high-speed, low-latency broadband around the world in markets ranging from unconnected homes unreachable by other affordable means to mobile users on planes, trains, and automobiles, along with governmental and national security applications.

In 2019, Amazon created the Project Kuiper subsidiary and declared it would spend $10 billion to build the infrastructure to deploy and operate a constellation of 3,236 satellites, including a mass-market, low-cost flat panel phased-array antenna to connect millions of people and companies around to the network. As a publicly traded company, Amazon had to justify the expense of this project to the board and its shareholders and show that it could provide a return on investment.

Bezos beams up batch two as Project Kuiper plays catch-up with Starlink [14]READ MORE

In addition, as a public company, Amazon couldn't play favorites with its former CEO and current executive chairman. Activist shareholders see a down quarter, get worked up about perceived self-dealing, the stock price tanks and nobody is happy. It had to take a vendor-neutral stance, so Amazon ended up distributing launches among United Launch Alliance (ULA), Blue Origin, Europe's ArianeGroup, and yes, SpaceX. Since Blue Origin continues to move at an unhurried pace to get into a steady launch cadence, most of the initial Kuiper launches will be performed by ULA and SpaceX.

The major financial contrasts between Project Kuiper and SpaceX's Starlink are essentially threefold. First, Amazon's $10 billion commitment to Kuiper, while substantial, is nothing compared to the continued yearly capital investments into its datacenter resources. The company recently [15]indicated it would spend on the order of $118 billion on capital expenditures this year, a large portion of which will go into building out tech infrastructure for AI demand. SpaceX is a different beast: Starlink is the monetary lifeline necessary to keep Elon Musk's space company in the short-term business of building bigger rockets and the longer-term one to colonize Mars.

Finally, Project Kuiper will play an interesting and significant role, providing worldwide connectivity for new consumer customers and a complementary one to its government and enterprise customers who need to be connected to cloud services anywhere in the world. Could Amazon Prime customers at a certain spending level get a free Kuiper dish and discounted broadband service? It's certainly possible.

[16]

But the important thing to keep in mind is that, while Bezos holds executive positions at both Amazon and Blue Origin, Amazon is a large, publicly traded company that can't simply throw money into its founder's whims. ®

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2018/05/03/bezos_billions_space/

[2] https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/11/what-jeff-bezos-wants/598363/

[3] https://seds.org/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/03/jeff_bezos_jassy/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aJDZCNVLpITvPuNhV1D0kAAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/science/blue-origin-rocket-jeff-bezos-amazon-stock.html

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aJDZCNVLpITvPuNhV1D0kAAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aJDZCNVLpITvPuNhV1D0kAAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/07/spacex_space_force_contracts/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/26/firefly_aerospac_honeybee_rover/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/27/faa_starlink_test/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/04/ofcom_amazon_kuiper_license/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/21/usa_going_to_mars/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/24/second_project_kuiper_launch/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/31/amazon_earnings_q2_2025/

[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aJDZCNVLpITvPuNhV1D0kAAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Financial engineering

Jellied Eel

But the important thing to keep in mind is that, while Bezos holds executive positions at both Amazon and Blue Origin, Amazon is a large, publicly traded company that can't simply throw money into its founder's whims.

I think the whole space race for satellite broadband is all rather murkey. At least OneWeb's structure and finances are reasonably clean, but figuring out what's going on with StarLink or Blue Origin/Kuiper is a lot harder. At least Bezos seems to have stepped away from running Amazon, but as you say, still has influence and that might conflict with other investors. Launching the Kuiper constellation is going to be very expensive and transfer a lot of cash from Amazon to Blue Origin.

I also remember as a kid, a rocket launch was a rare and exciting event.. Rare enough to get broadcasters covering them. Now, I can often watch a launch or two every week via YT channels like NASASpaceflight, or get a summary of all the launches via Scott Manley.

Re: Financial engineering

Paul Crawford

I have wondered about SpaceX's finances and just how much they make from the satellite broadband. I know they have largely eaten the market for ship-born data from the GEO players, and the luxury yacht/cruise liners are used to paying quite a lot more than domestic broadband, but as you say it all seems murky.

Re: Financial engineering

Jellied Eel

I know they have largely eaten the market for ship-born data from the GEO players, and the luxury yacht/cruise liners are used to paying quite a lot more than domestic broadband, but as you say it all seems murky.

Yep, they've captured that market thanks to being both a LOT cheaper, and offering more capacity. Which also helped with the IYE (In-Yacht Entertainment) market by being able to do stuff like just having Netflix work. I also saw a report recently that Starlink had supplied 40,000 terminals to Ukraine, so what impact that will have on their finances when that conflict ends. Or what the commercials are around those terminals when some are disposable. So whether is stuck with a 12-month contract even though the terminal's now scrap after being installed on a kamikazi drone. But that could be offset by more customers figuring out Starlink powered drones are kinda useful and Starlink offers those on a cost + usage rather than fixed-length contracts.

Re: Financial engineering

Evilgoat76

All our systems are on pay monthly, no contract. not sure if thats still the case but we frequently stop and star ours ove rthe season. Keeping 15 dishes running year round would be insane when they only get used 6 months a year.

Re: Financial engineering

Jellied Eel

Cheers. I'd wondered if that was the case & read there was a premium for mobile/roaming services.. but less excessive than the mobile operators. Wondered if that also included different terminal kit to withstand a marine environment. Also noticed yachts with 2 dishes, so presumably one for the guests and one for the yacht/crew & contract flexibility is nice if the guest service is only needed during charter season. On the finance side, makes guesstimating revenues a little trickier but Starlink/SpacX don't really break that out in much detail, ie ARPU based on terminals deployed would vary a lot depending if they were on 12 month or PAYG contracts.

Anonymous Coward

The demands of stock markets haven't stopped Elmo from treating "his" companies as personal piggy banks, surely Bezos has noticed that?

"New Glenn has had the speed of a tortoise compared to the hares at SpaceX"

Gene Cash

There are sometimes a few advantages to "move fast and break stuff"

You end up spending a fortune to perfect things (a la NASA SLS and Boeing Starliner) then when it turns out it's still not perfect and blows up anyway, then you've just wasted a lot of time and money.

However there's a difference between coding and flailing at the keyboard. You have to learn to balance things and know when to take a walk around the house. I think Starship is at the "flailing at the keyboard" stage.

Re: "However there's a difference between coding and flailing at the keyboard."

Caver_Dave

I'm told that coding SpaceX style, is like making love on a one night stand:-

Fiddle around until you find something that works

Say its the best they've ever had

And then bugger off with no support

(Not that I've ever had a one night stand.)

If I kiss you, that is an psychological interaction.
On the other hand, if I hit you over the head with a brick,
that is also a psychological interaction.
The difference is that one is friendly and the other is not
so friendly.
The crucial point is if you can tell which is which.
-- Dolph Sharp, "I'm O.K., You're Not So Hot"