US science left out in the cold amid plans to retire Antarctic icebreaker
- Reference: 1753806611
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/07/29/us_icebreaker_funding/
- Source link:
The fate of science in the US has come under scrutiny following proposals to make deep cuts to the budget. The NSF is aiming to get by with much, much less. One staffer told The Register that shrinkage of 65 to 75 percent was on the cards as the agency, responsible for promoting scientific progress and nurturing national talent, adjusts to new realities.
On the chopping block, and lurking in the agency's [1]FY 2026 budget request to Congress [PDF] , is the line "NSF intends to terminate the lease of the research vessel Nathaniel B. Palmer in FY 2026."
[2]
Launched in 1992, the Nathaniel B. Palmer is a 308-foot research ship that can operate all year round in Antarctic waters. It has a crew of 22 and can accommodate 45 scientists and technicians. [3]According to the NSF , it sails an average of 240 days per year.
[4]
Research Vessel Icebreaker Nathaniel B. Palmer (pic: National Science Foundation)
But, if the proposed budget is anything to go by, not for much longer. With no immediate replacement available, the NSF appears set to retire the vessel.
Noting the increases in marine capability from nations such as the UK, China, and Korea, the letter [5]says : "The early loss of the N.B. Palmer is troubling" and highlights the science that has come from the vessel and its predecessors, all of which have "helped grow the US's standing as a leader of international scientific research."
[6]
[7]
"There's no replacement for a dedicated research vessel that can access remote sea ice-covered regions of Antarctica and that allows sampling of the full depth of the ocean and coastal regions on land."
[8]The real reason why Trump is killing the Mauna Loa observatory in Hawai'i
[9]NASA Goddard Center Director quits as agency staffers issue dissent letter
[10]NASA veteran warns Hubble faces death by a hundred cuts
[11]Thousands of NASA senior staffers expected to quit after budget slashed
There is a replacement on the way, but it is not expected to be operational until the 2030s, [12]according to reports . The expectation was that the Nathaniel B. Palmer would be kept operational, but under the proposal, a coverage gap seems almost inevitable. There is also every possibility that the axe might fall on planning for the Palmer's replacement.
[13]Talking to Science , Carlos Moffat, a physical oceanographer at the University of Delaware and one of the organizers of the letter, called the proposal to cut off funding for planning the vessel's successor "a one-two punch."
While plans are afoot to plug the gap with [14]Research Vessel Sikuliaq , a co-organizer of the letter, Julia Wellner, a marine geologist at the University of Houston, called the vessel "wholly unsuited to most of what we do in Antarctica". She called out the lack of berths, reduced icebreaking capabilities, and the potential for diminishing resources devoted to the Arctic (the vessel is currently based in Alaska).
[15]
Although the budget proposal is just that – a proposal – the uncertainty is not ideal for scientists planning research that may or may not happen depending on the fate of the US's Antarctic icebreaker.
The Register asked the NSF to comment on the proposal and letter, but the agency has yet to respond. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/files/00-NSF-FY26-CJ-Entire-Rollup.pdf?VersionId=O06XnbgojADDf9uCPe_MIkjRPBScU1Lt
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aIlEdtJAbqbT_UXxyh5pcAAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/ail/usap-ships-boats#rvib-palmer
[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/07/29/palmer.jpg
[5] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Rk77rTtcZ_LSoqkTXh571_HxpMhfYDzoO6ZkE6ThU3k/edit?tab=t.0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aIlEdtJAbqbT_UXxyh5pcAAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aIlEdtJAbqbT_UXxyh5pcAAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/22/trump_shoots_climate_messenger/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/22/nasa_goddard_resignation/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/21/hubble_astronaut_budget_fears/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/10/nasa_staff_layoffs/
[12] https://www.science.org/content/article/complaints-grow-over-1-billion-u-s-antarctic-icebreaker-design
[13] https://www.science.org/content/article/nsf-plans-abrupt-end-lone-u-s-antarctic-research-icebreaker
[14] https://www.uaf.edu/cfos/sikuliaq/
[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aIlEdtJAbqbT_UXxyh5pcAAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Not MAGA, MAD
Making America Gormless Again?
Ending the lease?
"NSF intends to terminate the lease of the research vessel Nathaniel B. Palmer in FY 2026."
So, if the lease is terminated that implies that the NSF do not own the ship.
Can it therefore continue operations, if funded by a different "body", maybe one that isn't in the US (and hence dependent on the whim of tRump and the majority Republicans in Congress?
Then, if any scientists want to do work on it, they can pay their way.
Re: Ending the lease?
"if any scientists want to do work on it, they can pay their way"
If US scientists ask China or Russia nicely, maybe they'll allow a few of them along on their "research" ships in the Antarctic?
Re: the NSF do not own the ship
" the Palmer, which is owned by Offshore Service Vessels, a marine transport firm,"
(from the linked Science piece)
Maybe Chile would take it on, they've got a local presence and science infrastructure (albeit telescopes).
Or could be time for a crowdfunder, lead by the Boaty McBoatface Foundation!
(Icon for what's happening to the icecap.)
The scientists seem to believe that the replacement vessel in 2030 will actually happen. That sounds like just one more thing to cut they haven't got around to yet.
"There is also every possibility that the axe might fall on planning for the Palmer's replacement."
What ice?
Trump is probably counting on the ice caps thawing (for no apparent reason). Then they won't need an icebreaker.
Trump is making the US into at best a 2nd world nation if not a 3rd world one.
What have the Romans ever done for us?
Industry long ago stopped spending much money on pure research and let government agencies do the science that they can then take and turn into products. The US government does patent a lot of that research so they can control the licensing with preferential pricing for US companies as a way for taxpayers to benefit more than another region such as Asia. Pure research always pays off, but not on a schedule and not in definable amounts so accountants don't like it. If the US deletes science to pay for munitions/armies/social programs, it won't have any of them down the road. Science is something that needs to be a priority all of the time.
Not MAGA, MAD
Making America DIminish