News: 1753691466

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

UK needs to pick up handsets for troubled Emergency Services Network project

(2025/07/28)


The UK government is talking to tech suppliers to provide handsets for the country's emergency services' voice and data network, in a procurement which could be worth up to £925 million ($1.24 billion).

With the publication of a preliminary market engagement notice, the Home Office has kicked off the latest installment in a long and sorry saga that is the Emergency Services Network (ESN), an £11 billion ($14.3 billion) project to provide a voice and data network to the UK's police, ambulance, fire, and coastguard services – one which has been beset by [1]years of delays and billions of pounds overspend [PDF].

In a [2]procurement notice , the central government department said it wants to create a framework deal to provide mobile communication devices for the ESN. Through the Emergency Services Mobile Communications Programme (ESMCP), the Home Office said it had been assessing the devices market for several years and is now inviting suppliers to take part in a preliminary market engagement.

[3]

It promises to give suppliers the opportunity to look at and respond to the detailed technical and service requirements for each of up to six end-user device categories, including rugged handhelds, rugged dual-mode handsets, non-rugged models, intrinsically safe handhelds, featurephones, and fixed vehicle devices.

[4]Britain dusts off idle spectrum for rail and emergency comms

[5]T-Mobile US puts NYC emergency services in the 5G fast lane with network slicing

[6]UK government tech procurement lacks understanding, says watchdog

[7]Government and the latest tech don't mix, says UK civil servant of £11B ESN mess

Within the next few weeks, prospective suppliers will be able to take part in a webinar hosted by the ESMCP. The formal competition is expected to kick off in November with the publication of a tender notice.

The ESN is expected to replace Airwave, the mobile comms systems used by the fire, police, and ambulance services in the UK. Although reliable, Airwave is old and lacks data bandwidth. The Home Office started the program to [8]deliver ESN in 2014 , and hoped to begin using it in 2017, allowing Airwave to be replaced in December 2019. Under current plans, the ESN may not go [9]live before 2029 . Estimated costs have risen from around £6 billion to around £11 billion (from $8 billion to c $15 billion), yet [10]MPs have pointed out even those figures may be optimistic .

[11]

The project has also been the subject of intervention by regulators and legal wrangling. In 2022, the Competition and Markets Authority proposed a [12]price cap on Motorola , which at the time was a supplier to both Airwave and ESN, potentially creating a conflict of interest in making sure the new project ran on time. CMA estimated Motorola stood to make [13]£1.3 billion ($1.75 billion) in excess profits owing to its position.

Motorola later withdrew from ESN, to be [14]replaced by IBM . Its latest appeal to have its Airwave price cap lifted was [15]rejected . ®

Get our [16]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Progress-delivering-the-Emergency-Services-Network.pdf

[2] https://www.find-tender.service.gov.uk/Notice/042507-2025

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aIdKvVKwEP6FaQtMSQQuLQAAAIE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/11/unused_spectrum_rail_esn/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/21/tmobile_5g_network_slicing/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/16/nao_uk_government_tech/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/05/esn_home_offifce_committee/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2014/04/23/emergency_services_network/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2023/04/06/emergency_services_network_2029/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/14/pac_emergency_services_network/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aIdKvVKwEP6FaQtMSQQuLQAAAIE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/17/cma_motorola_airwave/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/22/excess_profits_motorola_airwave/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/17/ibm_esn_contract/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/motorola_reaches_end_of_road/

[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Government tech in a nutshell.

Tron

This process is so slow that by the time it reaches the implementation stage, having already spent a fortune doing very little, all the devices they chose will be obsolete.

Having reduced itself to third world status with Brexit, the UK should do what other 3rd world countries do and work with off-the-shelf phones.

Re: Government tech in a nutshell.

Caver_Dave

Three problems with using mobile phones from a very quick think about it:

1) Mobile networks become saturated very easily, or might be off altogether in an emergency

2) Mobile networks have very patchy real-world coverage in the UK. The operators coverage maps only represent their expectation, and do not reflect the situation on the ground

3) Mobile phones are not intrinsically safe, waterproof, etc. in the cheap form that the public use

Re: Government tech in a nutshell.

Harry Kiri

How and why did you manage to crow-bar Brexit into this comment? You are Klaus Schwab and I claim my 5 pounds.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2084918/WEF-Brexit-data

Will Godfrey

While I agree with you in principle, I think you're quite wrong in regarding the UK as 3rd world. Our {cough} leaders have created a whole new 'otherworld' category.

msknight

Well they're certainly not on this planet. Maybe not even this universe.

10) there is no 10, but it sounded like a nice number :)
-- Wichert Akkerman