NASA hacked hardware of camera orbiting Jupiter – and fixed it
- Reference: 1753160292
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/07/22/nasa_juno_annealing_camera_fix/
- Source link:
As explained in a Monday [1]post , NASA designed the visible light JunoCam to survive for eight orbits of Jupiter – about 400 days – but wasn’t confident it would last much longer as its optical unit is outside the titanium-walled radiation vault that houses the probe’s electronics.
NASA’s pessimism was unfounded as JunoCam worked until Juno’s first 46 orbits, but on the 47th “began showing hints of radiation damage.”
[2]
Boffins at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory thought they knew what was causing the problem – a damaged voltage regulator in JunoCam’s power supply.
[3]
[4]
Flying a new regulator to Juno was not an option, given it was 370 million miles (595 million kms) from Earth.
Mission scientists therefore decided to try annealing – the process of heating a material and then cooling it – as it is known to sometimes fix defects in a material.
[5]
“We knew annealing can sometimes alter a material like silicon at a microscopic level but didn’t know if this would fix the damage,” said JunoCam imaging engineer Jacob Schaffner of Malin Space Science Systems in San Diego, which designed and developed JunoCam and is part of the team that operates it. “We commanded JunoCam’s one heater to raise the camera’s temperature to 77 degrees Fahrenheit – much warmer than typical for JunoCam – and waited with bated breath to see the results.”
[6]Juno's joyride around Jupiter snaps stellar shots of Io
[7]Saturn runs rings around Jupiter
[8]Jupiter's Great Red Spot wobbles like Jell-o, according to Hubble snaps
[9]The Europa Clipper stretches its wings as launch nears
It worked and JunoCam again started producing crisp images – but the camera’s output again degraded.
Mission boffins tried different approaches to processing images from the craft, but none worked.
They therefore tried annealing again, this time turning the heater to maximum, and were again relieved when the trick worked – just in time for the late 2023 [10]flyby of Jovian moon Io .
NASA’s post reveals that the annealing experiments conducted on JunoCam led to further use of the technique “on several Juno instruments and engineering subsystems.” The aerospace agency didn’t say if those efforts succeeded, but Scott Bolton, Juno’s principal investigator from the Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio said they’ve provided useful lessons on very remote spacecraft repair.
[11]
“Juno is teaching us how to create and maintain spacecraft tolerant to radiation, providing insights that will benefit satellites in orbit around Earth,” he said. “I expect the lessons learned from Juno will be applicable to both defense and commercial satellites as well as other NASA missions.”
JunoCam continued to produce quality images until its 74th orbit, when image noise re-appeared.
NASA’s post doesn’t state whether it will again try annealing the camera, or detail the instrument’s fate. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.nasa.gov/missions/juno/nasa-shares-how-to-save-camera-370-million-miles-away-near-jupiter/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aH9hNYsJymEIiDBgnz4onQAAAgA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aH9hNYsJymEIiDBgnz4onQAAAgA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aH9hNYsJymEIiDBgnz4onQAAAgA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aH9hNYsJymEIiDBgnz4onQAAAgA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/02/junocam_io_closeup/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/14/128_more_saturnian_moons/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/11/jupiter_grs_wobbles/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/13/the_europa_clipper_stretches_its/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/02/junocam_io_closeup/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aH9hNYsJymEIiDBgnz4onQAAAgA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: New regulator
"Not with that attitude you can't!"
Re: New regulator
"Does Juno not have an Amazon Prime subscription?"
The courier either leaves a card or the LM7805 you ordered is a LM7905.
Assuming Amazon fulfillment doesn't drop the delivery on the asteroid of the same name.
annealing
That's a very neat fix, well done those engineers.
My circuits sometimes self-anneal without intervention from me and occasionally scorch the desk.
Units error?
77°F is room temperature. That sounds far too low. My CPU is reporting 28°C-31°C, which is 82°F-90°F, right now. Granted, it's running Firefox, but...
77°C is 170°F which does sound like a temperature that would anneal silicon.
I see the JPL press release has 77°F, but I see other ones from 2023 that say 150°F-170°F which is 65°C-77°C.
God knows NASA never makes units errors. Ahem.
Re: Units error?
77 degrees Fahrenheit? how primitive!
Making the best of a bad job
I have the greatest respect for NASA's many scientific achievements.
That being said, I think there is a certain amount of historical revisionism going on here.
Originally the Juno mission was supposed to visit Jupiter and investigate it's magnetic field. It was to have entered an elliptical orbit where it dipped down into the magnetosphere before returning to relative safety. The orbit was to be modified so that it went deeper and deeper into the magnetosphere until destruction.
Something went wrong with a thruster so it is now stuck in its original, relatively safe, orbit.
Originally there was no camera on the craft until a Congressman/Senator (can't be bothered to check which/who) made a fuss and said that NASA must provide pretty pictures.
Don't get me wrong, I have gawped at and enjoyed all of the images/timelapses from Juno as much as the next armchair astronomer. When politicians are redesigning your spacecraft five minutes before takeoff something has gone seriously wrong. (May have been more than five minutes, this is an exaggeration.)
To summarise, Juno should have been irradiated to death many months/years ago.
There shouldn't even have been a camera in the first place.
Some of this may be on Wikipedia, I haven't looked.
Let the downvotes commence.
Marketing has always been at war with the truth.
Re: Making the best of a bad job
To be quite honest: I believe the senator was right. Pretty pictures are important.
Let's face it: people are visually oriented. While it is true that great scientific data has been obtained from spacecraft that sent back nothing but numbers, there's nothing like an image to tell you what it's really like out there. Even hard-core scientists who can interpret the numbers are eager for images. The numbers may be their bread, but the image are the jam. This is even more true for Joe and Jane Public who can't do anything with the numbers but can get excited, or at least interested for a fleeting moment, in pictures that show what the far reaches or the solar system actually look like.
Which is now more important then ever. NASA, in true NASA fashion, has once again pulled off an amazing feat of getting malfunctioning kit going from millons or even billions of miles away, using nothing but brain power and radio signals. Yet these are the guys who are currently facing an administration that wants to trottle them to within an inch of actually shutting them down.
So this is a case when marketing is not at war with the truth; it is a vital element of keeping science going. NASA needs all the PR it can muster right now. So keeping the pictures coming for marketing purposes is a Good Thing.
Towel trick
Many people scoffed at the Xbox red ring of death "towel trick", but that's basically what NASA did here. Well done NASA, anyway.
Someone at NASA must have had a Dell XPS
Had to do this for one of the huge Dell XPS luggables (big screen, dual RAIDed hard drives, can't remember the model number.) Had to bake the graphics card in the oven for a short while, after which it worked fine for the remaining life of the machine. Was a bit concerning for the 10 mins it was in, then the first power up afterwards!
New regulator
“Flying a new regulator to Juno was not an option, given it was 370 million miles (595 million kms) from Earth.”
Well, that’s just defeatist. Does Juno not have an Amazon Prime subscription?
It’s hardly rocket sci… oh.