Trump tax law keeps Bill Gates' nuclear datacenter dreams alive
- Reference: 1752704479
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/07/16/trump_tax_law_bill_gates/
- Source link:
"It wasn't quite the evisceration that a complete lack of believing in climate change might have led to," Gates [1]told clean energy tech publication Cipher News in an interview about Trump's latest plans.
Don't let my door hit you on the way out
Cipher News is set to [2]cease publication on Wednesday after nearly four years of reporting. Breakthrough Energy - a multi-investor clean-tech venture network co-founded by Bill Gates - helped bankroll the site at launch.
But a New York Times [3]report from March shows Breakthrough slashed dozens of its staff to refocus on direct investments. At the time, that pullback reportedly left Cipher scrambling for a new funding source.
Most of the programs that would benefit regular Americans (like wind, solar and EV tax credits) were scrapped when Trump signed it into law, Gates noted, but tax credits for the development of nuclear energy projects survived.
By preserving the incentives, the law keeps nuclear - one of the few remaining zero-carbon sources - in play under Trump. This means there's plenty of opportunity for Gates to [4]sell power from TerraPower, the nuclear startup he's backed for nearly 20 years, to the booming [5]datacenter market - another reason he's likely less concerned about the bill's impact.
"The AI people are chasing some mind-blowing profit streams," Gates said in the interview. The Microsoft founder warned that global electricity demand is set to increase 10 percent over an unspecified period, and companies like TerraPower would be planning to meet those needs.
[6]
TerraPower is working to develop a sodium-cooled small modular nuclear reactor. Its design has neither been tested in the real world, nor certified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Gates claimed in the interview that virtually all of TerraPower's current demand in the US is related to datacenters, and predicted that the AI industry would "fill up our order book for the first 10 to 20 units."
[7]Amazon, Meta, Google sign pledge to triple nuclear power capacity by 2050
[8]Nuclear reactors smaller than a semi truck to be tested in Idaho
[9]With datacenter power crisis looming, US government looks to Constellation
[10]Google plugs AI into nuclear reactor biz – what could possibly go wrong?
Of course, all that requires TerraPower to actually demonstrate a working reactor, something it still has yet to do. Only a single plant has started construction, and even then just the non-nuclear parts, in Wyoming, and it has faced delays due to a [11]lack of available fuel and no reactor design certification. That, naturally, hasn't stopped Nvidia from dumping [12]$650 million into TerraPower despite there being no sign that the reactor will be up before the end of the decade.
Yet TerraPower is already trying to line up potential customers: it [13]signed a non-binding MOU with Washington-state–based Sabey Data Centers to explore installing its reactors at Sabey's current and future datacenter sites, though again we note this requires working reactors.
[14]
When that'll be is anyone's guess - as of writing, the NRC's website indicates "pre-application interactions are being planned" with regards to TerraPower's [15]Molten Chloride Fast Reactor (MCFR) design and "currently engaged in pre-application activities" for the [16]Natrium design.
To make matters more complicated, Gates said in the interview that some reactor components will be coming from overseas.
[17]
"We live in a very uncertain environment," he said. "Is that 0 percent tariff or, I don't know, a 40 percent tariff?"
That's somewhat presumptuous of Bill - those tariffs might be a thing of the past before you get around to building a working reactor. Then again, building a power plant without an approved reactor design or reliable fuel source seems awfully presumptuous, too. ®
Get our [18]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.ciphernews.com/articles/exclusive-bill-gates-on-trumps-big-bill-ai-and-more/
[2] https://www.ciphernews.com/articles/with-time-a-swinging-pendulum-shapes-energy-and-climate-change/
[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/climate/bill-gates-breakthrough-energy-cuts.html
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2010/03/24/bill_gates_and_terrapower/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/31/nuclear_no_panacea_ai/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aHh1VVI7Bo5EYI59Chr7lgAAAZU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/12/push_for_nuclear/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/07/trailer_sized_microreactors/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/03/us_gov_nuclear_energy/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/16/google_westinghouse_ai_nuclear/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/11/terrapower_nuclear_plant/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/18/nvidia_ai_smr_investment/
[13] https://www.terrapower.com/terrapower-and-sabey-data-centers-agreement-for-natrium-wide-scale-deployment
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aHh1VVI7Bo5EYI59Chr7lgAAAZU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/advanced/who-were-working-with/pre-application-activities/mcfr.html
[16] https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/advanced/who-were-working-with/pre-application-activities/natrium.html
[17] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aHh1VVI7Bo5EYI59Chr7lgAAAZU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Move fast ...
TFA is about doing neither of those things.
Re: Move fast ...
Were you born without a sense of humor, or did you lose it in a tragic accident?
Innovative reactors have this awkward problem where all the established designs are from a time when the amount of pre-construction analysis was limited, so they breezed through to test plants. The lessons of that time were written in fallout but the upshot is that we're stuck refining designs that were limited in core concept by the technology of their day.
Travelling wave reactors weren't really practical with the limited material science understanding and computer simulations of the 50s and 60s. While they do massively reduce the hazardous, messy reprocessing compared to traditional breeders, they never really got their shot at a live demo because of the era in which they became feasible.
Move fast ...
... and nuke things.