News: 1752671713

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Google's Android boss suggests ChromeOS could be on borrowed time

(2025/07/16)


Google's Android president has confirmed the platform is set to replace ChromeOS – but not when.

The ostensible reason is, we suspect, to offer better integration with Android handsets and smartwatches and so on, to rival Apple levels of interop.

[1]Sameer Samat is Mountain View's "President, Android Ecosystem," so presumably he knows. [2]TechRadar's interview is otherwise a little scant on detail, but it may not be all that long before the change happens. [3]This year's Google IO conference was, you may not be surprised to find, full of hype about AI, but the ChromeOS community on Reddit [4]noticed there was almost no mention of the Chromebook operating system.

[5]

As we [6]observed in 2023 , ChromeOS is a successful platform, outselling Macs, and The Reg FOSS desk agrees with our own SJVN's 2022 take: [7]ChromeOS is a Linux desktop . PC sales are doing fairly well, thanks in part to the [8]looming "End of 10," and analyst CMI [9]reckons sales are growing. Last year, [10]Google still recommended it as a lifeline for Windows 10 users.

[11]

[12]

Under the open source [13]Aura shell , ChromeOS is considerably more like a standard Linux distro than Android. It uses glibc and Canonical's upstart init system, and while the 2009 prototype was based on Ubuntu, it [14]switched to a Gentoo basis in 2010. On branded ChromeOS hardware, it can run Android apps installed from the Play Store. ChromeOS Flex, which runs on ordinary PC and Intel Mac hardware, doesn't have that – but both editions have the [15]Crostini Linux environment built in, which [16]uses Canonical's LXD to let you install and run Debian apps inside transparent VMs.

Android differs significantly as an OS. It still runs on a Linux kernel, but uses the [17]Bionic libc , which is BSD-licensed and based on BSD code rather than Linux. It's still a Linux, though, and it's open source via the [18]official Google AOSP .

[19]

There have been desktop PC versions of Android for years. Some, such as [20]Android-x86 and [21]BlissOS-x86 , are still maintained. There are others, such as Indian budget laptop vendor Primebook's [22]PrimeOS . Some have gone dormant, for example Jide's [23]Remix OS , which [24]The Register tried in 2016 , but the [25]company changed direction .

[26]GParted: Still the best free partitioner standing – unless you're on a 32-bit box

[27]The price of software freedom is eternal politics

[28]British Perl guru Matt Trout dead at 42

[29]Red Hat sweetens the RHEL deal for biz devs – just don't put it in prod

It's certainly doable. And improved integration with Android handsets and smartwatches might interest some users... as well as Google.

The big problem is driver support. ChromeOS Flex shows that this is surmountable, although there are still issues, such as Nvidia GPU support ( [30]third-party efforts do exist). The Linux app infrastructure is in a VM anyway, and [31]there's already an Android equivalent . We reckon this might happen sooner rather than later – and that the visible differences could be minimal. Assuming there's a Flex equivalent, even if maybe not at first, this could mean more app choice too. ®

Get our [32]Tech Resources



[1] https://blog.google/authors/sameer-samat/

[2] https://www.techradar.com/phones/android/i-think-you-see-the-future-first-on-android-googles-android-leader-sameer-samat

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/20/google_high_on_ai_flogs/

[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/chromeos/comments/1ku68p9/chromeos_surprisingly_low_profile_at_google_io/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aHfMlVkAoQH__6pcg6qcbQAAAg4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/18/linux_desktop_debate/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/28/column/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/15/end_of_10_campaign/

[9] https://www.custommarketinsights.com/report/chromebook-market/#table-of-contents

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/15/worried_about_windows_10s_impending/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aHfMlVkAoQH__6pcg6qcbQAAAg4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aHfMlVkAoQH__6pcg6qcbQAAAg4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[13] https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/aura/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/14/chromeos_opinion_column/

[15] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-library/guides/containers/crostini-developer-guide/

[16] https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-library/guides/containers/containers-and-vms/

[17] https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/

[18] https://source.android.com/

[19] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aHfMlVkAoQH__6pcg6qcbQAAAg4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[20] https://www.android-x86.org/

[21] https://sourceforge.net/projects/blissos-x86/

[22] https://www.primebook.in/primeos

[23] https://web.archive.org/web/20170718142245/http://www.jide.com/remixos

[24] https://www.theregister.com/2016/03/16/remix_os_deep_dive/

[25] https://www.theregister.com/2017/07/18/apocalypose_postponed_jide_withdraws_remix_os_from_consumer_frontline/

[26] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/14/gparted_live_1708/

[27] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/12/the_price_of_software_freedom/

[28] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/11/matt_trout_dies_at_42/

[29] https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/10/rhel_business_developers/

[30] https://github.com/sebanc/brunch

[31] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/13/android_15_linux_debian_terminal/

[32] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



What ever happened to Fuschia?

Ropewash

Wasn't that supposed to become Google's grand-unifying OS or something? I'd completely forgotten about it until this article.

Re: What ever happened to Fuschia?

Liam Proven

Still around.

https://opensource.google/projects/fuchsia

Last new release was in April, version 26 apparently.

Used in the Google Nest hub and not much else, so far...

Google's been cutting back on most of its interesting R&D in recent years, though.

Re: What ever happened to Fuschia?

DarkwavePunk

Yeah, apparently it's pretty close to joining the Google Graveyard...

Re: What ever happened to Fuschia?

elsergiovolador

"Google Nest"

Thanks for triggering my PTSD.

Re: What ever happened to Fuschia?

Anonymous Coward

Could be worse. You could have broken out in Hives

Can confirm

Anonymous Coward

I have a friend at the Chocolate Factory who transferred out of the ChromeOS division for just this reason. It's looking like Google senior management doesn't see a reason for two OS platforms, and phones are sexier than low end laptops and PCs, so advantage Android.

Re: Android

Mage

ChromeOS is only an integrated desktop that's inflexible and implemented by the ChromeOS browser. Android apps seem to run on an emulator in a VM!

There are almost no real ChromeOS apps other than the handful that Google provides that are poor compared to Mac/Windows/Linux and while they work off line, they are integrated to Google's servers (Cloud).

ChromeOS much better than it was, and maybe a Chromebook makes more sense than MS Surface for many, but depending on the HW spec Linux or Android natively is better. Only some actual Chromebooks can be really changed to Linux and none to Android. So don't by a Chromebook for Linux and don't buy one unless you have to (School etc for the handful of ChromeOS apps).

There is even less point to ChromeOS Flex which is the ChromeOS for not-Chromebook-hardware.

I'm torn

DarkwavePunk

I kind of want this to happen, but the Linux support must be as good. The VM approach they share is on the surface good. It's Google though so I'm sure they'll fuck something up and sell my data while they're at it.

Re: The VM approach

Mage

The VM approach sounds good till you try to use extra storage, run a program that has an Admin option (like Caja), add a USB device or run something not compatible with the Wayland that maps to Chrome and other stuff.

One ChromeOS icon has all the Linux Icons and many don't work because of the non-standard way Google implements it.

Or a backup. No Linux backup works. You have to use a broken Google backup to backup the Linux container that hides progress and lets you shut down (which kills the the backup). No backup or restore otherwise.

It's abysmal compared to Oracle Vbox on Windows for Linux, or Vbox on Linux for Windows (I have XP, Win7 and Win10 vms that are cloned from real old computers).

Blackjack

This Is just CEO talk for dumb Investors, the best they can do is make a version of ChromeOs that runs androids Apps and has a different name. They can't both cost cut to raise stock and make something completely new.

If Android for tablets keeps failing making an Android for laptops would fail too, so why not put ChromeOs under a new name and also make it able to run Android Apps?

Maybe name it Google Os cause Google is their most popular brand name or something?

Should ChromeOS count as a Linux?

Mage

Yes, it runs on Gentoo. But you can't install any Linux programs directly or easily access the underlying Gentoo.

Yes, as a way of of combing mobile, touch, tablet, laptop, mouse and keyboard it seems better than MS Surface

MORE GOATS

BUT

BUT

The desktop is inflexible and appears to be provided by the Chrome Browser.

The Android applications seem to run on an emulator with poor compatibility and many in Playstore blocked.

Linux applications run in a Container on a VM and are crippled by the security modem (some won't run), Wayland and 9P filesystem for any mounted storage, no matter if that is NTFS, ext4, or FAT32.

The Wayland seems to map to Chrome Browser.

Settings are a mix of Chrome Browser and ChromeOS settings.

There is no sane local backup for ChromeOS Apps (hardly any), Android apps and the user Linux subsystem in a contrainer. The actual ChromeOS backup and restore is only the OS firmware and resets the Chromebook like new.

The use of USB devices completely hit & miss on Linux and no Mass Storage device worked properly as they are only via 9P file mount and ChromeOS, yet direct USB-MTP access works.

The fact that it uses Gentoo Linux is irrelevant and hidden from the user, just as much as the Linux Kernel variation Android runs on.

Crippled Keyboard layout and driver.

No Compose / ibus etc in Linux.

I found no worthwhile ChromeOS apps. Other browsers allegedly for ChromeOS seemed to be Android Apps, so any browser program installed on Linux in the Container works better.

ALTERNATIVE

If you have a a suitable X86-64 version where security can be bypassed the BIOS can be sufficiently re-written to run Linux Mint (or any Linux distro) with any Linux desktop. Then battery life is longer, Linux programs all work and are faster, and you can still install an Android Emulator, which allows more Playstore apps than ChromeOS.

I thought that an ARM model might be good if you didn't need any x86-64 stuff and be better battery life. However I wanted x86-64 Linux and WINE for 32 bit Windows VB6 programs. I did get LO Writer, The GIMP, Calibre, Okular and WINE32 working. Caja partially working. SMB sort of direct rather than via ChromeOS. But all crippled due any extra storage being via 9P, wayland & Security model issues etc. Possible to add more containers, but not enough storage for more than one on any ChromeBook.

The keyboard is still poor as there are not enough keys on a ChromeBook. F11 & F12 missing and F1-F10 only work reliably as alternatives to the media keys. However the extra 512G microSD card formated as ext4 works fine with the Linux programs.

Switch off Sleep on close lid, or else if you close the lid too soon after shutdown, it only seems shutdown, but is in sleep and runs the battery flat.

Only get the ARM Chromebook if you want the ChromeOS google apps that work on Google's servers and offline, otherwise a big Android tablet with keyboard, or a laptop/tablet running Linux is better.

I think it's better than MS Surface with Win10 or Win11, but still poor compared to Android or Linux.

Substantial risk of electric shock.