Senate decides free rein for AI companies isn't such a good thing
- Reference: 1751394135
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/07/01/senate_passes_trumps_big_beastly/
- Source link:
Lawmakers were [1]definitive in their vote, with 99 voting to strip the state AI amendment and just a single Senator - Thom Tillis (R-NC) - voting to keep the moratorium in place. Even Ted Cruz (R-TX), who had wrangled last-minute concessions out of Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) that would have seen her support the state restriction, abandoned his position when Blackburn backed out.
The rule was part of the House-passed version of Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" budget reconciliation [2]act , and would have prevented US states from making [3]any state-level laws governing AI systems, with a few exceptions. The moratorium was originally designed to last for a decade.
[4]
Blackburn, whose home state of Tennessee is the hub of the US country music world, has faced pressure from Nashville to allow states to regulate AI, which creatives view as a threat to their livelihood. She struck a [5]deal with Cruz over the weekend to support the state-level AI moratorium, but only if it was shortened to five years, and with exceptions for child safety and privacy rules.
[6]
[7]
Their agreement had evaporated by Monday, with Blackburn [8]reportedly abandoning the compromise and demanding a formal roll call vote on the proposal, forcing each Senator to go on record supporting or opposing the state-level AI ban - a political event so dangerous even Ted Cruz wouldn't [9]hop a jet to avoid the consequences.
[10]Doing business in US? Don't wait for state ruling on AI to act, warns former Senate chief of staff
[11]As AI gallops through the federal workforce, lawmakers once again call for expanded training
[12]AI firms and civil society groups plead for passage of federal AI law ASAP
[13]Prepare for an AI policy upending under Trump, say experts
With that matter struck from the bill with such a definitive vote, it's unlikely it'll show back up in the final bill - but it still could.
Now that the Senate has passed its 940-page version of the bill, the matter goes back to the House for another round of voting. Both chambers will need to agree on a final version of the bill and pass that one along to President Trump to sign into law.
Trump wants this all to happen by Friday so he can sign the bill before Congress goes on recess for the July 4th holiday, giving the House precious little time to wrangle over this one point.
[14]
So the US will likely continue to have some degree of AI regulation, albeit fractured across 50 states. That's better than the federal government's current record of no comprehensive AI legislation. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00363.htm
[2] https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/20/trump_bill_regulation_free_ai/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aGRac2otu-XtfvA9axdDbwAAA40&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/06/29/congress/blackburn-cruz-find-potential-truce-on-state-ai-moratorium-child-safety-00432296
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aGRac2otu-XtfvA9axdDbwAAA40&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aGRac2otu-XtfvA9axdDbwAAA40&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-01/senate-removes-tax-bill-provision-limiting-state-ai-regulation
[9] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/18/us/politics/ted-cruz-storm-cancun.html
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/13/nist_framework_for_ai_presents/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/09/bill_federal_employees_ai_training/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/ai_firms_and_civil_society/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/21/ai_policy_trump/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aGRac2otu-XtfvA9axdDbwAAA40&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
He only wanted his digital twin to play without restraint
Think about it:
- unable to retain a consistent line of thought
- prone to stating utter nonsense with absolute confidence
- goes off the rails when simple numerical calculations are called for
- makes money by selling empty promises that digital goods have real value
Big Orange or LLM, you can't tell the difference. And clearly neither one should be hindered by laws or regulations, it just wouldn't be fair.
Oh dear
Seems that the AI lobby is going to have to prepare a lot more brown envelopes - and quickly.
Poor things. They might actually be prevented from scraping private data with impunity any where they want.
Sorry, but with the heat, my tears evaporate immediately.