News: 1750660352

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Huawei chair says the future of comms is fiber-to-the-room, which China has and the rest of us don’t

(2025/06/23)


Huawei’s chairman Xu Zhijun – aka Eric Xu – has called out China’s enormous lead in fiber-to-the-room (FTTR) installations.

Speaking at last week’s Mobile World Congress event in Shanghai, Xu shared his views on the telecommunications industry’s future growth opportunities and said by the end of 2025 China will be home to 75 million FTTR installations – but just 500,000 exist outside the Middle Kingdom.

Xu said FTTR will benefit businesses by increasing their internet connection speeds, helping them address spotty Wi-Fi coverage, allowing them to deploy tech in more places, and therefore creating more opportunities to adopt productivity-boosting devices and services. FTTR will also help carriers to sell more expensive packages, he said.

[1]

Huawei’s chair also wants carriers to think about delivery riders and influencers.

[2]

[3]

Xu said delivery riders matter because by the year 2030 five percent of the working population – or 160 million people – will be employed in the field. In China, delivery riders call the recipient of every consignment and that means they spend 800 minutes a month making voice calls – four times the average. The chair also observed that delivery riders kill time between gigs watching short videos on their mobile devices and therefore consume twice as much data as average users. They pay for the privilege and deliver 1.6 times the average revenue per user.

Huawei’s chair spotted another lucrative market for carriers to target, namely the 130 million people he thinks will conduct “livestreams” – infomercials hosted by influencers – because their data usage is five times higher than the average and they generate four times more revenue for carriers than regular users.

[4]

Xu thinks catering to livestreamers and delivery riders - and other emerging classes of users, including those who adopt new classes of device like smart glasses -is the way for carriers to grow.

[5]Huawei founder says USA overestimates its semiconductor prowess

[6]Taiwan thumbs its nose at Beijing by blocking chip exports to SMIC and Huawei

[7]TSMC blew whistle on suspected verboten exports to Huawei – that may cost it $1B+

[8]Eight charged with corruption, money laundering, in case linked to Huawei lobbying

He also wants China’s mobile carriers and web platform operators to work together to get more high-resolution videos onto mobile networks so both can profit from higher user engagement. The chair also called on networking equipment vendors to make their kit cheaper to operate, and for device makers to improve power consumption so users can stream more video more often.

The chair also wants every car to connect over 5G.

Xu said Huawei is here to help carriers deliver any of the scenarios he mentioned. And of course it is, because the Chinese giant has a thriving business selling to telcos – or at least to telcos beyond the liberal democracies that have largely decided Huawei’s close ties with Beijing mean the company and its products represent an unacceptable threat to the operation of critical infrastructure.

Huawei's board chairs occasionally make big speeches of this sort, because the company appoints a pool of three deputies who each spend three months in the top job before standing down. Xu started his more recent stint in the job on April 1st, 2025. ®

Get our [9]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aFkltl6-MsYpXT5Ifr0hNgAAAYY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aFkltl6-MsYpXT5Ifr0hNgAAAYY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aFkltl6-MsYpXT5Ifr0hNgAAAYY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aFkltl6-MsYpXT5Ifr0hNgAAAYY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/10/huawei_founder_interview_semiconductor_sophistication/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/17/taiwans_crack_down_on_exports/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/08/tsmc_blew_whistle_on_chinese/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/08/belgium_arrests_huawei_raid_links/

[9] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



FTTR? Really?

Joe W

Well... really? I mean, how much data do you need to be shovelled back and forth between the local macine and whatever? Unless you are back to terminals or XTerms or whatever, dumb machines that run everything, graphics included, over a network connection. Even then, 1 Gbaud or even 10 Gbaud can be run over copper, and the machine you are connectiong to is in a server room anyway, and this should be plenty good, right? I mean, giving each desk those network speeds and using them, what do you use in the server room? How do you satisfy the top data transfer needs of 24 or 48 users on the same switch?

But a telecom gear company will wnat to push that idea, so... yeah.

Re: FTTR? Really?

Probie

Agree, really dumb overkill.

I can only see one reason, very large access layer 480 port switches, just because fiber does not suffer the distance penalty copper does, and its thinner so a smaller trunk bunch next to the lift!!. This just simplifies the access layer, but the power draw would be horrendous, and we have a system that works fine now.

Re: FTTR? Really?

MatthewSt

I may be wrong, but for the kind of bandwidth we're talking about I was under the impression that fibre power usage was less than ethernet

Re: FTTR? Really?

mIVQU#~(p,

The more bandwidth the better, really.

Re: FTTR? Really?

david 12

Small flats in large residential towers -- the 21st Century 'normal' for Chinese cities. You have FTTR because there is only one 'room' to put it in. You don't install on the outside wall 15 floors up, and the garage, if there is one, is 15 floors down. You just fibre-wire the apartment building.

Re: FTTR? Really?

tiggity

Unless your copper is dodgy but BT / Openreach will not do anything about it (has to be absolutely dire before they do something).

(My guess is there's a sheathing issue or iffy junction somewhere as connection invariably acts up after we have had a lot of rain and ground is quite moist)

.. and out in the sticks fibre, of any sort, is a distant dream!

Going beyond 10Gb/s requires fiber for now

kmorwath

Cat 8 cables have their own issues - like the need of proper grounding - and anyway at higher speed have short ranges - meaning they are good for the switch-device connection only.

The question is when people really need 25+ Gb/s links in each room in the foreseable future- especially if all you get are influencers informercials created with AIs.... wathing them at 1024k doesn't look a smart idea, but probably that will be what they will sell.

Re: Going beyond 10Gb/s requires fiber for now

Anonymous Coward

Every time I see something that mentions influencers, I wonder if someone has someone started up a youtube channel called "Why don't you stop watching streams on your phone and go and do something less boring instead?"

Don't look at me, I'm not going to do it. I'm off to the shops now to look for an electric monk to believe insane rubbish on the internet so I don't have to.

Re: Going beyond 10Gb/s requires fiber for now

Anonymous Coward

I'm off to the shops now to look for an electric monk to believe insane rubbish on the internet so I don't have to.

Save your money, you have most of US population to believe insane rubbish on the internet and more nonsense besides.

They manage to breed more than enough defective replacements for those who's beliefs and plain stupidity remove from the gene pool.

Indeed their supreme court, their federal and many state legislatures have criminalised any attempt to limit this gullibility breeding program. Idiots` R `US?

I am pretty sure Douglas Adams' Electric Monk would have baulked if he were expected to believe the current fœtid mountains of crap; likely suffering a blinding conversion becoming a complete nihilist.

Re: Going beyond 10Gb/s requires fiber for now

Yorick Hunt

"The question is when people really need 25+ Gb/s links in each room in the foreseable future"

It's about building a future-proof infrastructure when the opportunity presents itself, rather than wasting time and money on re-building everything every few years.

Look at how much money NBNCo has wasted re-building the network in Australia because HRH King Rupert decreed once upon a time that "FTTN is more than good enough."

Do it once, do it properly.

BTW, I'm pretty sure that "room" was mistranslated from "abode" - as in, a fibre link to each flat (apartment) in a block, not a link to each room therein.

Eric Xu's 2030 vision...

Anonymous Coward

of Hell.

A world of Uberserfs (delivery drivers) and "influencers."

The rest living existing in tiny ticky-tacky boxes with 1000 Gb/s connectivity presumably plugged into this digital Nirvana via some AliExpress neuralink knock offs.

I could imagine in a total surveillance state it might desirable to have fiber circuit switched networking back the local Stasi office before the traffic is disseminated over a packet switched backbone or potentially even a circuit switched backbone.

I supposed having an almost exclusively fiber network with hardened switches might be a sensible precautions if you were anticipating a Carrington Event or the use of EMP weapons.

Re: Eric Xu's 2030 vision...

abend0c4

Apparently there is a [1]sudden UK boom in the production of "vertical drama" - one-minute video episodes of tacky fiction shot cheaply in portrait format for consumption on mobile phones in China. Another brick in the dystopian wall.

Another reminder that evolution is about survival at any cost, not about improvement.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/jun/22/a-new-space-to-play-in-can-vertical-dramas-save-the-uks-tv-sector

anonymous boring coward

I have FTT-house. Guess I'm missing out with only Gigabit Ethernet once inside?

I feel my productivity would be vastly improved with FTTR, and wifi won't be an issue. I guess I'll forego the benefits of wireless, and just have a FTT-laptop?

A bright new future, indeed!

PoE

Flak

The problem with Fibre to the room infrastructure is that you then need an NTE that converts optical to electrical - and this needs power. And/or a wireless access point, which also needs power.

I have seen fibre to the room installations in the UK that also deliver TV signal (Sky and/or Freeview). All of the sudden you have three devices requiring power and a not very elegant in-room delivery.

PoE with 10Gbps delivery to a room should be sufficient in all but the most demanding deployments for a long time to come.

Realistic question - what equipment / application would be able to use this at line rate and what is the actual Internet feed to a building aggregating all of those connections? I suspect that most will top out at 10Gbps anyway.

linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste
(ksh@cis.ufl.edu put this on T-shirts in '93)