News: 1748525592

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

US to deny visas to foreign officials it says 'censor' social media

(2025/05/29)


The US government says it'll refuse visas to foreign officials judged to have censored social media posts of American citizens - a move aimed at countries trying to stem the flow of online misinformation.

Virkkunen claimed US sites often block material that is not censored in Europe, such as discussions about euthanasia, and images of statues and other nude artworks

In an [1]announcement by the Department of State, secretary Marco Rubio said free speech is among the most cherished rights enjoyed by Americans, and complained that governments have taken "flagrant censorship actions" against some US tech companies, citizens and residents, when they had no authority to do so.

"Today, I am announcing a new visa restriction policy that will apply to foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on US citizens or US residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on US soil," Rubio said.

"It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States," he added.

Does UK's Online Safety Act cover misinformation? Well, that depends [2]READ MORE

The announcement did not specify any individual incident or point the finger at any particular nation, but there was much controversy in the UK last year when social media sites were accused of [3]spreading misinformation in relation to a fatal stabbing in the town of Southport.

It was [4]reported that MPs in Britain's Parliament were to summon X owner Elon Musk to testify about his platform's role in the riots, as part of an investigation into whether the business models of big tech companies "encourage the spread of content that can mislead and harm".

However, X has also had run-ins with the EU, becoming the first online platform to have [5]Digital Services Act (DSA) proceedings launched against it over a year ago. The European Commission (EC) accused the site of disseminating illegal content, among other violations of the Act.

[6]

At the heart of the issue is that US social media firms say legislation such as the [7]DSA amounts to censorship of their platforms. However, while these are US-based operations, their content is viewed by millions of people in regions like the EU and UK, where some of that content may fall foul of local laws.

[8]

[9]

In response to criticism of the DSA, the EC Commissioner for Technological Sovereignty, Security and Democracy Henna Virkkunen said that far more content is removed by American social media sites themselves using their own rules.

"Often in the US, platforms have more strict rules with content," she said in an [10]interview with European news website Euractiv .

[11]

She cited figures showing that 99 percent of online content removal cases between September 2023 and April 2024 related to content that was taken down from online platforms such as Meta and X, under their own T&Cs.

[12]Elon Musk's xAI pays $300M to born-in-Russia messaging app Telegram to push Grok

[13]Don't click on that Facebook ad for a text-to-AI-video tool

[14]America’s consumer watchdog drops leash on proposed data broker crackdown

[15]SSNs and more on 5.5M+ patients feared stolen from Yale Health

Virkkunen claimed US sites often block material that is not censored in Europe, such as discussions about euthanasia, and images of statues and other nude artworks.

It should perhaps also be pointed out that the US itself passed legislation to protect its citizens from foreign-owned social media operations. The [16]Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act has so far been used to rule that China-owned TikTok must sell off the US side of its operations to buyers acceptable to Washington – although this has yet to happen. ®

Get our [17]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.state.gov/announcement-of-a-visa-restriction-policy-targeting-foreign-nationals-who-censor-americans/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/30/does_online_safety_act_cover/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/30/does_online_safety_act_cover/

[4] https://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/nov/20/mps-summon-elon-musk-x-role-uk-summer-riots

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/18/eu_x_investigation/

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aDiElWpvd-6awguK-FY45AAAAks&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/08/25/google_eu_dsa/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aDiElWpvd-6awguK-FY45AAAAks&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aDiElWpvd-6awguK-FY45AAAAks&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.euractiv.com/section/tech/news/exclusive-us-limits-free-speech-more-than-the-eu-says-tech-commissioner/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aDiElWpvd-6awguK-FY45AAAAks&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/28/telegram_takes_300m_xai_cash/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/27/fake_social_media_ads_ai_tool/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/16/cfpb_data_broker/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/24/yale_new_haven_health_breach/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/24/us_senate_passes_tiktok_sale_act/

[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Countries that censor social media, hmmm...

tekHedd

I don't think the Chinese government is going to like this very much. That's who this is aimed at, right?

Re: Countries that censor social media, hmmm...

kmorwath

No, it's aimed also at Europe because Meta, Google & C. don't like EU rules, and are trying hard to kiill them.

But two things Rubio should think about:

With the CLOUD Act, USA asserted the right to obtain data stored on foreing soil just because it is hosted by US companies - why should other country accept illegal contents made by US citizens and available in EU? And what about FISA allowing US to gather data on everybody who is not USAian? EU should block visas for all these people, and whoever sell services to them, Bezos included (tell him he cannot marry in Venice, and has to go to Las Vegas instead...)

Second: isn't Rubio from a stupid state where a teacher was fired for showing children Michelangelo's David? Werent' the Library of Congress people fired for making available books the Dear Leader and is minions don't like? And let's not talk about Harvard....

Now, who is the real censor?

If someone would post detailed instructions on how to kill Rubio, would he ask them to be removed, or in the name of free speech would ask them to stay available?

Krasnov

elsergiovolador

Oh, the irony. The US claims it’s defending “free speech” - but what it’s really defending is the right of American platforms to spread disinformation, including Russian propaganda, into Europe without consequences.

Europe isn’t trying to censor American citizens, it’s enforcing its own laws on content like terrorist material, election interference, and harmful disinfo. Meanwhile, the US bans TikTok over “foreign influence” but cries foul when Europe pushes back on Russian operations hiding behind US tech platforms.

Re: American platforms to spread disinformation

Anonymous Coward

Perhaps it is time to think about banning Fox from cable and satellite platforms. Then concentrate on X and Zuckworld. They are all deep in the MAGA slime.

Carry on boycotting Tesla folks. Eventually, they might get the message that since Trump 2.0, the USA is no longer 'No 1'.

More like No 999,999,999 out of 1,000,000,000. Tesla is one place above the USA.

beast666

The collapse of global liberalism’s intellectual paradigm – its delusions together with its associated technocratic structure of governance will be the downfall of the EU. Good.

Winning.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Adair

To be replaced by what?

Wang Cores

If you think people are smart enough to NOT want the dark ages, you are naive. Many people want someone to tell them what to do and have the power of life and death over them.

They're all convinced they'll be better off in the new order and not a peasant that gets his head lopped off when he gets too mouthy.

Frankly I hope they get their new order. When their children die five at a time and the baron can do their wives for them, they'll stay out of the way of real people getting ahead at least.

Anonymous Coward

Our wayward poster here would probably fail the following tests, if he ever did them:

- [1]The Third Wave (experiment)

- [2]Brown eye/blue eye experiment

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Wave_(experiment)

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Elliott

Time for a boycott

Steve Davies 3

of the Olympics and World Cup.

Especially as TACO is boasting about having everything now that 'he' has both events.

If anything, countries should make is clear that anyone is at risk of 'being disappeared' when going to the USA. It should become a pariah state much like Russia and N. Korea both of whom has leaders that TACO greatly admires.

Re: Time for a boycott

Anonymous Coward

Thanks for 'TACO' - learned something new :)

Downhill, fast

b0llchit

First they came after the ... and I said nothing because I did not belong to ....

Then they came after ... and I did nothing because I did not belong to ....

Now they are coming for me and there is nobody left to defend me.

Thanks but no thanks

Irongut

It's ok Mr Rubio, your country has been on my DO NOT FLY list for over a decade already. I do not travel to countries who fingerprint innocent visitors at the border like a facist police state.

Right now you're on my how do we remove this chunk of rock from the planet & blast it into the depths of space for the good of humanity list.

Re: Thanks but no thanks

Adair

The first part of your comment matches my own position, except that I have only ever been in 'transit'.

They can't seem to cope with the reality that not everyone wants to actually 'visit' 'The Land Of The Free'.

Re: Thanks but no thanks

Anonymous Coward

I've always called it The Land Of The Fee.

I also never bought into the whole Freedom BS, because they're rather selective with it. That I'm white and speak English (well, almost) does not mean I'm blind to the abuse meted out to those who are not. In my opinion, freedom begins with equal treatment, irrespective of gender, race and other metrics someone has zip personal control over.

Also, I seriously dislike bullies and especially the Orange Blob is that personified, with Tesla boy at a comfortable second place.

Re: Thanks but no thanks

smudge

It's ok Mr Rubio, your country has been on my DO NOT FLY list for over a decade already. I do not travel to countries who fingerprint innocent visitors at the border like a facist police state.

You know that the EU is soon going to do that for vistors from outside of the EU?

I have no idea where you are, but just in case you need to know...

Idiots

Rich 2

“It is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms [bla bla bla] that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States…”

Yep. Because the good ol’ US of A has NEVER tried to apply its laws and whims outside of its borders. No. Never. Not at all.

I’m afraid my opinion of successive American governments (and the brain-dead half of its population) diminishes every day. The current morons running the show are …well …

Alien Doctor 1.1

Ah yes, the same free speech that allows uarseofa-based students to protest for Palestinians and against israel. The same free speech that causes people harm when they criticise the bloated orange fuck-face, his friends, family and policies. The same free speech that the american dictator believes is only his right to use.

The sooner trump, vance, rubio et al die, the better.

As someone above mentioned, the us has been on my no fly list since bush was in office.

I may have already mentioned this

Will Godfrey

Years ago an American friend told me not to try to visit him there again. He said he knew my attitude to bullshit and didn't want to have to visit me in jail.

Re: I may have already mentioned this

anothercynic

I effectively told friends in the US that I would not visit again while the US government went for social media vetting and other options, and my friends understood.

Now, with the current ICE behaviour at ports of entry, the US is permanently off limits for me. If there *is* a requirement for me to attend a conference or something, I'll travel via Dublin, where TSA preclearance happens on Irish soil, and where you do not end up in some US 'detention facility' for two weeks because some twat with a chip on his shoulder didn't like the look of you... In Dublin you can simply turn around and say "thanks, bye." and abandon your trip safely.

Mike 137

" ... It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on US citizens or US residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on US soil " Rubio said.

"It's [1]OK for us to do this though."

[1] https://www.dcreport.org/2025/03/16/the-state-is-me/

Why are we still receiving these people?

Anonymous Coward

Given that they dump from a great height on everyone, who bother still inviting them? It's a waste of energy because even if you reach some sort of agreement with them they don't stick to it anyway.

As far as I can tell, the average dictator can be more trusted to stick to any agreement than any of the current US administration, they have squandered not just money but also the one resource that is not easily renewed: trust.

As for what they are actually planning, it appears they're trying to deliberately crash the economy so they can go shopping on the cheap (the idea is to force the Fed to cut rates, something it is presently unwilling to do). That also explains the dump & pump scam of on and off tariffs: it has already been shown that there's a spike in trading activity prior to announcements, so I guess that's how these people create liquidity in preparation for that goal..

Yes, it is all theory. I'm probably wrong, but I wouldn't put it past them.

Re: Why are we still receiving these people?

Rich 2

Theory or not it sounds perfectly plausible

I suspect you are, in fact, not wrong

Hire the morally handicapped.