AI skills shortage more than doubles for UK tech leaders
- Reference: 1747650970
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/05/19/ai_skills_shortage_more_than/
- Source link:
A survey by tech recruitment specialist Harvey Nash found that around half UK tech leaders (52 percent) say they are suffering an AI skills gap in the past year, compared with 20 percent who said the same the year before.
The survey took in responses from 2,015 technology/digital leaders globally — including 924 in the UK — which took place between December 2024 and March 2025.
[1]
Harvey Nash and its owner, Nash Squared, found the perceived AI skills shortage was the steepest, biggest jump in any technology skills shortfall recorded in more than a decade.
[2]
[3]
The recruiter said that in "the previous 16 years that Nash Squared/Harvey Nash has tracked technology skills shortages, the next biggest reported jump in the UK was a shortage in Big Data skills, with a jump of just 55 percent. Even with cyber skills, for which demand continues to grow, the increase in scarcity has been gradual – rising from 12 percent [of respondents saying they were short of that skill] in 2009 to 30 percent this year."
At the same time, the top echelons of IT management might be in for a pay boost if they have managed to get AI on the business agenda. Harvey Nash found more than half of UK tech leaders had a salary rise in the last year, but four in ten did not get one.
[4]
It also found tech leaders achieving a pay rise of 10 percent or more were more likely to have a large-scale implementation of AI and more likely to be increasing tech headcount compared to the rest of the pack. They were also more likely to have a CEO that is significantly more focused on technology-making versus saving money for the organization (77 percent compared to the 63 percent UK average.)
[5]IT pros are caught between an AI rock and an economic hard place
[6]Sci-fi author Neal Stephenson wants AIs fighting AIs so those most fit to live with us survive
[7]Anthropic’s law firm throws Claude under the bus over citation errors in court filing
[8]Plan to keep advanced chips from China with tracking tech gains support in Congress
Additionally, UK companies saw an increase in AI investment, coinciding with the skills deficiency in the field. Nearly nine out of 10 tech leaders said they were either piloting AI or investing in small or large-scale developments, up from 46 percent recorded last year, the [9]survey found.
Bev White, CEO of Nash Squared said: "As AI is so new, there is no 'playbook' here – it's about a mix of approaches including formal training where available, reskilling IT staff and staff outside of the traditional IT function to widen the pool, on-the-job experimentation, and knowledge sharing and transfer. This needs to coincide with the development of a new operating model where AI is stitched in. Quite simply, those organizations that rise most effectively to the AI challenge will be in the driving seat to succeed."
Although organizations may be investing in AI, and looking for skills to support those investments, it is unclear what the outcome may be. In January this year, [10]Gartner found that AI was driving IT investment, but that "moonshot projects" had seen a high failure rate.
A recent survey of [11]2,000 CEOs by IBM found many enterprises are struggling to get real value from generative AI projects, and 85 percent estimate it'll take two years or more to achieve a return on investment.
[12]
Big Blue's research also revealed that more than half the respondents said they're hiring for brand AI-based new roles that didn't exist twelve months ago, and over a third anticipate the wider workforce will need to be retrained or reskilled inside the next three years. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aCtVnmalzlvzusCQbeknogAAApc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aCtVnmalzlvzusCQbeknogAAApc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aCtVnmalzlvzusCQbeknogAAApc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aCtVnmalzlvzusCQbeknogAAApc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/05/between_the_ai_rock_and/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/16/neal_stephenson_ai_evolution/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/15/anthopics_law_firm_blames_claude_hallucinations/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/15/gpu_tracking_house/
[9] http://www.harveynash.co.uk/research-whitepapers/digital-leadership-report-2025
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/22/business_value_genai_elusive/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/06/ibm_ai_investments/
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/aiml&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aCtVnmalzlvzusCQbeknogAAApc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Cognitive dissonance here
This times a thousand.
Re: Cognitive dissonance here
But we want people with 10 years experience in ChatGPT programming...
Re: Cognitive dissonance here
Exactly. Employers still don’t realise how deep the hole is. A young person today can either take on crippling uni debt, spend their free time staying ahead of a tech treadmill, and shoulder all the pressure - or do a few months’ training and earn the same (or more) laying bricks, wiring houses, or driving vans.
Sounds a lot like the eternal HR wail of "new thing came out yesterday, we only want to hire people with 10yr experiece of new thing, why can't we find people?!?!?"
Why would they even want people skilled in AI, when the whole point is to fire people? They just need to fire them and the rest will have to take on the extra work and do it however they can, as always. If remaining employees have access to ChatGPT then the board can say their company is an AI company.
big reset needed
Dont worry,classrooms full of people that have memorized all the buzzwords are being produced daily. They will flood the industry and sit there doing nothing most of the day,slowly learning from mistakes.
Uk guys will continue to walk dogs and be oblivious to all the jobs they are missing out on.
Time to go back to aptitude tests for jobs for UK school leavers with good exam passes and character. Even someone with no techno bollox qualifications is probably better than a lot of people getting hired.
They can be put through a 12 week training program and due to their 'aptitude' be a functional employee.
Same for most jobs. Bin off the certification culture and bits of paper people wave in your face.
Re: big reset needed
I know so many people with lists of certs who are not good at the job
MCSE was the death of it for me many years ago
Hmmmm..
"We want magic pixies to 10x our business"...
Followed by
"Why is no-one available who knows how to find magic pixies?"
Who knew there could be a shortage of snake oil?
What skills?
I’m genuinely curious - what exactly are the skills needed to “do AI”?
Re: What skills?
100% bullshit and false promises
Re: What skills?
Usually exactly the type of skill needed to make "AI", that was sold to that specific CxO as a magic cure for all the problems of the company, work. Easy, right?
Try to differentiate between machine learning, generative AI, or maybe neuronal nets - and you are out for not being enough of a magician being able to work with unicorns and pixie dust :)
The current AI climate reminds me a bit about the time leading up to the dotcom crash: Companies were crazy to hire whoever could pass an interview claiming to be a "programmer" to build the next big dot.com thing, without being able to verify the claims of the "programmer" (and mostly not even interested in clarifying ...).
However, the dotcom boom was still - in a technical sense - more sane than the current AI boom.
On a more serious note:
Managing expectations, keeping customers and managers grounded, understanding the basics and knowing the limitations should get you going for any serious AI effort - and it will keep you from joining the pure hype ones.
Of course, the same survey in 2021 found that no "tech leaders" were having AI skills shortages.
Shortage
Another year, another breathless headline about a "skills shortage" - otherwise known as companies refusing to pay market rates for highly specialised work. There’s no actual lack of AI talent - just a shortage of mugs willing to spend years mastering complex systems only to be underpaid so some executive can afford a third holiday home or a new yacht.
The so-called "gap" only appears when employers filter out anyone who expects a decent salary, job security, or the ability to work on something that isn’t doomed to become next year’s "strategic pivot."
If they really wanted to attract skilled people, they’d stop demanding five years’ experience in tools that came out last Tuesday, and maybe stop treating AI engineers like disposable buzzword dispensers.
AI has generated a tsunami of BS.
They are desperate to hire people who can take the magic snake oil currently known as 'AI' and replace x% of the workforce with it.
They should go the full Monty and set up a unit to turn lead into gold whilst they are at it.
And if they manage to create purest green, Lord Percy style, they can bank serious cash from a government eco credits scam too.
Sensible people are doubling down on their internet security, using less, simpler tech, paying for competent staff, reducing non-essential expenditure and focusing upon their core markets to survive the global financial disaster on the horizon.
Avoid AI. If you use Windows, switch to LTSC.
Any reasonable requests there?
My kindergarden level stats rules me out of the data science. My conviction that AI is yet another bubble ripe for bursting makes that a big NOPE! (With a capital F.)
What else is in demand?
Cognitive dissonance here
Sorry, but given my experience of looking for a role, there are plenty of qualified folk around.
Oh, hang on. They want paying.
This is another employer-led whine about the fact that there aren't any shit hot candidates who will work for fuck all.