News: 1747338086

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Plan to keep advanced chips from China with tracking tech gains support in Congress

(2025/05/15)


Proposed legislation gaining steam in Congress this week would require high-end GPUs and AI chips to include location-tracking safeguards to ensure US-designed components don't end up in nations against Uncle Sam's wishes, with exporters on the hook for compliance.

On Thursday, a group of bipartisan legislators [1]introduced [PDF] the Chip Security Act in the House of Representatives, following a similar bill introduced in the Senate last week.

If passed, the proposed bill would require that, within 180 days of enactment, certain advanced chips and systems as defined by US export control codes be equipped with some kind of "location verification mechanism," which would help detect and report diversion or misuse after export.

[2]

Exporters would be responsible for reporting violations to the US Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) in the event chips are diverted, misused, or tampered with.

[3]

[4]

In other words, if (say) Nvidia accelerators were sold to Singapore and suddenly showed up in mainland China, or the tracking tech was somehow disabled, the GPU giant would need to flag it.

Proponents of the bill, including Congressman Bill Huizenga (R-MI) and Bill Foster (D-IL), [5]argue the measure is needed to stop high-end GPUs from being rerouted to the Middle Kingdom through smuggling networks and shell companies.

[6]

"With advanced AI chips being smuggled into China and posing a national security risk, Congress must act," Foster said in a canned statement.

"In order for the United States to maintain our technological advantage, we must employ safeguards to help ensure export controls are not being circumvented, allowing these advanced AI chips to fall into the hands of nefarious actors," Huizenga added.

The House bill comes a week after Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) [7]introduced a similar bill in the Senate.

[8]US tech titans rejoice in $600B Saudi shopping spree

[9]Trump ends Biden-era dream to cap US AI chip exports

[10]Tech titans: Wanna secure US AI leadership? Stop giving the world excuses to buy Chinese

[11]Nip chip smugglers by building trackers into GPUs, US Senator suggests

Neither bill specifies exactly how these tracking mechanisms would work, only that, within six months of enactment, the Commerce Secretary must require covered AI chips to include location verification capabilities using feasible and appropriate techniques. Longer-term security requirements would be evaluated over the following year.

AMD and Nvidia declined to comment on the proposed rules. Intel had not responded by the time of publication.

[12]

The House bill comes just days after the Trump administration [13]scrapped Biden-era diffusion rules, which sought to crack down on the smuggling of GPUs and other high-end chips into China and other nations of concern by capping exports of compute to most nations outside the US and a select few allies.

The White House has promised to introduce new export restrictions, but apart from a few vague promises to safeguard US national security, details remain razor thin. ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Chip%20Security%20Act.pdf

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_specialfeatures/aiinfrastructuremonth&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aCZj6GbFpHz7u5rqzY9lZQAAAEg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_specialfeatures/aiinfrastructuremonth&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aCZj6GbFpHz7u5rqzY9lZQAAAEg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_specialfeatures/aiinfrastructuremonth&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aCZj6GbFpHz7u5rqzY9lZQAAAEg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-huizenga-moolenaar-krishnamoorthi-introduce-bill-stop-smuggling

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_specialfeatures/aiinfrastructuremonth&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aCZj6GbFpHz7u5rqzY9lZQAAAEg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/09/senator_fights_chip_smuggling/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/14/saudi_spending_spree/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/13/trump_ai_exports/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/09/tech_titans_wanna_secure_us/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/09/senator_fights_chip_smuggling/

[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_specialfeatures/aiinfrastructuremonth&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aCZj6GbFpHz7u5rqzY9lZQAAAEg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2025/05/13/trump_ai_exports/

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Paul Crawford

So chips in a data centre with high L-band attenuation through reinforced concrete have GPS? Nope, not going to work...

Chips have to "phone home" so you can check IP address? Hmm, just have open Internet access routed via a VPN to ${Country_of_choice} then.

In related news pigs have been seen flying!

mark l 2

Another case of politicians proposing laws without seeking any technical guidance of how things actually work first. Just like the backdoors in E2E encryption only for the good guys they keep going on about.

They might as well just pass a law that says every GPU must come with a magic unicorn which can fly back to the US and report on its location for all the good the law will do if enacted.

kahara

I'm not an expert™, but this sort of restriction seems nearly impossible to implement in practice, in a watertight way. Also foreseeing that a half-baked "solution" could make working with the chips unnecessarily difficult (or even impractical, in worst case) for "legitimate" users.

The new El Clásico - Politicians v. Reality.

Tron

Restock the popcorn, everyone, as we sit back and watch the latest clusterf*ck crash and burn.

Re: The new El Clásico - Politicians v. Reality.

harmjschoonhoven

Wasn't the US the country where legislators proposed to make Pi=4 by law?

Re: The new El Clásico - Politicians v. Reality.

Anonymous Coward

"Pi=4"

It was Pi=3.2 and was an [1]Indiana House Bill that never became law .

In good American style, the bill neither was an attempt to improve the law or lives of the people of Indiana, nor give a "good" value of Pi. It was some kind of patent scam.

Rather, the bill was aimed at benefiting its author, who claimed to have patented a new method for "squaring the circle", which he proposed to let the state of Indiana use free of charge if they would pass his bill! Its opening statement is clear:

PS: I too remembered a different value and story. But this is the consensus of history sites.

[1] http://scienticity.net/wiki/Legislating_the_Value_of_Pi

Maybe MOSSAD will offer

Andy Non

to install something a little extra with every circuit board... if it detects it isn't in a legitimate location then... (Icon)

(No, I'm not being serious, though some MAGA types might relish the idea)

Be careful! Is it classified?