UK Ministry of Defence is spending less with US biz, and more with Europeans
- Reference: 1746873972
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/05/10/uk_ministry_of_defence_drops_us_spending/
- Source link:
[1]
The RAF took delivery of two new F-35B Lightning jets – flown in from Texas and built by Lockheed Martin – at its base in Marham, Norfolk this week. But research from Tussell says there is now a shift away from US-based firms when it comes to defense spending (click to enlarge) – Pic: Crown Copyright
Tussell [2]found that MOD expenditure with private contractors grew 31 percent between 2019 and 2024 - 5 percent in real terms. Between Q1 2019 and Q4 2024, £52.5 billion ($70 billion) was paid out to private sector contractors.
Approximately half of the spending by the MOD (and its ALB – Arms Length Bodies) was with firms headquartered in the UK, such as Rolls-Royce and BAE Systems. The lion's share of the rest went to US-based companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
However, from 2022, there was a notable shift in spending away from the US-based firms, while European suppliers have experienced growth. The share of French firms, for example, has increased from five percent to 12 percent over the last five years.
The effect of decisions and announcements by the current US administration, including [3]tariffs , has yet to show up in the figures. Therefore, the shift away from US-based defense contractors could become even more pronounced as the MOD considers its dependencies.
[4]
Tussell states: "The evidence paints a picture of a defense procurement landscape that is slowly - but surely - expanding."
[5]
[6]
In real terms, procurement spending grew by only 5 percent, but the researchers noted "a clear shift toward greater European involvement."
As a proportion of financial outlay, Facilities Management (FM) and Construction increased markedly over the last few years, something Tussell attributed mainly to the MOD's £1.6 billion ($2.12 billion) [7]Future Defence Infrastructure Services (FDIS) program, announced in 2021 and set to run for seven years.
[8]
Digital and Consultancy accounted for 14 percent of MOD spending in 2024.
Tussell also found that since 2022, the US Department of Defense has invoiced the MOD approximately £700 million ($930 million) for a combination of projects, including the F-35 Lightning program. The F-35 program has had somewhat of a chequered history over the years, with software problems causing headaches leading up to the [9]delivery of the first aircraft in the UK.
Video footage of an F-35B [10]falling off the end of a British aircraft carrier following a botched take-off was circulated online in 2021. The US Navy has [11]lost a pair of fighter jets from an aircraft carrier in the last few weeks.
[12]Software troubles delay F-35 fighter jet deliveries ... again
[13]US Air Force says AI-controlled F-16 fighter jet has been dogfighting with humans
[14]Wow, so they actually let AI fly an F-16 fighter jet
[15]British arms dealer BAE behind F-35 electronics first in line for US CHIPS funds
[16]Leaked footage shows British F-35B falling off HMS Queen Elizabeth and pilot's death-defying ejection
Earlier this year, rumors circulated that the F-35 jets featured a "kill switch" allowing the US to disable the aircraft remotely. While such a scenario is unlikely, the aircraft does rely on US software, access to which could be blocked.
Earlier this year, Portugal [17]dropped plans for procuring F-35 fighters, citing US political uncertainty.
[18]
The MOD will be considering its supply chain and where to spend its budget as UK authorities get to grips with a possible new world order ushered in by the current US administration. Public and private sector organizations alike are being forced to reconsider their dependencies on the US.
The recent trend of spending more with European-based companies than US-based firms could accelerate in future years, where workable alternatives to US solutions can be found. ®
Get our [19]Tech Resources
[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2025/05/09/new_f_35bs_raf_markham_b.jpg
[2] https://www.tussell.com/insights/defence-procurement-tracker
[3] https://search.theregister.com/?q=%22world+war+fee%22
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aB94HgsD13qlhmT_Qvm8TwAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aB94HgsD13qlhmT_Qvm8TwAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aB94HgsD13qlhmT_Qvm8TwAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/16-billion-investment-to-upgrade-uk-defence-estate
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aB94HgsD13qlhmT_Qvm8TwAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2016/06/30/first_f_35b_joint_strike_fighter_lands_uk/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/30/f35b_ejection_hms_queen_elizabeth_video/
[11] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/another-us-fighter-jet-falls-into-sea-truman-aircraft-carrier-us-officials-say-2025-05-07/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/24/software_delay_f35_fighter/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/18/darpa_f16_flight/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2023/02/14/ai_air_force_f16/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/11/bae_chips_funds_f35/
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/30/f35b_ejection_hms_queen_elizabeth_video/
[17] https://theaviationist.com/2025/03/13/portugal-f-35-plans/
[18] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aB94HgsD13qlhmT_Qvm8TwAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Protection comes with business
Of course fools don't learn, they mastered to blame someone else (always blame the messenger).
The GCAP is (currently) a British/Italian/Japanese project.
It will be the Eurofighter (Typhoon) replacement, some decades and a few zillion quid down the road.
The F35s will have a kill switch by default. The US will expect to retain control of the software and could simply update it 'over the air' like a Tesla. And then your F35 stops working. So no need a black box under the seat with 'Kill switch. Interfering with this invalidates your warranty' on it.
Re: The GCAP is (currently) a British/Italian/Japanese project.
> The F35s will have a kill switch by default.
If they don't already[1] then they will do soon.
As Trump explicitly [1]wants a day-one reduced-capability F47 for use by non-US forces, the only reason that he woudn't also be demanding total kill-switches in that - as well as any US hardware that actually exists, such as the F35 - would be if he hasn't thought about it[2].
[1] and not just by switching off the back-end server and convincing the aircraft that its software is so out of date that it has forgotten how to flap, but a straight-forwards quick'n'easy short "seppuku" message, which the F35B would be uniquely equipped to carry out.[3]
[2] hasn't had it whispered into the Imperial ear by the Vizier of Defense.
[3] of course, the Rolls-Royce LiftFan in there would never have a UK-controlled off-switch, that would just be unsporting.
[1] https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/u-s-to-reduce-capabilities-of-new-jet-purchased-by-allies/
Re: The GCAP is (currently) a British/Italian/Japanese project.
"Interfering with this invalidates your warranty' on it."
Unless you are pretty good at reverse engineering.
Sam
They better get going they are about to find out all that free medical care was paid for with the Army they didn't maintain
Re: Sam
So what's the excuse for the US if they manage to balance both? Beyond being lousy people?
Protection comes with business
Americans seem to see their military hegemony as just foreigners leeching off American taxpayers.
Now they start to experience the other side of protecting foreigners: Business, trade, and Investments.
Or more accurately, they see that withdrawal and threats lead to less business, trade, and deinvestments.
Trusts comes on foot but leaves on horseback.
It is a pity to have to see that Republican Fools will learn how easily they are parted from their money.
If Fools learn, that is.