UK's smaller broadband operators face tough road ahead, consolidation possible
- Reference: 1746185233
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/05/02/uk_small_broadband_operators/
- Source link:
So claims Neos Networks, which itself operates a fiber network spanning much of mainland UK. Its report says that almost all altnets are considering mergers or partnerships with other service providers, and looking to diversify their businesses to offer other services such as smart home technology or security packages.
Its [1]report is based on a survey of 100 senior decision-makers at UK-based altnet providers, commissioned in January 2025.
[2]
Typically much smaller firms than the big network operators like BT Openreach or Virgin Media O2 (VMO2), altnets have nevertheless been a "positive disruptive force," according to the report, attracting billions in investment to speed the rollout of fiber broadband across the country.
[3]
[4]
But with [5]incentives from the government , the incumbents have also doubled down on their own efforts to deploy fiber-to-the-premises (FTTP), according to Neos, which has put the squeeze on many smaller operators, which are now struggling to generate the revenue needed for longer-term sustainability.
Competition between the incumbents and newcomers has seen the UK become "a patchwork of network overbuild," the report states, with premises in some areas being able to choose between three or even four providers.
[6]
In these decisions, incumbents have the upper hand, Neos claims, with 34 percent of altnets suggesting brand awareness is the greatest challenge getting in the way of their goals.
Attacks on UK fiber networks mount: Operators beg govt to step in [7]FROM THE ARCHIVES
Over half of respondents (55 percent) said that customers being locked into an existing contract was a significant struggle for them, limiting their ability to generate subscribers where they've built their networks.
Many customers also have a bundle combining broadband with other services like TV and mobile, so switching to a broadband-only altnet provider seems like a step backwards, the report says, once again giving incumbents the upper hand.
Build costs have also been steadily rising as operators have continued expanding their footprints, while investors are increasingly using take-up as their key measure of return on investment, leading to a hesitancy to invest further. As a result, 46 percent of altnets say that it has become more challenging to access funding over the past year.
The main barriers to getting that funding, as ranked by respondents, are high interest rates, regulatory constraints, and strict lending criteria, but insufficient collateral and economic uncertainty were also cited.
Openreach overreach?
However, the regulatory concerns seem to refer mostly to a lack of sufficient regulatory intervention to counteract the "significant market power" of Openreach, the infrastructure arm of Britain's former state-owned telecoms monopoly, BT.
The report cites claims that Openreach has purposefully overbuilt in areas where a smaller operator has been awarded Project Gigabit contracts, in order to take advantage of the attention to pick up customers.
[8]
"Our altnet partners have been very clear about some of the structural challenges that deter competition and limit private investment in key regions," Neos Networks CEO Lee Myall stated.
"As an example, they've highlighted a tactic whereby Openreach announces FTTP expansion plans for specific areas without firm deployment timelines. This strategy discourages altnets and investors from committing to those areas, as they fear being undercut by Openreach's rollout at a later stage."
[9]Altnets told to stop digging and start stuffing fiber through abandoned pipes
[10]Openreach tests 50 Gbps broadband – don’t expect it anytime soon
[11]Progress towards 'Gigabit Europe' is slow, with UK also lagging
[12]BT fiber rollout passes 17 million homes, altnet challenge grows
Many of the smaller operators have also been critical of regulator Ofcom for allowing Openreach to introduce a [13]discount pricing scheme that incentivized internet service providers (ISPs) to choose its fiber network over others.
One thorny problem altnets face is Openreach shuttering local exchanges over the next decade, as it shuts off its copper network and moves to full fiber, Neos claims. Operators reliant on these locations face finding gaps left in their networks, and fixing these will cost them £1.4 million ($1.85 million), it says.
According to the report, 96 percent of the altnets surveyed reported they were currently considering a merger, either to boost customer numbers, expand the geographic reach of their services, or to combine technologies.
However, partnering with external providers carries certain risks, Neos warns. Many altnets built their reputation as customer-focused providers, and they will need partners with the same dedication, or find they have extended their reach but at the expense of their reputation. For this reason, you might expect altnets to partner closely with their peers, yet only 36 percent plan to partner with another, the survey finds.
This is because a fiber network requires a take-up rate of 35 percent to be commercially viable long-term, according to Neos. With the average altnet take-up at just 15 percent, the math simply doesn't add up for this strategy, it says.
One industry observer who has been forecasting consolidation in the UK broadband market for some time is the Founder and Telecoms Analyst at PP Foresight, Paolo Pescatore.
Commenting on the findings of the report, Pescatore said it is "unsurprising and the longer they leave it, the worse it will be. They're all holding out for a big day!"
He added it is a "huge opportunity for CityFibre to come in and cement its position and put even greater pressure on VMO2's NetCo."
In order to survive, most are looking to differentiate themselves beyond their customer service credentials by offering additional products and services.
Smart home technology was cited by 46 percent of respondents, with enterprise connectivity a potential target for 43 percent, security services listed by 42 percent and 5G Fixed Wireless Access by 39 percent as the most common offerings they are looking to implement in the future.
The decisions made now will define the future of UK connectivity, the report claims. It states that altnet providers that evolve, integrate and innovate will not only endure but help shape the next era of digital infrastructure.
With intensifying competition, financial pressures and evolving regulatory frameworks, it's clear that these smaller providers need to adapt swiftly to secure their long term position. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://neosnetworks.com/resources/blog/altnet-report-2025/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aBTsHkJ5ZU5Lj5W_81TiRAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aBTsHkJ5ZU5Lj5W_81TiRAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aBTsHkJ5ZU5Lj5W_81TiRAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/19/uk_project_gigabit/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aBTsHkJ5ZU5Lj5W_81TiRAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/12/uk_network_operators_want_government/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aBTsHkJ5ZU5Lj5W_81TiRAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/03/altnet_abandoned_pipes/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/06/openreach_tests_out_50gbps_broadband/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2023/10/24/progress_towards_gigabit_europe_report/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/31/bt_fiber_rollout_passes_17/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/24/uk_regulator_openreach_discount/
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
isn't this exactly what happened with the cable networks?
skipping streets
Well I WOULD have signed up with an altnet (gofibre) but they skipped my 1970s street because it was direct in ground cabling, despite putting poles elsewhere in town they took my street out of scope entirely and started talking about applying for grants etc which soured me on it.
Openretch announced my town back in 2020 and was "by December 2026" but now it's "build not planned" so seems their usual dirty tricks at play as usual.
Openretch are an archaic shower that long ago should have been broken up / made a non profit to stop BT pulling dirty tricks
Openwretch
They used to play tricks like deliberately not fixing LLU connections, or deliberately breaking other connections, to make BT look better. Or in one case I recall years ago, a customer's broadband wasn't working - it wasn't BT - and after literally months or it not being fixed properly, the engineer suggested going to BT. Lo and behold, BT got them broadband within 2 weeks.
Even now, Openwretch still can't keep their hands off plugging BT. When we (a reseller of various wholesale broadband services) get a broadband connection put in by Openreach, they occasionally ask the customer where the "BT Hub" is, or even in one case leave one behind. Then we have to tell the customer it's not BT.
But, as I always end up saying, this consolidation that's inevitably going to happen is just part of the Enshittification of Everything. At the moment, altnets can move fast, and aren't bogged down in as much bureaucracy as the likes of BT, Virgin etc. That just won't last. It'll become awful.
Smaller networks don't really help themselves
Take TOOB for example. Their headline rate looks good but if you want a fixed IP Address then is it a monthly charge of at least £5.00. Then, according to the droid who called at my home less than an hour after BT had moved me to Full Fibre without a hitch, I would have to take their router which has next to no port forwarding or firewall or.... PlusNet let me use my existing router and I get a 500mbit service.
That makes it almost identical to what I can get with PlusNet who charged me once for the fixed IP address.
Yes BT can be a right PITA. I know that from selling kit to them in the 1990's but at the moment, there is little that would get me to move to a different supplier.
Regulator more like collaborator
Ofcom much like most of the "of"s are so far up the industries "r"s are at best ineffectual at worse directly impacting on competition. Large Suppliers own them and smaller suppliers face a slow death.
Communication Networks, should be modelled on the energy sector, Openreach and VM02 networks should be merged in to one infrastructure supplier who charges ISP for access to network at a capped price by OFCOM who has more power for the consumer and not just protecting the industry. BT, VM should be split up in to regions and offered to smaller players give the a bigger footprint and offer better opportunities and alternatives.
We have a local company "Facto".
Not being an "early adopter" I decided to wait and see how good they were.
Their marketing is like an Indian call centre but with less honesty. The new system reliability is appalling with frequent drop-outs for 1-2 hours.
At one point they were emailing, texting and ringing my mobile and land line numbers several times a week to the point where I threatened them with the Information Commissioners' Office unless they ceased and desisted.
Meanwhile we're staying with out existing provider which, whilst not the fastest, is adequate for our use and reliable.
with other services like TV
Why would you do that?
Is there anything on TV that is worth paying for?
TV is owned by rich people who have agenda to ensure you will never become rich like them.