Microsoft pitches pay-to-patch reboot reduction subscription for Windows Server 2025
- Reference: 1745822221
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/04/28/windows_server_2025_hotpatching_subscription/
- Source link:
Hotpatching allows software updates to be applied without requiring a reboot. It’s a common approach that’s available for the Linux kernel, VMware products, and the Xen hypervisor. Admins like it because it allows security updates to be implemented without requiring reboots – and therefore without having to find a change window or convenient moment for an outage.
This feature will be a game changer; you may finally get to see your family on the weekends
Microsoft already offers hotpatching for Windows Server: Azure Edition and version 2022 running in its Azure cloud. The company says its Xbox team is a big user.
In August 2024 the Windows behemoth [1]announced a preview of the same functionality for Windows Server 2025 running in Azure.
A month later, the software giant [2]teased a preview of hotpatching for Windows Server 2025 implementations controlled by its Arc hybrid-and-multicloud management tool.
[3]
That preview meant hotpatching came to Windows Server 2025 Standard and Datacenter edition, and made it possible to use hotpatching on-prem.
[4]
[5]
“This feature will be a game changer; simpler change control, shorter patch windows, easier orchestration,” Microsoft’s general manager of Windows Server Hari Pulapaka wrote at the time, adding “and you may finally get to see your family on the weekends.”
Last Thursday Microsoft [6]announced the preview will end on June 30th – and be replaced by a subscription service that costs $1.50/core/month.
[7]
A post by Windows Server Product Marketing Manager Janine Patrick and Senior Program Manager Artem Pronichkin explained that the service aims to deliver eight hotpatches each year.
“It follows a three-month cycle with the first month as a baseline month (monthly cumulative update) followed by two months of hotpatches. During baseline months the machines will need a reboot,” the pair wrote, before explaining that the baseline months are January, April, July and October. They also advised “On rare occasions, for security reasons we may have to ship a non-hotpatch update during a hotpatch month which will also need a reboot. But the goal will be to provide up to eight hotpatches in a year.”
The pair argue hotpatching “can decrease the ‘window of vulnerability’ which can result if an administrator might normally delay an update and restart after a Windows security update is released” and also argue that “hotpatching can save significant time and ease the inconvenience of a traditional ‘patch Tuesday’.”
[8]Buckle up, admins – Windows Server 2025 officially hits GA
[9]Windows Server 2025 locking up after February patch, no word of when a fix will land
[10]Legal clock ticking for Microsoft over alleged software license abuses
[11]Exchange Server 2019 has less than six months of support left in the tank
Users will not be required to adopt hotpatching: Microsoft will continue to deliver software updates on its current schedule.
Redmond clearly thinks some Windows Server 2025 users will happily pay extra to avoid some downtime.
[12]
While Windows Server 2025 machines will need to be managed by Arc to use hotpatching, using Arc for this new offering won’t incur a cost.
Those who are testing the hotpatching preview will automatically be rolled onto subscriptions from July 1st. To avoid that, disenroll before June 30th.
Azure Editions of Windows Server will continue to get hotpatching at no cost.
Over to you, dear reader: Will you pay more for the promise of non-disruptive patches? The comments are down there. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windowsservernewsandbestpractices/hotpatching-is-now-available-in-preview-on-windows-server-2025-evaluation-vms-in/4203451
[2] https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/windowsservernewsandbestpractices/how-to-preview-azure-arc-connected-hotpatching-for-windows-server-2025/4246895
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aA9RyxBEf4flnwbBBugUYQAAAtQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aA9RyxBEf4flnwbBBugUYQAAAtQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aA9RyxBEf4flnwbBBugUYQAAAtQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/blog/2025/04/24/tired-of-all-the-restarts-get-hotpatching-for-windows-server/
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aA9RyxBEf4flnwbBBugUYQAAAtQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/04/windows_server_2025_ga/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/28/windoers_server_2025_freezing/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/07/legal_clock_ticking_for_microsoft/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/15/exchange_server_2019/
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aA9RyxBEf4flnwbBBugUYQAAAtQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Windows of vulnerability
Must... not... take... cheap... shot... Dammit!
I'm torn
On the one hand, I detest licenses and especially subscription services for common features that should be included by default.
But on the other hand, I think some sysadmins would gladly empty their own pockets for this!
I do wonder where the service part of subscription service comes in here. Why is this not included in the regular windows update service that comes with your subscription?
I guess because it uses Arc in the background, but does it really need to use Arc?
“and you may finally get to see your family on the weekends.”...
So you mean to say that your product is so bad and unstable that it needs constant supervision / patching ??
What could possibly go wrong
This should be “interesting”, the memes will be great
"Hotpatches are monthly Windows OS security updates that update in-memory processes"
If I were herding MS systems that definition from the MS preview announcement would be to a zoo keeper akin to the prospect of giving a cage full of hyperactive monkeys a box of double edged razor blades to play with.
At USD 1.5/core/month a now unremarkable 64 core beastie that's USD 96.0 pcm or USD 1152.0 annually for the privilege of having process memory corrupted by MS or any miscreant that manages to subvert hot patching supply chain. Hardly more attractive than having your throat cut by a beserk monkey.
"Aim for xxx hotpatches per year ... which may require a reboot"
To rewrite that statement:
We "aim to find and patch vulnerabilities or update software xxx times per year" and
We "require a subscription for you to have a hot patch service which may or may not actually be a hot patch ..."
This is MS "helping" customers apparently.
Customers already pay for this software and updates, this is just a change in update methodology. Is this the first step for MS supplying software updates as a subscription model?
Per core pricing has to stop.
extortionist b'stardo's
Hey sysadmin ....
How long can u keep bending over to keep "taxxxx xx xx xxx xss", before u say enuf is enuf
stop being lazy and start your planned slowmo migration and gradually get of the active directory coolaid!
get back some self respect and dignity and be a happy bunny again :)