News: 1745303467

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

It takes one click to join Uber One, but quitting might need 32 actions

(2025/04/22)


The USA’s Federal Trade Commission on Monday launched a lawsuit against Uber, alleging the rideshare giant ripped off customers by enrolling them in its “Uber One” membership scheme without permission, failing to deliver promised savings, and making it devilishly difficult to opt out.

A [1]complaint [PDF] filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California states: “Uber claims that consumers in an Uber One membership will save certain amounts off ride bookings or food deliveries compared to those without an Uber One membership, and that Uber One consumers can ‘cancel anytime’ without additional fees.”

The reality, the complaint argues, is that some people have reported being signed up for Uber One without opting in and then charged for the service, and that while it is possible to cancel a membership doing so requires “as many as 32 actions” spread across 23 screens of Uber’s app.

[2]

The complaint also alleges that Uber charges members of the scheme before the end of free trial periods, meaning some can’t quit before they are charged. Paid members who quit the scheme less than 48 hours before a payment is due are always charged for at least one more month because Uber “never processes cancellations concluded via the in-app cancellation flow in the final 48-hour window.” Some requests to cancel Uber One memberships see customers asked to contact customer service, but the complaint alleges Uber never responds to such requests in time to avoid a payment.

[3]

[4]

The regulator also alleges that Uber “obscures material information about the subscription (for example, by using small, greyed out text which consumers can easily miss)”

The logic of Uber’s claim that members will save “$25 every month” is also disputed, on grounds that it doesn’t take into account the $9.99 monthly fee.

[5]Mozilla slams Microsoft for using dark patterns to drive Windows users toward Edge

[6]EU officials say X’s paid-for blue check deceives users and breaks law

[7]Uncle Sam names three Amazon execs as Prime suspects in subscription ripoff case

[8]India warns ecommerce 'basket sneaks' and 'confirm shamers' their days are numbered

“Americans are tired of getting signed up for unwanted subscriptions that seem impossible to cancel,” said FTC Chairman Andrew N. Ferguson in a [9]canned statement that went on to say his agency “is fighting back on behalf of the American people.”

For what it’s worth, the Biden administration also targeted this sort of thing after [10]complaining that some companies “deliberately design their business processes to be time-consuming or otherwise burdensome for consumers … all with the goal of maximizing profits.”

[11]

Further, the FTC in 2023 called for companies “to make it as easy to cancel a subscription or service as it was to sign up for one.”

Uber is far from alone in confusing customers. Microsoft recently made its Copilot AI service opt-out, but [12]made it very hard to find the tools to do so. Epic Games [13]refunded some customers after they racked up purchases they didn’t understand. Amazon.com has also [14]felt the regulatory lash for practices that saw it cancel orders that customers thought were set to ship, and for placing the text explaining its policies “in gray font on a white background, at the very bottom of the page.” ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/uberonecomplaint.pdf

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aAdo04Ob-PiwZXnJL87FFgAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aAdo04Ob-PiwZXnJL87FFgAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aAdo04Ob-PiwZXnJL87FFgAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/02/mozilla_slams_microsoft_dark_patterns/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/12/eu_officials_say_xs_paidfor/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/21/ftc_amazon_prime_amended_complaint/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/09/08/india_dark_pattern_prohibition_draft/

[9] https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/04/ftc-takes-action-against-uber-deceptive-billing-cancellation-practices

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/13/biden_administration_time_is_money/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aAdo04Ob-PiwZXnJL87FFgAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/07/microsoft_365_price_rises/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2024/12/12/bilked_by_epic_games_check/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2024/03/29/amazon_poland_fine/

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



A company that tries to trick you

Anonymous Coward

Is not a company you should do business with.

Re: A company that tries to trick you

alain williams

In that case there are many companies that you will not do business with, unfortunately.

Pascal Monett

And why should that be a problem ?

Let them die, they deserve it.

Re: A company that tries to trick you

Alumoi

So no more Microsoft, Google, Apple, Wallmart, T-Mobile, Orange, Carrefour, Lidl, Ikea.....

Not just in the US

Anonymous Coward

I wanted to go into the Science Museum in London. It is a free entry (although when you get in your find that many exhibits require a fee.)

However, you have to 'buy' a free ticket by scanning a QR code at the entrance and then entering in a lot of information - name, address, email, etc.

The staff on the entrance cannot allow you access without this 'free' ticket.

Clear breach of civil liberties and unnecessary spying - I will be writing a snotty email to them and my MP later!

My wife, who is part of the "allow all cookies" brigade, despite all my protestations, filled in the forms for the whole family, so I did get to go in and in the "communications" hall, saw my life's work it the forefront of communications and computing displayed on the walls!

Anon, because I cried in that hall. Was it pride at being involved in so many of the exhibits or despair at being so 'technologically' old?

Re: Not just in the US

Anonymous Coward

entering in a lot of information - name, address, email, etc.

Yup! William Shakespeare † , Stratford on Avon, nemo@xor.com, playwright, 460 years,...

I have no qualms whatsover about my occasional delusional fugues in contexts like these. Deception works both ways, no?

I don't imagine the Bard himself is going to turn his grave every time someone misappropriates his identity.

† or Willy Wagglestaff.

Re: Not just in the US

longtimeReader

Similarly, I wanted to watch a game at the Oval last week. Ticket office asked for Name, address, postcode, email, date of birth.... When questioned about why, they said "it's the ground's policy". Questioned further: "we need DoB because there are some junior tickets available." I'd like to think I look young for my age, but rather clearly not under 18. Ended up giving them false info of course.

Sadly, very often is "cost of doing business"

IamAProton

If the fine is less than what a company earns with these shady tricks, why should they stop?

Start with 5X the estimated revenue and a note front and center in all their websites/apps and in every email sent from them for a couple of months, then maybe something will change

Anonymous Coward

Dating apps are experts at this. There was one which only allowed you to cancel your monthly subscription on a specific day of the month and it could only be done by calling a premium rate number.

Why 48 hours ?

Pascal Monett

" Uber “never processes cancellations concluded via the in-app cancellation flow in the final 48-hour window.” "

Hey Uber, why make your life difficult ? Just say that you never process cancellations in the final 12-month window and boom ! an extra year of extortion that is "perfectly justified".

You have computers, don't you ? They can process a cancellation in milliseconds.

Bunch of lying thieves is what you are.

So my conclusion is

Andy Non

never use Uber.

Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality.
-- Jules de Gaultier