News: 1744907232

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Small ocean swirls may have an outsized affect on climate, NASA satellite shows

(2025/04/17)


A NASA-led satellite mission has suggested that swirls and eddies in the middle of the ocean have a bigger influence on Earth's climate system than scientists previously realized.

Measuring changes in the Earth’s oceans has been a huge challenge for scientists owing to their vastness and inaccessibility. While satellite data has helped revolutionize modern oceanography, there are limits to the level of detail scientists can record.

To help address the problem, in December 2022 [1]NASA launched its Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite, which aims to measure the height of water in freshwater and ocean environments.

[2]

While previous satellites struggled to resolve ocean features smaller than 100 km, SWOT was designed to capture them in detail. Its Ka-band Radar Interferometer scans 120-km-wide swaths of sea surface height, delivering two-dimensional measurements with far greater resolution and lower noise than earlier altimeters. The satellite's 21-day orbit enables repeated global coverage — though with limited temporal resolution.

[3]

[4]

The paper [5]published in Nature today marks the first global view of submesoscale ocean dynamics from the SWOT satellite. These small-scale features - spanning just 1 to 100 kilometers - include eddies and internal waves whose dynamics and energy content had never been observed from a global perspective. Though small, scientists believe they influence the transport of heat, carbon, and nutrients between surface and interior layers.

SWOT ushers in a new era of global ocean observing, placing [small-scale] ocean dynamics as a critical element of the Earth's climate system

“These processes are crucial in regulating Earth’s climate, yet they have mostly been under the radar for oceanographers — almost literally,” said Elisa Carli, a research fellow in physical oceanography at the European Space Agency, in an accompanying [6]article .

“These findings confirm that SWOT will be able to quantify kinetic-energy fluxes precisely, down to scales of around 10 km — a giant step in understanding ocean dynamics,” Carli said.

The researchers, led by NASA Jet Propulsion Lab research scientist Matthew Archer, said that the new data from the SWOT satellite not only confirm the characteristics of small-scale ocean features “but also suggest that their potential impacts on ocean energetics, the marine ecosystem, atmospheric weather and Earth’s climate system are much larger than anticipated.

[7]

“SWOT ushers in a new era of global ocean observing, placing [small-scale] ocean dynamics as a critical element of the Earth’s climate system,” the paper said.

[8]US senator warns 'China is cheering' for proposed NASA budget cuts

[9]White House budget proposal could beam NASA science back decades

[10]Saturnian moon Mimas: Crunchy on the outside, sub-surface ocean on the inside

[11]Splash! Three times as much water as ALL of Earth's oceans found TRAPPED underground

However, Carli’s article points out that further work is needed to provide more detail, and calls for joint projects with other research teams.

“SWOT is a unique instrument that opens doors to explore unknown global and local ocean dynamics. The first results place [small-scale] ocean dynamics as a crucial element of Earth’s climate system. Exploiting all available data is a long process that will take years. But strong collaboration between the climate and data-science communities will lead to better understanding, prediction and protection of the ocean and of the whole climate system,” she said.

Observers of US politics of the last few months might fear for the prospect of such work. The Trump Administration is reportedly set to [12]slash NASA's science budget by nearly 50 percent, including [13]significant cuts to climate research.

NASA’s JPL has been offered the opportunity to comment. ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/14/karin_nasa_water_satellite/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2aAF6DOvH73AXWV_L7pX3rgAAAQs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aAF6DOvH73AXWV_L7pX3rgAAAQs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33aAF6DOvH73AXWV_L7pX3rgAAAQs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08722-8

[6] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00820-x

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44aAF6DOvH73AXWV_L7pX3rgAAAQs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/15/nasa_cuts_protest/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/14/nasa_science_budget/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/02/08/mimas_subsurface_ocean/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2014/06/13/surprise_three_times_as_much_water_as_all_of_earths_oceans_trapped_underground/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2025/04/14/nasa_science_budget/

[13] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/apr/11/trump-climate-science-nasa-noaa-cuts

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Science from NASA?

Anonymous Coward

So this is their last hoorah before they sink beneath the (accurately plotted) waves themselves, with an Orange Anchor tied around their ankles.

Re: Science from NASA?

Jellied Eel

So this is their last hoorah before they sink beneath the (accurately plotted) waves themselves, with an Orange Anchor tied around their ankles.

According to the conspiracy theorists, of course! Alternatively, what does NOAA stand for? Or even this lot-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Environmental_Satellite,_Data,_and_Information_Service

which for some reason, wiki lumps under NASA rather than NOAA..

Re: Science from NASA?

Anonymous Coward

> What does NOAA stand for?

It used to stand for exemplary science, something that Trump just won't stand for:

[1]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/11/climate/noaa-research-budget-cuts.html

Although, you no doubt believe that is just more conspiracy theorist nonsense.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/11/climate/noaa-research-budget-cuts.html

Re: Science from NASA?

HuBo

Cool stuff indeed. I like how this submesoscale SWOT resolves the " nonlinear internal solitary wave packets [λ ≈ 1-10 km, ampl ≈ 30 cm] radiating eastward away from the plateau " (Fig. 1), that previously manifested only as a spatially averaged blob on the mesoscale DUACS.

Idem for the 8.0 kW m⁻¹ solitary waves [λ ≈ 5 km, ampl ≈ 20 cm] on Fig. 3 and ditto for the superb eddy of Fig. 4 [20 cm anomaly, 1 m s⁻¹] that coincides spatially with localized ocean surface temperature and chlorophyll a concentration anomalies.

If considering these fine-scale features leads to an order of magnitude improvement in the computation of energy fluxes (eg. vs 0.8 kW m⁻¹ from coherent M₂ internal tides, for Fig. 3) then that SWOT is a really good investment. Way worth it, imho!

Love thy neighbor, tune thy piano.