US Army’s laser obsession continues with yet another drone-zapper deal
- Reference: 1742918111
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/03/25/us_army_laser_weapon/
- Source link:
Virginia-based Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) [1]announced yesterday that it has been awarded a contract by the US Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO) for an undisclosed sum to develop and test a high-energy laser (HEL) weapon system. It is intended to shoot down unmanned aircraft ranging from small, low-flying drones to larger surveillance models.
HII's system is being designed to take out drones weighing up to 1,320 pounds (about 600 kg), flying at speeds of up to 250 knots (463 kph), and operating at altitudes as high as 18,000 feet (5,500 m) above sea level - [2]classified as "group 3" unmanned aerial systems (UAS).
[3]
"We look forward to collaborating with the RCCTO on this important effort that will protect the warfighter with an affordable counter-UAS solution," said HII's Grant Hagen, president of Mission Technologies' Warfare Systems group at Huntington Ingalls.
[4]
[5]
Beyond dropping considerably large drones, the Army's [6]solicitation also calls for a system that can operate in both fixed-site and vehicle-mounted configurations, integrate with existing Army networks, support modular design for field repair and parts swapping, and include built-in cybersecurity protections.
All that, and there's a tight timeline too: the RCCTO wants sensor and laser lethality characterization testing in the first quarter of FY2025, a lab demo in Q2 FY25, an integrated system field test in Q3, and a Soldier Touch Point event in Q1 FY26 - which kicks off in October 2025. The program's goal is to pick a prime contractor for production in the first quarter of FY26, with a potential transition to producing up to 20 laser weapon systems by the third quarter of FY26 under a separate Production OTA award.
[7]
Whether those early testing milestones are on track is unclear. HII only just announced the contract and declined to share information outside of what was given in the press release.
What about that other anti-drone laser system?
The Army has had laser weapons capable of neutralizing unmanned aircraft since 2022 in the form of BlueHalo's LOCUST system developed through the Laser Technology Research Development and Optimization (LARDO) program.
The current LOCUST system delivers "hard kills" with a 20-kilowatt beam, meaning it can physically destroy drones mid-flight. The Army signed another contract with BlueHalo last year to develop advanced directed energy prototypes with increased automation, efficiency, ruggedization, and improvements in size, weight, and power.
Lockheed Martin also demonstrated its own [8]vehicle-mounted 50 kW laser system way back in 2023, highlighting the Army's growing list of laser zapper projects and raising questions about how - or if - they're meant to complement each other.
With HII declining to explain how its weapon system differed, the only available clue comes from the solicitation, in which the RCCTO mentions it wants "to expedite the development and field testing of a producible and sustainable laser weapon system," suggesting rapid prototyping and fielding is the objective.
[9]
We've reached out to the Army with questions, but haven't heard back. ®
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://hii.com/news/hii-is-awarded-contract-to-develop-high-energy-laser-weapon-system-for-the-us-army/
[2] https://cuashub.com/en/content/what-do-the-uas-groups-mean/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z-LhLV6-MsYpXT5Ifr0U9AAAAYo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z-LhLV6-MsYpXT5Ifr0U9AAAAYo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z-LhLV6-MsYpXT5Ifr0U9AAAAYo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://sam.gov/opp/bce05e6bcc5741369f636ce21f9a58ba/view
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z-LhLV6-MsYpXT5Ifr0U9AAAAYo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2023/01/26/lockheed_martin_lights_up_50kw/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/publicsector&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z-LhLV6-MsYpXT5Ifr0U9AAAAYo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I dunno, but it would seem to me this might a bit like the tank situation in the 1930s. The capabilities needed, and the type of systems to procure, may need to gel for a while, depending on what the situation ends up looking like.
With the ranges cited, this looks more for nuking the Predator/Reaper/Bayraktar type drones than Ukraine-area's fast 1st person consumer kit and there probably is a case for several types of drone killers:
- how portable? how expensive? : things that are so big and few that they only protect rear areas don't help the frontline grunts.
- what's the cycle time between shots? A 500% sure killing system with 60 sec to recharge is open to swarming.
- what's the power source and how many shots do you get in total before you need to expend serious time reloading?
- still very experimental tech: best maybe to have 2 systems going and diligently pull the plug on whichever one is failing overmuch.
Ultimately .....
..... it all depends on fitting large enough power packs to the sharks!
----------> Mine's the one with the mask and scuba tanks!
All that, and there's a tight timeline too: the RCCTO wants sensor and laser lethality characterization testing in the first quarter of FY2025, a lab demo in Q2 FY25, an integrated system field test in Q3, and a Soldier Touch Point event in Q1 FY26 - which kicks off in October 2025. Just checking, then, Q1 Y25 means this past October-December, and Q2 Y25 ends in about a week, right? Just want to make sure I (we) understand correctly that we're discussing events in the past, even though it's phrased as though these are future wants.
--> for time-travel shenanigans -->
zoolander
Drones are so hot right now