Time to ditch US tech for homegrown options, says Dutch parliament
- Reference: 1742403731
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2025/03/19/dutch_parliament_us_tech/
- Source link:
With each IT service our government moves to American tech giants, we become dumber and weaker...
The motions were [1]submitted and all passed yesterday during a discussion in the Netherlands' House of Representatives on concerns about government data being shipped overseas. While varied, they all center on the theme of calling on the government to replace software and hardware made by US tech companies, acquire new contracts with Dutch companies who offer similar services, and generally safeguard the country's digital sovereignty.
"With each IT service our government moves to American tech giants, we become dumber and weaker," Dutch MP Barbara Kathmann, author of four of the motions, told The Register . "If we continue outsourcing all of our digital infrastructure to billionaires that would rather escape Earth by building space rockets, there will be no Dutch expertise left."
Kathmann's measures specifically call on the government to stop the migration of Dutch information and communications technology to American cloud services, the creation of a Dutch national cloud, the repatriation of the .nl top-level domain to systems operating within the Netherlands, and for the preparation of risk analyses and exit strategies for all government systems hosted by US tech giants. The other measures make similar calls for eliminating the presence of US tech companies in government systems and the preference of local alternatives.
"We have identified the causes of our full dependency on US services," Kathmann told us. "We have to start somewhere – by pausing all thoughtless migrations to American hyperscalers, new opportunities open up for Dutch and European providers."
[2]
The motions passed by the Dutch parliament come as the Trump administration ratchets up tensions with a number of US allies – the EU among them. Nearly 100 EU-based tech companies and lobbyists sent an [3]open letter to the European Commission this week asking it to find a way to divest the bloc from systems managed by US companies due to "the stark geopolitical reality Europe is now facing."
[4]
[5]
Concerns over European reliance on US tech companies are mounting, with tech experts in the EU [6]sounding the call as the Trump administration's international posture becomes increasingly bellicose.
Boffins in the Netherlands, in particular, [7]rang the alarm in February, with Dutch Electoral Council technical advisor Bert Hubert warning that using US cloud services was no longer safe for either the government or civil society.
[8]
It's perhaps for that reason that parliamentarians have been considering the motions passed yesterday for a while, as Kathmann explained.
"The US government has made the call for tech sovereignty an urgent geopolitical issue," Kathmann said. "We support EU tech's open letter, but these motions have a longer history."
[9]Trump administration threatens tariffs for any nation that dares to tax Big Tech
[10]EU lassos tech giants in bid to rein in the AI Wild West
[11]Ex-US Cyber Command chief: Europe and 5 Eyes can't fully replicate US intel
[12]Biden urged to do something about Europe 'unfairly' targeting American tech
Kathmann told us her party, an opposition coalition of the Green and Labor parties, had been working with the governing centrist party, New Social Contract, to develop a new Dutch-centric tech plan since last year, the need for which has been made more pressing as American rhetoric shifts.
"The willingness of the Trump government to use their Big Tech monopoly to put political pressure on European governments, like the threat made to the International Criminal Court, and the attack on European tech laws (DSA, DMA) by VP Vance at the Munich Security Council, have shaken up Dutch politics," Kathmann said.
Will the government actually act?
If the Dutch government takes action, the Netherlands would be the first European nation to repatriate its tech stack from US companies as relations sour. The government is under no obligation to conform to the nonbinding motions, however.
"With eight out of eight proposals passed, it's almost impossible for the government to not take action," Kathmann insisted. "The State Secretary is not legally obligated to follow up on motions, but not acting on such a broad majority in parliament is nearly unheard of."
A spokesperson for the House of Representatives told us "almost all" motions put to the House are accepted, which may mean that the eight-for-eight passage puts less pressure on the government than Kathmann hopes.
[13]
That said, a ninth measure discussed alongside the other eight motions also passed, and the government has already accepted it. That particular measure, which asks the government to increase cooperation in the government service when it comes to implementing information provisions and digitization policies, doesn't mention divestment from US tech companies. Nonetheless, its passage signals the government is paying attention.
"Our party will do whatever we can to keep the government to the parliamentary calls to action," Kathmann said. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.tweedekamer.nl/debat_en_vergadering/plenaire_vergaderingen/details/activiteit?id=2025A02077#:~:text=Moties%20ingediend%20bij%20het%20debat%20over%20migraties%20van%20overheids%2DICT%20naar%20het%20buitenland
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Z9tMioV9VxBt4bCF0GriVgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/17/european_tech_sovereign_fund/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z9tMioV9VxBt4bCF0GriVgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z9tMioV9VxBt4bCF0GriVgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/03/microsoft_unveils_a_finalized_eu/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/26/europe_has_second_thoughts_about/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Z9tMioV9VxBt4bCF0GriVgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/24/trump_administration_dst_countertariffs/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/03/eu_ai_legistlation/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2025/03/19/nakasone_us_intel_sharing/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2023/12/19/congress_eu_dma_complaint/
[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/paasiaas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Z9tMioV9VxBt4bCF0GriVgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
@MiguelC
"I would gladly welcome The Register back to co.uk"
As well as bringing back diversity of views.
Re: @MiguelC
"As well as bringing back diversity of views."
If you mean pro-Russian, pro-Trump bullshit, then no I don't want more "diversity of views".
Can we have our proper English back as well?
> ...that would rather escape Earth by building space rockets,
Rather escape Earth than what exactly? It would probably be a good idea to not be so reliant on companies in other countries: sure! But what does space travel have to do with your justifications? Seems a rather weird thing to say.
Re: Rather escape Earth than what exactly?
That is obviously hyperbole, taken straight out of "Don't look up". But with Musk's plans you never know.
A more realistic scenario can be based on the fact that all of the billionaire bros have [1]bomb save mansions in out of the way places where they can watch us die in agony from a safe distance.
The question remains, why should we build our infrastructure and government on such people who prepare to burn everything down for fun and profit?
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/news/2022/sep/04/super-rich-prepper-bunkers-apocalypse-survival-richest-rushkoff
Re: Rather escape Earth than what exactly?
"where they can watch us die in agony from a safe distance" before they die more slowly.
Re: before they die more slowly.
The whole strategy is straight out of Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" where the "technologists" go on strike and watch Americans die by the hundred million from their safe "valley" to rebuild a just Libertarian society when the dust settles.
Those would be Libertarians have never thought matters through, just like Ayn Rand was more a bad SF writer than a visionary. You cannot rebuild a highly developed industrial society on a graveyard.
It really takes a lot of people just to survive and even then it would take decades to build an industry again. It took Germany and Japan a generation to get back to the forefront of industrialization after WWII. And that was with massive help from the US.
Re: before they die more slowly.
"It really takes a lot of people just to survive "
Indeed, today's society is so reliant on complex technology and skills from around the world. Everything from industrial scale food production, rare earth extraction, chip fabrication, communication technology, medicines and medical technology. With a worldwide disaster, we'd be back to a medieval society, trying to rebuild from the ashes.
Re: before they die more slowly.
With a worldwide disaster, we'd be back to a medieval society, trying to rebuild from the ashes.
But 'a world without America' will fall a long way short of that.
I don't know how America will see things once the rest of the world has endured the adjustment, no longer needs America, and the USA is as isolated as North Korea is.
Liberté. Égalité. Azerty.
There are rumours that the French Minitel system has been under continued development in a skunk works operation outside Paris, and will be rolled out to the sans culottes in a matter of months, in exchange for their iPhones.
Having switched back to their Holborn 9100s, the Dutch should go on and reclaim orangeness too. Trump has pilfered it for the dark side.
It would be lovely if this all led to cash being thrown at an inherently secure OS, software as software, rather than SaaS, and distributed software services, but somehow I doubt it.
Re: Liberté. Égalité. Azerty.
Qwertz you mean!
However, I only use the shift key and it keeps failing to impress me because I never learned to type.
It’s a start …but should have happened long ago
"With each IT service our government moves to American tech giants, we become dumber and weaker,"
Well, at least Ms. Kathmann has her head screwed on. We just have to wait 20 years for the EU to catch up
I hope this happens
As an IT employee at a Dutch university I really welcome this change.
At the moment we open our legs to M$.
We depend on Microsoft to access any of the University resources because we use their SSO.
Then we trust to them virtually all our communication through Teams and Outlook.
And we store all the files from our state-of-the-art research and education on OneDrive and SharePoint.
Most of it could probably be solved with FOSS solutions and the money better spent to hire developers to contribute to said FOSS projects.
Re: I hope this happens
Yes.
Re: I hope this happens
As you say, there are probably FOSS options for all the key bits - but then it needs "a lot" of work to make all the bits work together. Given enough willpower it would be possible to build a FOSS stack to rival MS, but don't hold your breath. When the beancounters get involved, look at the costs of all that work vs the cost of just writing another cheque to MS, you can expect enthusiasm to wane quite a bit.
And of course, you can expect the MS dirty tricks dept and PR machine to go into overdrive against any attempt to leave their ecosystem.
I would gladly welcome The Register back to co.uk