News: 1729603808

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AI's energy appetite has Taiwan reconsidering the nuclear option

(2024/10/22)


The global surge in AI is placing unprecedented pressure on energy resources, with chipmakers such as TSMC consuming vast amounts of electricity to meet growing demand for advanced silicon. In response, Taiwan's government is signaling a potential shift in its longstanding opposition to nuclear energy to address its mounting power needs.

Premier Cho Jung-tai recently provided the clearest indication yet of this potential policy change, citing "surging" energy consumption driven by chipmakers and AI industries. In an [1]interview with Bloomberg , Cho stated: "We hope Taiwan can catch up with global trends in new nuclear technologies." While this is not a definitive commitment to nuclear energy, for a country that vowed to decommission its nuclear plants after Japan's Fukushima disaster, it marks a significant change in the government's rhetoric.

Robot enters Fukushima's nuclear core to retrieve melted-down remains [2]READ MORE

Nuclear energy has been taboo in Taiwan since the 2011 Fukushima incident, which shook public confidence in the safety of nuclear reactors, particularly as Taiwan is subject to similar earthquake events. In the wake of the disaster, Taiwan pledged to phase out nuclear power by 2025. However, with the rapid increase in energy consumption from AI workloads, Premier Cho hinted that Taiwan might need to reconsider its energy strategy to remain competitive in semiconductor manufacturing. TSMC, one of the world's largest semiconductor producers, is facing an electricity price increase of approximately 12.5 percent to support its current expansion efforts.

Before committing to nuclear energy, Cho emphasized the need for a national consensus on safety measures and nuclear waste management, recognizing the potential opposition.

[3]Tech giants set to pay through the nose for nuclear power that's still years away

[4]Amazon makes $500M bet on itty-bitty nuclear reactors to fuel cloud empire

[5]Viable fusion power in a decade? Tokamak Energy dares to dream

[6]Google hopes to spark chain reaction with nuclear energy investment

It's not just about keeping the chip fabs humming. Cho's comments come at a time when China's saber-rattling and military drills have heightened the fear of Taiwan being blockaded from vital energy imports. Unlike the Philippines and South Korea, which are reviving old nuclear projects, Taiwan faces a unique geopolitical challenge in balancing energy security with national defense concerns from across the Taiwan Strait.

Taiwan is not alone in considering nuclear power to meet rising energy demands. In the US, [7]Microsoft has thrown a lifeline to the shuttered Three Mile Island nuclear plant , committing to purchasing the energy it produces once it's revived. [8]Google and Amazon are also betting heavily on next-gen nuclear technology to power their datacenters online.

In an AI-driven global economy, where chipmakers hold significant influence, Taiwan may be compelled to reconsider its nuclear stance to maintain its leadership in the semiconductor industry. The nation's ability to navigate the delicate balance between sustaining its AI-driven growth and addressing public concerns over nuclear energy will be critical, not only for Taiwan's future but also for the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain. ®

[9]

Get our [10]Tech Resources



[1] https://news.bloomberglaw.com/insurance/taiwan-signals-openness-to-nuclear-power-amid-surging-ai-demand

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/11/robot_enters_fukushimas_nuclear_core/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/big_tech_nuclear_power/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/16/amazon_nuclear_smr/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/16/tokamak_fusion_pilot/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/15/google_kairos_smr_nuclear_investment/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/big_tech_nuclear_power/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/big_tech_nuclear_power/

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2ZxfMJYp0bT2mC0zlRIdumAAAAEk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Hmm

codejunky

Not wind? Not solar? They need electricity and so reconsider a stable and reliable generator.

I have a suggestion

IamAProton

If the whole Asia would install insulated glass windows (also called double-pane) with proper gaskets, stop using resistive heaters when there are A/Cs (that can double as heat pumps) pretty much in every room and, dog forbid, insulate the buildings (at least the new ones FFS!) the current energy production would be enough for AI, bitcoin mining and a bunch of other stuff too

Is blindly chasing the power demand.....

Guy de Loimbard

The right way to go here?

Are we at the beginning of a global revolution in technology with AI?

Is it so good, that we just say okay to submitting to a never ending power demand, by this tech, for this tech?

Anyone remember the Bitcoin mining issue as an example?

Rather than just keep throwing money and energy at AI, shouldn't we look at the best way to reduce power demand, or provide renewable supplies?

Re: Is blindly chasing the power demand.....

Anonymous Coward

I thought about this. Power is a national resource for countries and yes they create their own but do we really want that? My understanding is that building the model costs more energy than running the model. e.g. ChatGPT-4 was 100days at 50Gwh to build though I don't know the cost to run.

What if governments passed regulations so that the building of these models is done on a shared basis? A non-profit entity that they all contribute to solely for the purpose of building the models. Sure there are going to be costs to run it once built and they will need their own setups for that but if done right there wouldn't be a cost excess involved for any of the companies and we get to be partially eco friendly in the process. You could take it one step further and get cross country cooperation and stick it somewhere cold with it's own dedicated undersea cables and build a couple of nuclear power plants.

Once a word has been allowed to escape, it cannot be recalled.
-- Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace)