News: 1594739680

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

UK smacks Huawei with banhammer: Buying firm's 5G gear illegal from year-end, mobile networks ordered to rip out all Huawei next-gen kit by 2027

(2020/07/14)


D-day has finally arrived for Huawei in Britain: UK.gov will outlaw the purchase of Huawei gear to build 5G networks by the end of this year, and from 2027 the country's mobile networks must eradicate the Chinese vendor's kit from their 5G infrastructure.

This decision was a long time in the making, and comes off the back of sustained pressure from the US government to ban the integration of Huawei equipment from next generation mobile networks.

Had the government opted for the [1]previously mooted deadline of 2023 , UK networks would have faced significant short-term costs, and according to the networks themselves these would be [2]compounded by lengthy blackouts and delays to the rollout of 5G.

Confirming the decision, Oliver Dowden MP, the Secretary of State for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), claimed that further [3]US sanctions on Huawei imposed in May had a “significant, material” change on the firm’s ability to supply the UK market.

This prompted the government to seek a review of Huawei’s situation by the National Cybersecurity Centre (NSCC), which ultimately concluded the Chinese firm was materially compromised by the sanctions.

Speaking to the House of Commons, Dowden warned the decision to exclude Huawei would have material consequences, not just for the balance sheet of the UK’s networks, but also for the medium-term rollout of the national 5G network.

“Today’s decision to ban the procurement of new Huawei 5G equipment by a year will delay rollout by a year and add half a billion [pounds] to costs,” he said.

"By the time of the next election, we will have implemented in law, an irreversible path for the complete removal of Huawei equipment from our 5G networks. Mr. Speaker, we have not taken this decision lightly. And I must be frank about the decision's consequences for every constituency in this country.

"This will delay our rollout of 5G. Our [4]decisions in January had already set back that rollout and cost up to a billion pounds.

"Today's decision to ban the procurement of new Huawei 5G equipment from the end of this year will delay rollout by further year and will add up to half a billion pounds to costs. Requiring operators, in addition, to remove Huawei equipment from their 5G networks by 2027 will add hundreds of millions of pounds further to the cost and further delay rolled out."

These numbers are exacerbated further by the requirement to strip networks of existing Huawei-made kit, with Dowden warning of a “cumulative delay of two to three” years and costs of up to £2bn.

Labour’s Chi Onwurah, shadow minister for Science, Research and Digital, was critical of the government’s overall strategy towards Huawei, describing it as “incomprehensibly negligent” and calling the current lot the "special relationship poodle" of the US.

“The current education secretary was [5]sacked as defence secretary for leaking parts of the Security Service’s advice on Huawei — and then the government went on to ignore large parts of it,” she said.

“In January, the Foreign Secretary said, in a statement to this house, that they [the government] would legislate at the earliest opportunity on high risk vendors. Then they refused to work with us [Labour] and their own backbenchers to do so,” she added.

Huawei: 'Our future in the UK has become politicised'

Predictably, Huawei has criticised today’s decision, describing it as “bad news for anyone in the UK with a mobile phone.”

“It threatens to move Britain into the digital slow lane, push up bills and deepen the digital divide. Instead of ‘levelling up’ the government is levelling down and we urge them to reconsider. We remain confident that the new US restrictions would not have affected the resilience or security of the products we supply to the UK,” said Huawei spokesperson Ed Brewster.

“Regrettably our future in the UK has become politicised, this is about US trade policy and not security. Over the past 20 years, Huawei has focused on building a better connected UK. As a responsible business, we will continue to support our customers as we have always done,” he added.

Brewster said Huawei will “conduct a detailed review” about what today’s decision means for its business, pledging to work with the government to “explain how we can continue to contribute to a better connected Britain.”

Reliance on Huawei a 'global market failure'

Although Huawei’s ongoing woes are the direct result of sanctions against the firm, combined with intense lobbying pressure from the US government, Dowden was nonetheless critical about a “global market failure” that led to networks being over-reliant on too few vendors.

Presently, the 5G space is dominated by a troika of three large vendors — Ericsson, Nokia, and Huawei — with a few others (namely Samsung, Cisco, and ZTE) mopping up the remaining crumbs.

Although today’s decision is to do with the national 5G network, Dowden said the government is examining the situation as it relates to the national gigabit fibre network, as well as legacy mobile networks.

With respect to fixed-line networks, Dowden announced a technical consultation that would aim to identify possible alternatives and manage existing risks. This period is expected to last no longer than two years.

Both Dowden and Onwurah said a move towards open standards would benefit the market, with the DCMS minister saying of [6]open RAN , which has been pushed by the US government as a way of replacing Huawei kit by getting other vendors to buy into nonproprietary designs that make their equipment interoperable: "There are big barriers to it. But of course, that is the objective we're working towards."

The government will also seek to secure the existing supply chains, while lowering barriers to entry for new vendors and investing in R&D.

Speaking to The Register , telecoms analyst Paolo Pescatore described today’s news as “a huge blow” for Huawei,” as well as a “major headache” for telcos.

“While, there are other network vendors who could pick up the pieces, it is unclear whether they are up to the task,” he said. “Established rivals like Ericsson and Nokia have been struggling and there’s a resurgence of players like Samsung Networks and Japanese players Fujitsu, NEC. Smaller, fast growing and niche solution providers like [open RAN kit purveyor] Mavenir will all be keen to secure new business.” He added: "Who will fork out for these additional costs and disruption in any service issues that might arise? Hopefully not the users! Ultimately any additional costs always gets passed onto the user. More so at a time when margins are already squeezed and all players are seeing the economic impact from the pandemic."

BT told The Reg : “We note the government’s announcement today relating to the use of Huawei equipment in the UK. The security and resilience of our networks is an absolute priority for BT. While we have prepared for a range of scenarios, we need to further analyse the details and implications of this decision before taking a view of potential costs and impacts.”

Gartner's Sylvain Fabre told us: "Generally the costs are one issue, although it can be expected that CSPs will push back for help from government; what really affects the speed of 5G rollout is the lead times for approval for upgrade work on existing sites, and the negotiating time for new sites with landlords etc.

"CSPs also upgrade sites and cities on a need basis – justified by both demand, 4G infrastructure being maxed out, and an ability to monetise. Since the CSPs have until 2027, this is plenty of time for the wireless infrastructure, where even newly installed equipment would be updated within that time frame, and so far only a limited part of the UK has seen 5G upgrades.

"The other non-Chinese vendors do get to split the market share now available, however it is not necessarily going to go to the large incumbent vendors, as operators may want to introduce new vendors in order to maintain supplier diversity.

®

Get our [7]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/23/bojo_buckles_huawei_out/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/10/huawei_testimony/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/16/huawei_chip_ban_latest/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/28/uk_says_yes_to_limited_huawei_non_core/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2019/05/01/gavin_williamson_sacked/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/13/lawmakers_open_5g/

[7] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

Timetables matter

Charlie Clark

By the time of the next election, we will have implemented in law

In other words, we're going to take our time over this and see how things on the other side of the Atlantic develop.

By all means keep Huawei on a short leash, but booting them off completely makes little sense.

This will end in tears.

Anonymous Coward

Gammon flavoured, "Where are all the trade deals we were promised?" tears.

HK plus this. Too much for there to be no Chinese retaliation. I just hope uk.gov are not planning any ineffectual sabre-rattling on China's back door any time soon ...

Re: This will end in tears.

My other car is also a Trabant.

JLR: half Chinese owned, expect to be moved out to the mainland. Tears in Solihull.

Huawei R&D investment: what was that? Tears in Cambridge.

US trade deal: junk food in exchange for our surviving companies.

"We won, get over it."

Re: This will end in tears.

Anonymous Coward

Why should freezing out Huawei anger China, unless that's a tacit admission that the company is in the pocket of the CCP?

Re: This will end in tears.

MiguelC

For the sake of the exercise, wouldn’t the British government be incensed if, let’s say, JCB was banned from selling its machinery in China? Would that automagically transform JCB into a government owned company?

Re: This will end in tears.

Outski

Yes, they would be unhappy, but that's largely becasue JCB and Lord Bamford are significant donors to the Conservatives (and previously pro-Brexit organisations).

Re: This will end in tears.

Anonymous Coward

HK plus this. Too much for there to be no Chinese retaliation.

One could argue that the offer of citizenship was in response to China departing from the agreed upon "one country, two systems" model.

Also, as a Brexiteer I welcome with open arms any HK national that wishes to flee the clutches of the tyrannical Chinese Communist Party. That's precisely the sort of path I had hoped Britain would follow as an independent nation.

Re: This will end in tears.

John Robson

"Also, as a Brexiteer I welcome with open arms any HK national that wishes to flee the clutches of the tyrannical Chinese Communist Party. That's precisely the sort of path I had hoped Britain would follow as an independent nation."

And we were already able to do that as an EU member...

Re: This will end in tears.

Anonymous Coward

And we were already able to do that as an EU member...

I never claimed Brexit enabled us to offer people from HK citizenship. I was simply countering the lazy stereotypes (xenophobic, racist, gammons etc. etc.) tossed around by those who still haven't come to terms with the result of a referendum held 4 years ago.

Pah, the UK is a growing irrelevance.

Anonymous Coward

Noting better for the world that making China more self-reliant in sourcing what it needs [<-irony], will be great for RISK-V, new chips seem to be coming out in spades.

TL;DR:

To Mars in Man Bras!

US: Jump!

UK: How high?

[Rinse and repeat ad nauseam]

It never begins to amaze me how the UK is so much America's lickspittle that successive British governments are literally willing to sabotage their own economy & security, just to please their American masters. These are the same people who, seemingly without a trace of irony, spout phrases like "Taking back control" , in relation to leaving the EU.

Logic?

ARGO

So Huawei are (eventually) banned from providing 5G base stations - where all the traffic is strongly encrypted - but not from the 2G & 3G networks where the encryption is rather more ropey.

And this is about security you say?

Who should have our data?

Paratrooping Parrot

Maybe the UK wants to give all our data to the US and will therefore fill up the whole network with Cisco switches to hand over all data to the US.

Doctor Syntax

Isn't it great to have taken back control so we can do just what Trump tells us to do.

Fairly Happy

Richard Jones 1

I am happy not to have the criminal CCP providing or tapping off my service. Though I should point out that at the moment mobile service is so ropey that callers foolish enough to call the mobile have to be told to call the landline. I guess nothing much will change on that front and that nothing was really expected to change either. I did see the 5G forecast charges, so no, nothing will change for me least of all that market segment.

At least Wi-Fi allows mobile data, though I seriously prefer a 23-inch screen, over a postage stamp on the mobile. Still, Wi-Fi does allow the mobile to update, frequently.

Re: Fairly Happy

Kabukiwookie

Yes, now you only have the GCHQ, NSA, CIA and FBI to worry about.

Hey Boris I thought you wanted to be King of the World!

Anonymous Coward

Not court jester of the orange one...

- So we already have the American style student course fees which are just great to build up the brains of our nation.

- About to get chlorinated chicken and who knows what hormones in beef.

- Technology? Yay lets pay more for less, as long as some rich people line their pockets, go nationalism!!!!

- NHS? Have you heard of the horror stories of people going in for a simple checkup and ending up with a bill easily over 50,000USD?

Lets not forget who f**ked some many people's pensions in 2008, and Blair acting as Bush's little puppy dog not only destabilised the middle east, but was a poison pill for their ratings.

How about we go about British exceptionalism by being British rather than copying a country who celebrates their violent independence from us every July the 4th, you know the date where a load of British people might get really ill because of reasons....

Terrible Decision

simpfeld

No Huawei security issues shown by GCHQ testing or anyone else for that matter.

Plenty of security issues shown in US originated equipment (Cisco, Juniper, encryption standards with introduced weaknesses).

Yeah, cause UK intelligence sensitive information is travelling over mobile networks without end-to-end crypto, if so that person needs firing.

Of course we didn't want to annoy the orange one, but I guess we are keeping our options. The Chinese leader may tell him he's great and allow him to open a few hotels and Huawei will be okay again.

By long-standing tradition, I take this opportunity to savage other
designers in the thin disguise of good, clean fun.
-- P. J. Plauger, "Computer Language", 1988, April
Fool's column.