News: 0001635664

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Linux 7.1-rc5 Released With Fixes Ramping Up From AI Coding Agents

([Linux Kernel] 69 Minutes Ago Linux 7.1)


In the road to releasing [1]Linux 7.1 in June, out today is Linux 7.1-rc5 that continues coming on heavy with fixes.

Linux 7.1-rc5 brings [2]more code fixes crafted by different AI coding agents like GitHub Copilot and Claude Code. The AI-driven fixes scatter the kernel spectrum from different graphics driver bugs to security issues being addressed in the C code. During the networking fixes merge this week, the merge request noted [3]the craziness continues with no end in sight . There were also [4]many sound subsystem fixes merged for the week too. Linus Torvalds marked this week that [5]AI tools are great when not causing unnecessary pain and "pointless make-believe work".

Linux 7.1-rc5 also brings [6]more HP and ASUS laptops seeing x86 platform driver support , [7]Intel P-State and AMD P-State driver fixes for different issues, and other hardware driver fixes.

Linux 7.1 stable should be out by mid June and is [8]bringing many new features and changes .

Update: Linus Torvalds is now out with his [9]7.1-rc5 announcement and he's not happy with the size of the kernel and the ongoing AI churn this late in the cycle:

"To the surprise of absolutely nobody by now, rc5 is pretty big. Quite a bit bigger than rc5's have traditionally been.

I'm not entirely happy about it - most of this is totally trivial stuff to random drivers, which obviously makes it all less scary, but at the same time I'm really not convinced the churn is worth it at rc5 time. These things are "fixes", sure, but at the same time a lot of them are simply so irrelevant that I think they'd be better off in a linux-next tree and get merged during the merge window.

So I think I'll start being a bit more hardnosed about this kind of unnecessary churn this late in the game. We are supposed to look for *regressions*. Non-critical fixes to long-standing issues are simply not appropriate for this late in the release cycle.

End result: this is too big, and this is the heads-up that I'll be pushing back on pointless pull requests with fixes that just aren't that important. And yes, several of these series were triggered by AI code review.

Because fixes or not - and trivial or not - these kinds of large rc weeks are *not* conducive to long-term stability. Trivial fixes may be trivial, and have a pretty low chance of causing problems, but "low chance" is still not "zero chance".

So people: start looking closer at your pull requests, and ask yourself: "Is this really a regression or serious enough that it shouldn't just go into the development pile?"."



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/search/Linux+7.1

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-rc5-AI-This-Week

[3] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-Networking-Craziness

[4] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-Sound-Many-Fixes

[5] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-AI-Tools-Can-Be-Great

[6] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-rc5-Platform-Drivers

[7] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.1-PM-Dynamic-EPP-Bart

[8] https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-71-features-changes

[9] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wjt1NiKOdyAMz_DT7NmZ++SizPOhRSi492ukdTnpDzHQw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u



I've said some stupid things and some wrong things, but not that. No one
involved in computers would ever say that a certain amount of memory is enough
for all time ... I keep bumping into that silly quotation attributed to me that
says 640 K of memory is enough. There's never a citation; the quotation just
floats like a rumor, repeated again and again.

-- Gates (19 January 1996), "Career Opportunities in Computing-and More".
Bloomberg Business News

Do you realize the pain the industry went through while the IBM PC was limited
to 640 K? The machine was going to be 512 K at one point, and we kept pushing
it up. I never said that statement - I said the opposite of that.

-- "Gates talks". U.S. News & World Report. August 20, 2001. Retrieved on
October 8, 2014.

I have to say that in 1981, making those decisions, I felt like I was providing
enough freedom for 10 years. That is, a move from 64k to 640k felt like
something that would last a great deal of time. Well, it didnīt - it took about
only 6 years before people started to see that as a real problem.

-- speech to the Computer Science Club at the University of Waterloo, 1989

-- https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates#Misattributed