News: 0001571621

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Linux 6.17-rc3 Released: "A Bit Larger Than Usual"

([Linux Kernel] 5 Hours Ago Linux 6.17-rc3)


[1]Linux 6.17 is one step closer to release with Linus Torvalds having issued Linux 6.17-rc3 already today to currently traveling in Europe.

Linux 6.17-rc3 is out a few hours early today. This week brought [2]HP Victus 16-r1000 gaming laptop fan and thermal profile support alongside various other fixes. For the most part it was routine bug/regression fixes for the week with not too much else standing out.

Linus Torvalds commented in the [3]6.17-rc3 announcement :

"I'm still traveling for family reasons, so slightly unusual timing for rc3, but it's (barely) afternoon here on the East coast, so the usual Sunday afternoon schedule technically still holds.

As suspected, rc3 ends up being a bit larger than usual, to balance out the tiny rc2. Yes, 3.17 seems to be generally in pretty good shape, but nobody *really* believed that it was as good as that tiny rc2 would make it seem.

And while rc3 is on the larger side, it's by no means anything outrageously so, it's well within the normal parameters.

The diffstat looks fairly normal too: about half drivers (spread all over, we've got a bit of everything, but mellanox mlx5 stands out if you want to pick out any particular area). There's a fair chunk of added selftests and some more Rust support, and then a random collection of fixes all over: architecture code, filesystems, VM and core networking.

Anyway, things seem fairly normal for this phase in the release cycle, nothing stands out. Please keep testing,"

Linux 6.17 stable will be out around the end of September. See our [4]Linux 6.17 feature overview for a look at all the interesting changes coming to this next kernel release.



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/search/Linux+6.17

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/news/HP-Victus-16-r1000-Linux

[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgKmy+gOftf32wT86F+mSvdq2=XZe8Tcb5m0NaQTZt-dg@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

[4] https://www.phoronix.com/review/linux-617-features



ehansin

sophisticles

My message is not that biological determinists were bad scientists or
even that they were always wrong. Rather, I believe that science must be
understood as a social phenomenon, a gutsy, human enterprise, not the work of
robots programmed to collect pure information. I also present this view as
an upbeat for science, not as a gloomy epitaph for a noble hope sacrificed on
the alter of human limitations.
I believe that a factual reality exists and that science, though often
in an obtuse and erratic manner, can learn about it. Galileo was not shown
the instruments of torture in an abstract debate about lunar motion. He had
threatened the Church's conventional argument for social and doctrinal
stability: the static world order with planets circling about a central
earth, priests subordinate to the Pope and serfs to their lord. But the
Church soon made its peace with Galileo's cosmology. They had no choice; the
earth really does revolve about the sun.
-- S. J. Gould, "The Mismeasure of Man"