News: 0001564973

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AMD Streaming SDK Updated With Linux Support - But Recommending X.Org Over Wayland

([AMD] 32 Minutes Ago AMD Streaming SDK)


AMD's GPUOpen group today released the AMD Interactive Streaking SDK 1.1 release that now delivers Linux support alongside the existing Microsoft Windows support. The AMD Interactive Streaming SDK is designed to provide pieces for developers to build-out low-latency streaming solutions for cloud gaming, virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), and embedded applications. This MIT-licensed streaming SDK was originally launched by AMD back in March as Windows-only while now is thankfully also native to Linux.

The headline feature of the AMD Interactive Streaming SDK 1.1 update is Linux support. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS are officially supported along with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8/9 and SUSE Linux Enterprise 15 SP7.

With this initial release, however, on the server-side AMD Radeon Pro Software for Linux driver is required and not the fully upstream AMDGPU + Mesa graphics driver components. For the client-side use, either the AMD Radeon Software packaged driver or the Mesa RADV driver will work out fine.

Besides that driver support caveat, for now at least AMD is recommending the AMD Streaming SDK be used on the X.Org Server rather than Wayland-based desktops. Today's release announcement notes:

"X.org is recommended over Wayland (required for server and recommended for client) due to some limitations imposed by Wayland."

The release notes did not outline the current limitations of Wayland for this streaming solution.

Downloads and more details on the AMD Interactive Streaming SDK 1.1 release with Linux support via [1]GPUOpen.com . The MIT-licensed open-source code is available on [2]GitHub .



[1] https://gpuopen.com/amd-advanced-interactive-streaming-sdk/

[2] https://github.com/GPUOpen-LibrariesAndSDKs/Streaming-SDK



davidbepo

Weasel

Weasel

NeoMorpheus

geerge

So we get to my point. Surely people around here read things that
aren't on the *Officially Sanctioned Cyberpunk Reading List*. Surely we
don't (any of us) really believe that there is some big, deep political and
philosophical message in all this, do we? So if this `cyberpunk' thing is
just a term of convenience, how can somebody sell out? If cyberpunk is just a
word we use to describe a particular style and imagery in sf, how can it be
dead? Where are the profound statements that the `Movement' is or was trying
to make?
I think most of us are interested in examining and discussing literary
(and musical) works that possess a certain stylistic excellence and perhaps a
rather extreme perspective; this is what CP is all about, no? Maybe there
should be a newsgroup like, say, alt.postmodern or something. Something less
restrictive in scope than alt.cyberpunk.
-- Jeff G. Bone