News: 0001546485

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AMD Ryzen 9 9900 Series Linux Performance Since Launch

([Processors] 31 Minutes Ago Add A Comment)


After recently looking at [1]how the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" Linux performance has evolved since launch , many Phoronix readers were curious how a similar launch-day vs. now comparison would look on the AMD Zen 5 side. The article today is looking at how the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Ryzen 9 9950X Linux performance has evolved since their launch last year. These numbers are put alongside the prior Intel Arrow Lake results for additional context.

[2]

For those curious how the AMD Ryzen 9000 series Linux performance has evolved since their launch last summer, this article is for you with comparing those original Ubuntu benchmark results to where they are now on the recently released Ubuntu 25.04.

[3]

The Ryzen 9 9900X and 9950X were both re-tested atop the updated Ubuntu 25.04 Linux operating system with the Linux 6.14 kernel, GCC 14.2, Mesa 25.0, Python 3.13, and other open-source software upgrades. The system was put back into its state as tested for the original launch-day testing with both CPUs on stock speeds, GSKILL 2 x 16GB DDR5-6000 memory, AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE graphics, and Corsair 2TB MP700 PRO NVMe SSD.

Here are the results for launch day versus now for both the AMD Zen 5 and Intel Arrow Lake desktop processors. In addition to the raw performance benchmarks were also the CPU power consumption numbers for reference on how the power efficiency has evolved over nearly the past year.



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-arrow-lake-ubuntu-2504

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/image-viewer.php?id=ryzen-9900-linux-2025&image=ryzen9900_2025_1_lrg

[3] https://www.phoronix.com/image-viewer.php?id=ryzen-9900-linux-2025&image=ryzen9900_2025_2_lrg



Brief History Of Linux (#18)
The rise and rise of the Microsoft Empire

The DOS and Windows releases kept coming, and much to everyone's surprise,
Microsoft became more and more successful. This brought much frustration
to computer experts who kept predicting the demise of Microsoft and the
rise of Macintosh, Unix, and OS/2.

Nobody ever got fired for choosing Microsoft, which was the prime reason
that DOS and Windows prevailed. Oh, and DOS had better games as well,
which we all know is the most important feature an OS can have.

In 1986 Microsoft's continued success prompted the company to undergo a
wildly successful IPO. Afterwards, Microsoft and Chairman Bill had
accumulated enough money to acquire small countries without missing a
step, but all that money couldn't buy quality software. Gates could,
however, buy enough marketing and hype to keep MS-DOS (Maybe Some Day an
Operating System) and Windows (Will Install Needless Data On While System)
as the dominant platforms, so quality didn't matter. This fact was
demonstrated in Microsoft's short-lived slogan from 1988, "At Microsoft,
quality is job 1.1".